Five things every teacher needs to know about research

‘FIVE THINGS EVERY TEACHER
NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT
RESEARCH’
8 February 2019
16:00 – 16:30
Christian Bokhove
JUSCO
This is the web-version of the
slides. If you feel I haven’t
referenced a source
appropriately, or you otherwise
object to the use of some
content, please let me know.

Who am I ?
• Christian Bokhove
• Was maths and computer science teacher from 1998-
2012 in a secondary school in the Netherlands
• PhD in 2011 at Utrecht University
• Now Associate Professor at the University
of Southampton, United Kingdom
• Mathematics education
• Large-scale assessment (TIMSS, PISA)
• Research methods
• Social media contrarian

Today
• I’ve had many discussions about
research on social media.
• It sometimes seems as if we are
talking past eachother rather
than with eachother.
• I think this is related to
underpinning visions on
education.
• Such underpinning ideas are
crucial for mutual
understanding.
• This presentation tries to
contribute to this.
• Based on my writings in the
Times Educational Supplement,
lovingly augmented with ‘the
best of Twitter’.
https://is.gd/5researchthings

Education Research
• ‘Evidence-informed’ v ‘evidence-based’: still evidence but
takes into account the nature of social sciences.
• But what is it any way? Multidisciplinary…
• Sociology
• Economics
• Psychology
• Pedagogy
• ….
• Every discipline has its own set of assumptions and
methods (and paradigms)
• “dealing with so many variables that are extremely hard to
(all) control.” (Neelen & Kirschner’s blog, 2018)
https://3starlearningexperiences.wordpress.com/2018/06/26/working-in-an-evidence-informed-way/

Five age-old discussions…
1. Education research creates a ‘lesser form of
knowledge’?
2. Cause and effect
3. One swallow does not make a summer: paradigms
4. Context
5. Quantification and measurement
This requires a knowledgebase….

1. ‘LESSER FORM OF
KNOWLEDGE’

Labaree (1998)
• Challenges of education research
• Humans are unpredictable
• Interaction between the researcher and what he/she
studies
• Labaree: ‘soft knowledge’.

As a result…
Negatives
• Lower status in academia
• Less authority with policy makers
• Pressure to be more like the ‘hard sciences’
No hard truths: a few years later there can be other insights
(related to ‘publish and perish’)
Positives
• Inherently ‘in middle of society’
• Less consumer pressures
So Labaree says: let’s utilise those positives..

"A TREATISE OF
HUMAN NATURE"
Causality is a product of our
experiences
Causality is a ‘habit of mind’
It’s fiction
Problem: spurious correlations.
How can we ever know causality?

Kant’s reaction…
• Hume’s work made Kant wake up from his ‘dogmatic
slumber’.
• Wrote the Prolegomena.
• Kant could not agree with a conclusion that causality is
just fiction.
• Kant reflected on this and thought about how to formulate
causality a priori
• No space for in-depth discussion of this but the point is
not who is right but that these topics have been discussed
for centuries…

So we need to be cautious….
http://tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations

But sometimes common sense…
https://www.economist.com/graphic-
detail/2016/04/01/ice-cream-and-iq

Example: achievement - motivation
• If you are good at something, you will enjoy doing it
more….
• But a challenge is ‘what if you are not so good at it’ (and
this can also be relative in a classroom) ….
• If you like doing something, you will probably be or
become better at it.
It is reasonable to say the relation is bidirectional.

Logical positivism: seen by many as ‘standard’
• Two sources of knowledge:
empirical data and logical
reasoning.
• Science is cumulative,
‘progressive’.
• Scientism: only science
provides true knowledge.
• Science should be free from
values (objectivism).
• Tasks of philosophy of
science is normative.
https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/57753_Chapter_3.pptx
No, don’t think this is a
pejorative. It’s a perfectly
normal term in the
philosophy of science.

Critics of positivism
Quine
Sellars
Wittgenstein
Hanson
Kuhn
Popper
Lakatos
Feyerabend

Critics of positivism
Early criticism was epistemological: emphasised “scientific
objectivity cannot exist by virtue of neutral observation of
alleged pure data out of the outside world; objective
observations in this sense are not possible at all.”
Quine: observation statements are part of
whole theories.
Wittgenstein II: the meaning of a word is dependent on
the language game of which it is a part;
therefore its meaning is shown by how it is used.
Hanson: observation is theory laden;
to see is to see as.

Karl Popper (1902–1994) Logical positivism:
• induction;
• generalisation;
• verification;
A generalisation can’t be verified
A generalisation can be falsified
(Black/white swan)
Science is risk-taking. Verification is not interesting.

B&LdeJ 21
Imre Lakatos (1922–1974)
Dogmatism/conservatism within research programs
and progress and rational choice between programs:
relativism can be avoided:
• Degenerating research program: just more and
more ad-hoc hypotheses;
• Progressive research programs: ad-hoc
hypotheses lead to new predictions, data,
applications;
• Competition: rational choice, not just mob
psychology (contra Kuhn);
• Post-hoc, no a priori demarcation (contra
falsificationism).

