4. 例: エルゼビアの方針
Authors can use either their accepted author manuscript or
final published article for:
Use at a conference, meeting or for teaching purposes
Internal training by their company
Sharing individual articles with colleagues for their
research use* (also known as ’scholarly sharing’)
Use in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works
Inclusion in a thesis or dissertation
Reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other
works
Preparation of derivative works (other than for
commercial purposes)
10/21/2013
4/19
5. ウェブ掲載に関するポリシー
Personal use Use by an author in the author ’ classroom
s
teaching etc ⇒ 著作権許諾と同様
Internal institutional use Use by the author ’ institution for
s
classroom teaching at the institution (including
distribution of copies,paper or electronic, and
use in course packs and courseware programs).
For employed authors, the use by their
employing company for internal training
purposes.
Permitted scholarly posting Voluntary posting by an author
on open websites operated by the author or the
author ’ institution for scholarly purposes, as
s
determined by the author, or (in connection
with preprints) on preprint servers.
10/21/2013
5/19
9. ルイジアナ州立大学の論文提出要項 (Journal style) から
This style permits the inclusion, as chapters or sections of the
thesis or dissertation, of manuscripts previously submitted or to be
submitted to scholarly journals. If the journal style is used, you, as
the Candidate, must be the only author on the to-be-published
manuscript. All chapters in the manuscript to be prepared
according to journal style must be in the style of a single
appropriate scholarly journal. Some features peculiar to submission
of manuscripts to journal editors (e.g., double spacing of block
quotations) must be eliminated, ... Additional ambiguous textual
situations must be brought to the attention of the manuscript ’
s
reviewer, clarified, and resolved to his or her satisfaction.
Because the Graduate School ’ primary concern is the
s
presentation of the thesis or dissertation as a clear, coherent,
consistent, self-contained work, the manuscript must contain
elements unifying the entire body of work. Primarily, it must have
a single topic. Although each chapter may be complete within
itself, the chapters must treat one aspect of the overall topic....
10/21/2013
9/19
17. Gowers’s Weblog(2009 年 1 月 27 日記事から)I
In short, if a large group of mathematicians could connect
their brains efficiently, they could perhaps solve problems
very efficiently as well.
The next obvious question is this. Why would anyone agree
to share their ideas? Surely we work on problems in order to
be able to publish solutions and get credit for them. And
what if the big collaboration resulted in a very good idea?
Isn ’ there a danger that somebody would manage to use
t
the idea to solve the problem and rush to (individual)
publication?
Here is where the beauty of blogs, wikis, forums etc. comes
in: they are completely public, as is their entire history. To
see what effect this might have, imagine that a problem was
being solved via comments on a blog post. Suppose that the
blog was pretty active and that the post was getting several
interesting comments. And suppose that you had an idea
that you thought might be a good one. Instead of the usual
10/21/2013
17/19
18. Gowers’s Weblog(2009 年 1 月 27 日記事から)II
reaction of being afraid to share it in case someone else beat
you to the solution, you would be afraid not to share it in
case someone beat you to that particular idea. And if the
problem eventually got solved, and published under some
pseudonym like Polymath, say, with a footnote linking to the
blog and explaining how the problem had been solved, then
anybody could go to the blog and look at all the comments.
And there they would find your idea and would know
precisely what you had contributed. There might be
arguments about which ideas had proved to be most
important to the solution, but at least all the evidence would
be there for everybody to look at. Back
10/21/2013
18/19