A critical review and considerations: Green economy, what is it?
EU integration policy and the UK multiculturalism debates: how do they fit Finland? Sirkka Komulainen, PhD
1. EU integration policy and the
UK multiculturalism debates:
how do they fit Finland?
Sirkka Komulainen, PhD
New era in integration policies in the Baltic Sea
Countries?
Tallinn, Estonia
25.2.2013
2. Outline
Demographics of immigration in Finland
Some background and context
Finnish Immigration Act 2011: two-way
integration
European and UK discourses:
multiculturalism vs interculturalism
What fits, what does not? Policy and social
science perspectives
3. Demographics about immigration in
Finland
Finland: 5,425,056 people (2012)
In 2011 257,248 foreign persons (4.8%) of which 59% of
European origin - 23% Asian, 12% African
Most live in the capital region
There were 67,127 Russians in Finland at the end of 2011,
representing 26 per cent of all people with foreign origin. The
next biggest groups were people of Estonian origin, 30,250
persons, of Somalian origin, 13,930 persons, and of Iraqi origin,
10,072 persons.
Examined by background country, the largest group by far is the
former Soviet Union or Russia.
(Source: Statistics Finland URL: http://www.stat.fi/til/vaerak/2011/01/vaerak_2011_01_2012-11-
30_tie_001_en.html)
5. Background and context
Steady yet modest rise in immigration
EU policies: Matching economic migration with labour market needs
Ageing population in countries like Finland
Humanitarian concerns: e.g. Finland receives between 2,000 and
6,000 applications for asylum annually
Labour, student, marriage and family reunification immigration
Between 20,000 and 40,000 Ingrians have benefited from Finland's
Right of Return law over the past 20 years
“Finland does not claim an optimally integrated foreign population,
nor is it considered among the top destination countries for
migrants” (Tanner, 2011)
6. Ministry of the Interior on integration
“Integration means that immigrants adapt themselves
to Finnish society and acquire new skills,
competences and practices which help them actively
participate in the life of their new home country.
Some immigrants find it easy to integrate; others need
more time and support services - integration measures -
to adapt themselves. Some knowledge of Finnish or
Swedish, and information about Finnish society are
important requirements for integration.”
7. Continued...
A number of public authorities in central government and
municipalities deal with the integration of immigrants.
The objective of integration measures is to help
immigrants to know their rights and duties in Finnish
society, and feel welcome in Finland.
The Act on the Promotion of Immigrant Integration
2011 guides integration
Central: Two-Way Integration
http://www.intermin.fi/en/migration/integration
8. Discourses on multiculturalism (and
interculturalism) travel
Superdiversity (Vertovec, 2006)
Multiculturalism tends to preserve a cultural heritage,
while interculturalism acknowledges and enables
cultures to have currency, to be exchanged, to circulate,
to be modified and evolve
Interculturalism is allegedly more geared toward
interaction and dialogue than multiculturalism: less
‘groupist’ or more committed to societal cohesion and
national citizenship (Meer & Modood, 2011)
9. Is Finland racist? The topical question
Multiculturalism and intercultural dialogue – old and new
racism
The media interested in the True Finns and the far right
– bad press about Finland abroad
White resentment, benign ignorance or outright racism?
Government commitment to integration policies and
emerging intercultural competence paradigms in HE
The Finns talk about immigration and multiculturalism –
not so much about interculturalism
10. Integration into ’what’? CaseFinland
Same discourses, different context – not superdiversity
Finland was for long a country of emigration
Moderate immigration, not so many TCNs
Geopolitics: e.g. Ingrian Finns and the collapse of the Soviet Union
Labour market: specific nature, demand & supply, ageing population
Global and local control issues (Guild & Mantu, 2011)
Social cohesion?
Indigenous populations and minority rights
Possibilities for day-to-day mixing (e.g. Komulainen, 2012; Howarth
& Andreouli) a challenge for two-way integration
11. Conclusions – to be discussed
Policy, media and scientific discourses vs lived realities
(Komulainen, 2012)
What are the most urgent problems to solve?
Polarisations in the media
General inequality
Labour market segregation and fragmentation
Minority rights in perspective
Implementing policies hampered by short-term funding
Integration into ‘what’ in times of austerity?
12. References
Guild, Elspeth & Mantu, Sandra (eds.) (2011) Constructing and Imagining Labour Migration:
Perspectives of Control from Five Continents. Farnham: Ashgate.
Howarth, C. & Andreouli, E. Has multiculturalism failed? The importance of lay knowledge and
everyday practice. London School of Economics (incomplete reference).
Komulainen, S. (2012) Porvarillisen idyllin vai pikku-Moskovan lapset? Monikulttuurisuuden
vaikutus suomalaisperheiden koulupaikan valintaan Turussa. Institute of Migration, Research
series A 39.
Meer, N. & Modood, T. (2011) How does interculturalism contrast with multiculturalism. Journal of
intercultural studies, on-line first DOI:10.1080/07256868.2011.618266
Ministry of the Interior Integration URL: http://www.intermin.fi/en/migration/integration
Parekh, B., (2000) Rethinking multiculturalism: cultural diversity and political theory.
London:Palgrave.
Statistics Finland 2011
Tanner, A. (2011) Finland's Balancing Act: The Labor Market, Humanitarian Relief, and
Immigrant Integration Migration Information Source URL:
http://www.migrationinformation.org/feature/display.cfm?ID=825
Vertovec, S. (2011) The emergence of Super-Diversity in Britain. WP-06-25.Compas: Centre on
Migration, Policy and Society.