The hardest science of them all
• Berliner (2002)
• Local conditions make generalisations hard
• Need context to put in perspective
• This is not relativism
• Example Project Follow Through
• ‘Planned variation’
• Direct Instruction on average very effective
• But the variation of the different implementations perhaps larger
than between different approaches. Also see this in curriculum
project.

5. QUANTIFICATION AND
MEASUREMENT

• Labaree again, nu 2011 in “THE LURE OF STATISTICS
FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERS”
• History of ‘statistics’
• From German Statistik, from New Latin statisticum (“of the
state”) and Italian statista (“statesman, politician”).
Statistik introduced by Gottfried Achenwall (1749),
originally designated the analysis of data about the state.
• Aim was to improve credibility and stature, policy
influence.

• Forcing a rectangular grid on a spherical world.
Two problems, according to Labaree (2011):
• Can affect local practical knowledge.
• What are we measuring anyway? (fMRI, SES, mindset,
load). Might detract from that what can’t be measured
easily.
Maybe better to combine qualitative and quantitative
methods. Research questions can lead.

Complex diagram or table
(Muijs & Bokhove, 2017)

What is being measured?
• Teacher-directed
• Perceived feedback
• Adaptive instruction
• Enquiry-based
instruction
Source: PISA

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2017.00037/full

Example ‘learning’
• “change in long-term
memory” (Kirschner,
Sweller & Clark, 2006)
• But how measure?
Performance/learning
(Soderstrom & Bjork (2015)
• Willingham (2017):
depends on theory.
https://is.gd/onlearning

Many definitions…
• Product (end result) or
process? (Lachman, 1997)
• Learning as the processing
of information or
experience
• Learning defined as
behavioural change
• Learning defined as
changes in behavioural
mechanisms
These views complement
each other (Barron et al,
2015).

What to take away from this?
1. Education research creates a ‘lesser form of
knowledge’?
Not much point in comparing education research with the
natural sciences. Research into education
(multidisciplinary) has its own strengths.

2. Cause and effect
Correlation is not causation but it’s good to probe a little bit
deeper. Sometimes only one direction is plausible,
sometimes both directions.

3. One swallow does not make a summer: paradigms
Your view on science (paradigm) determines whether one
swallow makes a summer or not. My view would be that
one study does not negate other bodies of research. So if
you notice one particular study is cited all the time….have a
further look as well.

4. Context
We can carefully generalise over contexts but there always
is a context. You better understand the strengths and
limitations of a study by exploring the context as well.

5. Quantification and measurement
Measurement gives us important information but it is
important to know what you are measuring. Try to find out
what information actually led to the conclusions in a piece
of research.

So make sure…
• You read read read… (unfortunately this can take quite
some time).
• Be critical.
• Postpone hard conclusions.
• Steel manning: try to construct the best argument for the
opposite you believe in.
• Be alert about terminology (definitions).
• You can disagree politely.

Thank you
• C.Bokhove@soton.ac.uk
• Twitter: @cbokhove
• Website: www.bokhove.net
There are only two types
of people in the world:
those who believe in false
dichotomies, and
penguins.

References
Barron, A.B., Hebets, E.A., Cleland, T.A., Fitzpatrick, C.L., Hauber, M.E., & Stevens, J.R. (2015). Embracing
multiple definitions of learning. Trends in Neurosciences, 38(7), 405-407. Open access version at
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1058&context=bioscihebets
Berliner, D.C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An
analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching.
Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.
Lachman, S.J. (1997). Learning is a Process: Toward an Improved Definition of Learning. The Journal of
Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied. 131(5), p. 477-480.
Soderstrom, N.C., & Bjork, R.A. (2015). Learning Versus Performance: An Integrative Review. Perspectives on
Psychological Science, 10(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569000
Willingham, D.T. (2017). On the Definition of Learning.... Available on http://www.danielwillingham.com/daniel-
willingham-science-and-education-blog/on-the-definition-of-learning
Labaree, D.F. (1998). Educational researchers: Living with a lesser form of knowledge. Educational
Researcher, 27(8), 4-12.
Labaree, D.F. (2011). The lure of statistics for educational researchers. Educational Theory, 61(6), 621-632.
Muijs, D., & Bokhove, C. (2017). Postgraduate student satisfaction: a multilevel analysis of PTES data. British
Educational Research Journal, 43(5), 904-930. DOI: 10.1002/berj.3294
Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load
approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429-434.

Five things every teacher needs to know about research

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (20)

Similaire à Five things every teacher needs to know about research

Similaire à Five things every teacher needs to know about research (20)

Plus de Christian Bokhove

Plus de Christian Bokhove (20)

Dernier

Dernier (20)

Five things every teacher needs to know about research