2. Research
Editorial supply chain and journal
management structure: journals
Author Editor
Publisher/
Managing
Editor
Production Users
Quality research
papers
EAB and reviewers
Solicits new
papers
Handles review
process
Promotes journal
to peers
Attends
conferences
Develops new
areas of coverage
The link between the
publishing company
and editor
Helps editors
succeed in their role
and build a first class
journal
Overall responsibility
for journal
Promotion and
marketing
Attends conferences
Handles production
issues
QA – sub-editing
and proof reading
Convert to SGML
for online
databases
Print production
Despatch
Added value from
publisher
Access via
library
Hard copy
Database
Third party
4.
What journal should you
submit to?
Higher Education
Pedagogies
Teaching in Higher
Education
Higher education
Journal generally
Discipline specific
5.
Let do it!
Form group
Think of ideas or how
to generate idea
Consider journals
Reflect on the process
6.
A social practice including:
Coordination
Communication (negotiation)
Cooperation
External factors
What is Collaborative
Writing?
7. Group size : Small Vs. Large
Social status of members : Equal Vs. Hierarchical
Time : Synchronous Vs. Asynchronous
Space : Distributed or at the same place
Text length
Types of text
Different conceptions of the task among collaborators
Individual goals Vs. Group’s
Complexity and Diversity
10.
Routing procedures
the material between the members
Version control
Commenting Strategies
E-mail
Inserting the comments in the original
document
Annotation features in your word processor.
Issues in Collaborative
Writing
11.
"A Review of the use of
Action Research in
Higher Education",
Case Study
12.
Paul Gibbs, Patricia Cartney, Kate Wilkinson, John
Parkinson, Sheila Cunningham, Carl James-Reynolds,
Tarek Zoubir, Venetia Brown, Phil Barter, Pauline
Sumner, Angus MacDonald, Asanka Dayananda &
Alexandra Pitt
Education Action Research
The Team & Journal
13.
This literature review considers the use of action
research in higher education. The review specifically
looks at two areas of higher education activity. The first
concerns academic teaching practice and includes a
discussion of research and pedagogy practice, and staff
development. The second considers student
engagement. In both of these core features of higher
education, action research has proven to be a central
approach to the investigation, reflection and
improvement of practice. Each of these main foci
includes a discussion of the limitations of the literature.
The review illustrates the extent and range of uses to
have benefited from an action research approach.
Outcome
14.
Interest judging meeting
Establish common goal, trust and leadership
(Patricia Cartney)
Set objectives
Decide on writing and synthesis process
Review and critique
Dealing with publisher and reviewers
Process
15.
In some ways this is an interesting read but I have a
number of reservations that temper my enthusiasm
for the paper.
This is an incredibly ambitious yet potentially very
useful paper exploring the application of action
research in higher education (HE) through various
lenses.
16.
This paper is interesting for the Journal audience and
makes a relevant contribution, specially for its
combination of lesson studies and action learning.
Second response