course material

1. Discussion: 3 differential diagnosis
Discussion: 3 differential diagnosisDiscussion: 3 differential diagnosisThe following
attachments are as follow: 1. The case study scenario- should be what the case study is
about. Please read. I already provided the diagnosis I want.2. Rubric for individual case
study- Please adhere to the rubric:3. Irene’s case study- This is an example of my first case
study. Feel free to keep the similar format. Satisfy the rubric.4. Sample template case study-
This is another example provided by the instructor. NOT MY FAVORITE plus does not
completely satisfy the rubricORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE
PAPERSInstructions:1. Write a case study about the given case scenario using the SOAP
format.2. Review and follow the case study writing outline and rubric in building your case
and as basis of grading.3. Paperwork must be submitted via assignment link provided in the
Blackboard on or before 7/29/2020 11:59 pm. Case Scenario:A 21-year old college student
and self-described as a “ladies’ man” presents to the clinic because of a concerning spot that
developed on his penis. He complains of pain at the spot but denies itching. He reports no
fever. When asked further about his sexual practices, he reports no condom use because his
partners are all “on the pill.” He had chlamydia in high school but is otherwise
healthy. Discussion: 3 differential diagnosisThe rest of the pertinent medical histories are
unremarkable.His review of systems is negative.VS: BP 120/80; HR 70; RR 16; T 98.0 F;
Pain level 3/10On examination of the penis, you find a 1-cm tender, erythematous papule
with a deep central ulceration at the glans penis. There is some mild, tender
lymphadenopathy in the inguinal area. The rest of the examination is unremarkable.All
papers are to be type written, double spaced, with pages numbered. Please write course
name and number, your name, and date clearly on materials submitted. Use American
Psychological Association (APA) style 6th edition including paper format and references.
Points may be deducted for multiple spelling, grammar, format and typing errors.1.
Subjective (0.5 point)State the patient’s chief complaint, reason for visit and/or the problem
for which the patient sought consultation.a. All symptoms related to the problem are
described using the following cue descriptive categories:1. Precipitating/alleviating factors
(including prescribed and/or self-remedies and their effect on the problem).2. Associated
symptoms3. Quality of all reported symptoms including the effect on the patient’s lifestyle4.
Temporal factors (date of onset, frequency, duration, sequence of events)5. Location
(localized or generalized? does it radiate?)6. Sequelae (complications, impact on patient
and/or significant other)7. Severity of the symptomsb. Past Medical History including
immunizations, allergies, accidents, illnesses, operations, hospitalizations.c. Family History

2. includes family members’ health history.d. Social history to include habits, residence,
financial situation, outside assistance, family inter-relationships.e. Review of Systems
relevant to the chief complaint/presenting problem is included. Include pertinent positives
and negatives.2. Objective (0.5 point)a. Using inspection, palpation, percussion, and
auscultation, the examiner evaluates all systems associated with the subjective complaint
including all systems which may be causing the problem or which will manifest or may
potentially manifest complications and records positive and pertinent negative findingsb.
Performs appropriate diagnostic studies if equipment is availablec. Records results of
pertinent, previously obtained diagnostic studies.d. Use Handout Guidelines to Physical
Examination.3. Assessment (1.5 points)a. Diagnosis/es is (are) derived from the subjective
and objective data highlighting the pathophysiology of the case/s.b. Differential diagnoses
are prioritized (minimum of 3)c. Diagnosis/es come(s) from the medical and/or nursing
domaind. Assessment includes health risks/needs assessment4. Plan (1.5 points)a.
Appropriate diagnostic studies with rationaleb. Therapeutic treatment plan with rationalec.
Was this patient appropriate for a nurse practitioner as a provider? Is consultation or
collaboration with another health care provider required?d. Health promotion/disease
prevention carried out or planned: education, discussion, handouts given, evidence of
patient’s understanding.e. What community resources are available in the provision of care
for this client?f. Referrals initiated (including to whom the patient is referred to and the
purpose)g. Target dates for re-evaluating the results of the plan and follow up5. Other (1
point)a. Information is typed , double-spaced, 12pt font, and concise (using short
paragraphs and phrases)b. Information is written so that the objective reader can follow the
progression of events and informationc. Only standard, accepted medical terminology and
abbreviations are used.d. At least three (3) references from recent professional journal
publications are required for each (APA format) . These can include but not limited to
medical, research, pharmacological or advanced practice nursing journals. More than 3
references should be used.e. Rationales need to include a clear demonstration of the use of
evidence-based practice in decision-making. Risks and benefits as well as how an
intervention was determined to be evidence-based will be clear to the reader.f. Rationales
need to include a clear demonstration of the use of evidence-based practice in decision-
making. Risks and benefits as well as how an intervention was determined to be evidence-
based will be clear to the reader. Discussion: 3 differential diagnosis