Indigenous forests are being degraded due to a lack of alternative livelihoods, forcing people to fell trees for low-return charcoal production. Complex regulations and a lack of coordination among government ministries have made conservation difficult. The document presents a conceptual framework for analyzing the charcoal value chain within a landscape context, including production, transport, use and the various actors and factors involved at each stage. It aims to develop a landscape approach for sustainable charcoal management through multi-stakeholder coordination, improved policies, regeneration of woodlands and alternative livelihoods.
1. Livelihoods,
charcoal,
ecosystem…
• Indigenous
forests
of
precious
hardwood
species,
breeding
sites
for
wild
animals
• Lack
of
alterna9ve
livelihoods,
need
for
pasture,
promp9ng
tree
felling
for
charcoal
for
small
return
• Difficulty
of
controlling
produc9on
and
trades
and
to
conserve
with
complex
directories
and
lack
of
clear
responsibili9es
among
ministries
in
charge
2. Drivers of degradation
across landscape
Activities, actors, formal/informal multi-
sectoral regulatory frameworks across
different stages of value chain/landscape
Rural forests,
woodlands, range-
lands, farmlands
Production &
processing
Transport
End-use
Value chain
Road networks
Urban markets,
settlements
Retail by city traders
Consumption by urban
households
Carbonization by farmers /
charcoal burners
Wood harvest by farmers
Collection by
middlemen
Wholesale
by dealers
Energy
Sector
Local
Authority,
Police
Forestry
Sector
Agricul.
Sector
Land, tree
tenure
Growing
demand for
charcoal along
urbanization
Extensive tree
exploitation
Poverty, income
needs
Unclear
regulatory
frameworks,
room for
corruption,
bribes
Damaged ecosystem services,
loss of resilience
Perceived free
resources
Lifestyle change
Trade-offs
Unaffordability of
alternative energy
Lack of
incentives to
adopt
sustainable
technologies
Squeezed
margins for
charcoal
producers
Longer
supply
distance,
higher
footprints
Charcoal
Economics
in
Landscape
Context
–
Conceptual
Framework
3. goal
–
sustainable
charcoal
• Compara9ve
studies
between
African
countries,
and
even
Asia/La9n
America…
Rwanda
Case
Price
(RWF)
/32kg
Price
(USD)/kg
Producer
margin
Nyungwe
4,000
RWF
0.18
$/kg
Butare
city
5,500-‐6,000RW
F
0.24-‐0.26
$/kg
66-‐72%
Kigali
city
7,500
RWF
0.33
$/kg
53%
Kenya
Case
Price
(KSH)
/35.7kg
Price
(USD)/kg
Producer
margin
Farm
gate
price
KFS
-‐
438
Ksh
(Mara
-‐
100ksh)
0.14
$/kg
(0.03$)
Nairobi
price
1,949ksh
0.61
$/kg
22%
(5%)
(casu
(Keny
Rwanda
• Only
Forestry
Dep
–
Ministry
of
Natural
Resources
is
a
responsible
authority.
• A
land
owner
to
clear
a
plot
over
0.25
ha,
transporters
obtain
permits
from
District
Gov
which
controls
all
the
revenue,
while
Na9onal
Government
does
not
interfere.
• Charcoal
is
a
rela9vely
profitable
business
while
the
same
Eucalyptus
can
serve
mul9-‐
purposes
–
firewood,
9mber,
bean
stakes.
• In
sum,
the
impacts
of
centralized
policies,
decentralized
implementa9on,
higher
margins
for
landowner/producers,
mul9-‐
purpose
trees
compa9ble
with
local
crop-‐
livestock
systems,
are
key
4. Expected outcomes
across landscape
Landscape approach for sustainable
charcoal
Rural forests,
woodlands, range-
lands, farmlands
Production &
processing
Transport
End-use
Value chain
Road networks
Urban markets,
settlements
Multi-stakeholder
management structure to
handle externalities
Tree planting,
regeneration
Sustained income
Clear regulatory
frameworks,
little room for
corruption,
bribes
Enhanced ecosystem services,
Improved resilience
Right valuation of
resources
Synergies
Retail by city traders
Carbonization by farmers /
charcoal burners
Wood harvest by farmers
Collection by
middlemen
Wholesale
by dealers
Inter-sectoral coordination
to get the policy
environment right
Consumption by urban
households
Affordability of
efficient devices
Lifestyle change
Shorter
supply
distance,
lower
footprints
Moderate
demand for
charcoal
along
urbanization
Adoption of
sustainable
technologies
Higher
margins for
charcoal
producers
Charcoal
Economics
in
Landscape
Context
–
Conceptual
Framework