Budd l hall

13 May 2015
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
Budd l hall
1 sur 17

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Emerging leadership themes MAELM final pptEmerging leadership themes MAELM final ppt
Emerging leadership themes MAELM final pptFrederic Fovet
Teaching Democracy and Active Citizenship through Citizenship Education: How ...Teaching Democracy and Active Citizenship through Citizenship Education: How ...
Teaching Democracy and Active Citizenship through Citizenship Education: How ...Paulina Pospieszna
CSO KEY ASKSCSO KEY ASKS
CSO KEY ASKSDr Lendy Spires
Atina ppt sonAtina ppt son
Atina ppt sonUgur Demiray
Gender-Responsive Social Protection, Care & COVID-19 A Feminist Analysis of P...Gender-Responsive Social Protection, Care & COVID-19 A Feminist Analysis of P...
Gender-Responsive Social Protection, Care & COVID-19 A Feminist Analysis of P...UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti
DESA News August 2013DESA News August 2013
DESA News August 2013Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA)

Similaire à Budd l hall

Universities and Social Commitment ObservatoryUniversities and Social Commitment Observatory
Universities and Social Commitment Observatorysonajera
Symposium on Mainstreaming University Community Research Partnerships - Event...Symposium on Mainstreaming University Community Research Partnerships - Event...
Symposium on Mainstreaming University Community Research Partnerships - Event...PRIA (Society for Participatory Research In Asia)
Co-Constructing Democratic Knowledge for Social Justice: Lessons from an Inte...Co-Constructing Democratic Knowledge for Social Justice: Lessons from an Inte...
Co-Constructing Democratic Knowledge for Social Justice: Lessons from an Inte...iBoP Asia
Co-Constructing Democratic Knowledge for Social Justice: Lessons from an Inte...Co-Constructing Democratic Knowledge for Social Justice: Lessons from an Inte...
Co-Constructing Democratic Knowledge for Social Justice: Lessons from an Inte...iBoP Asia
Universities & Public EngagementUniversities & Public Engagement
Universities & Public EngagementEuropean University Association
Against boundaries: Dismantling the Curriculum in Higher EducationAgainst boundaries: Dismantling the Curriculum in Higher Education
Against boundaries: Dismantling the Curriculum in Higher EducationRichard Hall

Similaire à Budd l hall(20)

Plus de IAU_Past_Conferences

Photo albumPhoto album
Photo albumIAU_Past_Conferences
Conclusion eva egron polakConclusion eva egron polak
Conclusion eva egron polakIAU_Past_Conferences
Tremblay and HallTremblay and Hall
Tremblay and HallIAU_Past_Conferences
Welcome plenary eva egron polakWelcome plenary eva egron polak
Welcome plenary eva egron polakIAU_Past_Conferences
Rémi quirionRémi quirion
Rémi quirionIAU_Past_Conferences
Sijbolt noordaSijbolt noorda
Sijbolt noordaIAU_Past_Conferences

Dernier

Personl Brand Exploration-Keynote- Tony ArcPersonl Brand Exploration-Keynote- Tony Arc
Personl Brand Exploration-Keynote- Tony ArcAresvpNy
ff.pptxff.pptx
ff.pptxAmanMalviya14
Congruency vs EqualityCongruency vs Equality
Congruency vs EqualityManik Bhola
Info Session on HackathonsInfo Session on Hackathons
Info Session on HackathonsGDSCCVR
First five stanzas of Song of the Rain.pptxFirst five stanzas of Song of the Rain.pptx
First five stanzas of Song of the Rain.pptxAncyTEnglish
The Civil War in One Day v2.pptxThe Civil War in One Day v2.pptx
The Civil War in One Day v2.pptxMatthew Caggia

Budd l hall

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. Who do we recognize as legitimate knowledge producers in our societies? Transformative and democratic approaches to knowledge democracy refers to acknowledging the existence of multiple epistemologies or ways of knowing, affirming that knowledge is both created and represented in multiple forms. We need to challenge ideas about ‘dominant knowledge’ residing in the hands of experts and engage with the majority in ways that make connections between knowledge, action and consciousness. We also have to question the dominance of the rational-scientific paradigm as the only valid knowledge system. We need to understand the relationships between scientific knowledge and other forms of knowledge and reconsider the value we attribute to different types and sources of knowledge. We need to go deeper in questioning the idea of an absolute truth, dealing openly with complexity and uncertainty. This implies six deep changes in the way we perceive value and create knowledge: To move from a mono-culture of scientific knowledge to an ecology of knowledge; from rational knowledge to integral human knowledge; from descriptive knowledge to knowledge for intervention; from partial knowledge to a holistic and complex knowledge; from an isolated creation of knowledge to a social co-creation of knowledge; from a static use of knowledge to a dynamic and creative knowledge.
  2. HE systems worldwide have to go beyond educating professionals to educating citizens with an ethical awareness and civic commitment. This deep change in the purpose of education implies a change in the curriculum contents, in the educative offer and in the conception of what a degree is and what it is preparing students for, that shouldn’t be any more disciplinary. On the other hand, today we know that reality is complex, that any phenomenon, problem or situation we live or create is multidimensional. It implies new ways of educating that demands deeper changes in pedagogies. New approaches for learning based on dialogical, co-learning, participatory and problem-oriented methods are also required. Disciplinary studies should make connections with real world and real-time issues in the future. New, critical and reflexive learning systems need also to be incorporated.
  3. Citizen groups, associations, NGOs, not-for-profit research institutes and independent think tanks, as civil society actors, have taken a leading role in identifying, analysing and articulating national and transnational debates on positive social transformation in the last few decades. Higher education institutions should establish stronger relationships with civic associations, and with social movements in order to co-create knowledge. New approaches to knowledge mobilisation and transfer are needed between institutions and their communities related to real problems. Greater coordination is needed between governments, civil society, educative institutions and the private sector in order to achieve this social transformation. Participatory action research and Science Shop experiences worldwide are two of many promising ways to move forward.
  4. Community can also apply more broadly to a sense of communal responsibility on a national or even international scale. Higher Education has the opportunity, in collaboration with civil society and other knowledge workers to lead society in generating knowledge to address global challenges such as food security, climate change, water management, intercultural dialogue, renewable energy and public health and the care of infants, toddlers and their families… Linking research agendas to collective challenges and the global development agenda, making evident connections between academic activity and societal needs, is also a challenge for near future. This approach implies redefining multiple and simultaneous spaces that all could be call ‘community’ at diverse levels. We must assume that these diverse levels of communities are interdependent and no real solutions will be sustainably reached if we don’t work on all them simultaneously.
  5. Engaged scholarship and community based research further complicate the knowledge-engagement-career picture. The evidence is that the policy climate within the academic world about how to recognize excellence in community-based research and engaged scholarship is advancing. We are confident that these new ways of working will in time drive a change in the ways that we measure the impact of scholarship. The policies to support these changes are already emerging and will continue to do so. Numerous national, regional, sectorial and global networks have emerged over the past years with an overall objective of building the movement of community university engagement for purposes of being better able to contribute to meeting the critical issues of our times. These networks have several goals: building the institutional capacity for CUE, building capacity amongst community groups, development knowledge systems, policy development and advocacy and providing opportunities for collaboration. The constellation of CUE networks provides a kind of circulation system for ideas, good practices, policy language and simply inspiration.