Presentation on the case of Presbyterian Church of Sudan v Talisman Energy Inc. On the use of private law to enforce human rights law using the US Alien Tort Statute.
3. International Human Rights Law
●
Public International Law
– Treaties between states
– International customary law
●
Promote and protect Human Rights
●
Duty on states to uphold these rights
– Domestic law compatible with international
legislation
5. Alien Tort Statute
●
“The district courts
shall have original
jurisdiction of any civil
action by an alien for
a tort only, committed
in violation of the law
of nations or a treaty
of the United States.”
- 28 U.S. Code § 135
●
For a tort only
●
In violation of the law
of nations
6. Allegations
●
Talisman were complicit in human rights
abuses carried out by Sudanese forces
– Roads linking to military bases
– Allowing military garrisons in concession areas
– Upgrades to airstrips
– Creation of 'buffer zones'
– Oil revenues lead to increased military spending
7. Presbyterian Church of Sudan v.
Talisman Energy, Inc.
●
Can a corporation be
liable for aiding and
abetting?
– Sosa vs Alvarez-
Machain
– Khulumani vs Barclay
National Bank
– Nuremberg Trials
●
Can liability be
imposed “absent a
showing of purpose”?
– Mens rea
●
Purpose
●
Knowledge
8. Presbyterian Church of Sudan v.
Talisman Energy, Inc.
●
Domestic norms v
International norms
– Follow international
customary law
●
But:
– Nuremberg
– ICTY/ICTR
– ICC/Rome Statutes
●
"not enough for
plaintiffs to establish
Talisman's complicity
in depopulating
areas .. . plaintiffs
must establish that
Talisman acted with
the purpose [of
assisting] the
Government's
violations of customary
international law."
9. Criticised decision
“as long as I.G. Farben intended only to
make money, not to exterminate Jews, [the
Talisman standard] would make it
permissible for such a company to keep
supplying a government with massive
quantities of Zyklon B. poison gas knowing
precisely what it is used for”
- John Ruggie
10. Consequences
●
Talisman pulled out of
Sudan in 2003
●
Started CSR dept
●
Court agreed to hear
case
– Kiobel v. Royal Dutch
Petroleum
– Torture Victim
Protection Act