1. An analytical Review of the literature on e-feedback Andrea Neville Education 6610, Memorial University Fall 2010

2. 2,6,9 Feedback

3. 1,9 E-Feedback

4. Selection Criteria

6. Methods

7. Process of analysis

8. Themes identified

9. Acceptance of e-feedback

10. Type and frequency of e-feedback

11. Staff preferences for e-feedback

12. Reasons to use e-feedback

13. Motivation to participate in e-feedback

14. Student performance after e-feedback

15. Cautions for integration of e-feedback

16. Discussion

17. Conclusions

18. Implications

19. Limitations

20. References 1. Butchart, S., Forster, D., Gold, I., Bigelow, J., Korb, K., Oppy, G., & Serrenti, A. (2009). Improving critical thinking using web based argument mapping exercises with automated feedback. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 268-291. 2. Chang, N. (2010). Can students improve learning with their use of an instructor's extensive feedback assessment process? International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, (May 2009), 1-15. 3. Economides, A. (2009). Conative feedback in computer-based assessment. Computers in the Schools, 26(3), 207-223. doi: 10.1080/07380560903095188. 4. Egan, C., Jefferies, A., Johal, J., & Loomes, M. (2006). Providing fine-grained feedback within an on-line learning system–Identifying the workers from the lurkers and the shirkers. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 4(1), 115. Academic Conferences Limited.

21. References 5. Gill, M., & Greenhow, M. (2008). How effective is feedback in Computer-Aided Assessments? Learning, Media and Technology, 33(3), 207-220. doi: 10.1080/17439880802324145. 6. Hatziapostolou, T., & Paraskakis, I. (2010). Enhancing the impact of formative feedback on student learning through an online feedback system. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 8(2), 111–122. Retrieved from http://www.ejel.org/Volume-8/v8-i2/Hatziapostolou_and_Paraskakis.pdf. 7. Heinrich, E., Milne, J., & Moore, M. (2009). An investigation into e-tool use for formative assignment assessment–status and recommendations. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 176–192. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/12_4/16.pdf.

22. References 8. Jordan, S., & Mitchell, T. (2009). e-Assessment for learning? The potential of short-answer free-text questions with tailored feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 371-385. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00928.x. 9. Lilley, M., & Barker, T. (2007). Students’ perceived usefulness of formative feedback for a computer-adaptive test. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 5(1), 31-38. 10. Nix, I., & Wyllie, A. (2009). Exploring design features to enhance computer-based assessment: Learners' views on using a confidence-indicator tool and computer-based feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00992.x.

23. References 11. Pyke, J., & Sherlock, J. (2010). A closer look at instructor-student feedback online: A case study analysis of the types and frequency. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 110-121. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no1/pyke_0310.htm. 12. Walker, D., Topping, K., & Rodrigues, S. (2008). Student reflections on formative e-assessment: expectations and perceptions. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(3), 221-234. doi: 10.1080/17439880802324178. 13. Whitelock, D., Watt, S., Raw, Y., & Moreale, E. (2003). Analysing tutor feedback to students: First steps towards constructing an electronic monitoring system. Alt-J Research in Learning Technology, 11(3), 31-42. doi: 10.1080/0968776030110304.

24. References 14. Yeh, S., & Lo, J. (2009). Using online annotations to support error correction and corrective feedback. Computers & Education, 52(4), 882-892. Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.014. 15. Yousefzadeh, M. (2010). Computer–based feedback vs. instructor–provided feedback and second language learners' reading comprehension. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, (July), 1-13.