This document summarizes a presentation about how NICE guidelines can help improve care for older people. It discusses three NICE guidelines on home care, care for older adults with multiple long-term conditions, and transitions between hospital and community care. Common themes across the guidelines include person-centered care, supporting carers, assessment and care planning, integrated working, and information sharing. The presentation provides examples of how practitioners can apply the guideline recommendations in their work.
Improving the quality of care and support for older people: How can the NICE guidelines help? Webinar
1. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Improving the quality of care and support
for older people: How can the NICE
guidelines help?
Lisa Smith: Research in Practice for Adults
2. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
• Overview of NICE guideline development
• Highlights and recommendations from the guidelines:
– Home care: delivering personal care and practical support
to older people living in their own homes
– Older people with social care needs and multiple long term
conditions
– Transition between inpatient hospital settings and
community or care home settings for adults with social
care needs
• What does that mean for practice?
3. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
POLL- Are you using the NICE
guidelines in your practice? Yes/No
4. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
National Institute for
Health and Care
Excellence (NICE)
Commissioner
Social Care
Institute for
Excellence (SCIE)
Lead partner
Personal Social
Services Research
Unit
(PSSRU)
Evidence for Policy
and Practice
Information and
Co-ordinating
Centre
(EPPI)
Research in
Practice
(RiP)
Research in
Practice for Adults
(RiPfA)
5. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
• Address transition to/from other services
• Recognise the diversity of the social care workforce
• Make links with wider policy and regulatory context
• Focus on choice, control and independence
• Draw on different types of knowledge
• Recognise importance of both process and outcome
• Adopt a broad analytic perspective
• Use preference-weighted measures and/or modelling
• Complement economic analyses with GDG/expert opinion
Guidance should explicitly address the
need for integrated working
Social care interventions and outcomes are
complex and multi-dimensional
Measuring and valuing the effects of
interventions needs pragmatism
6. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Research evidence
Practice evidence
Evidence on views and experiences
People who use services, carers, practitioners, commissioners
7. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Scope
Baseline
service
assessment
Systematic
evidence
review
Expert opinion
8. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Home Care: delivering personal care and
practical support to older people living in
their own homes
9. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Need for guideline
• In 2013/14 883,000 people in UK made use of home care support; 326
million hours of care was delivered (UKHCA, 2015)
• Nearly ¾ of these are supported by local authority but year-on-year decline
in numbers of people state-funded (UKHCA, 2015)
• A number of reports into the home care sector have raised concerns about
the quality of services
• Key issues identified include people using home care services experience
poor support, neglect and/or compromised dignity and human rights
(EHRC, 2011)
• Some home care workers may not have the knowledge or skill of how best
to care for people - particularly in relation to dementia – and how to work
in a coordinated way (CQC, 2013)
10. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Recommendation themes
Creative Commons license image credit: jbarahona.com
CHOICE,
CONTROL,
DIGNITY AND RESPECT
ENSURING CARE IS PERSON-CENTRED
PROVIDING INFORMATION INTEGRATED WORKING
RECRUITING, TRAINING AND
SUPPORTING WORKERS
DELIVERING HOME CARE
ENSURING SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDING
PEOPLE
PLANNING HOME CARE
11. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Implementation challenges
• Delivering services that support the aspirations, goals
and priorities of the person
• Working together to ensure care and support is
coordinated
• Strategic partnership working to deliver high quality and
integrated home care
12. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Older people with social care needs and
multiple long term conditions
13. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Need for guidance
• Most users of adult social care services have one or more LTC. Estimated
annual health and social care cost per person per year is £3,000 for
those with one LTC, and to £8000 for those with three (compared to
£1000 to those without)
• Having one or more LTCs places people at greater risk of mental health
problems, but services may not identify the need for assessment and
treatment
• People are less likely to be able to self manage a physical health
condition if they are struggling with mental ill health
• There is evidence that older people who have had a long-term mental
health problem have poorer physical health outcomes than the general
population
14. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Recommendation themes
Creative Commons license image credit: jbarahona.com
CHOICE,
CONTROL,
DIGNITY AND RESPECT
IDENTIFYING AND ASSESSING SOCIAL
CARE NEEDS
INTEGRATED CARE PLANNING
SUPPORTING CARERS
TRAINING HEALTH AND SOCIAL
CARE PROFESSIONALS
DELIVERING CARE
PREVENTING SOCIAL ISOLATION
15. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Implementation challenges
• Empowering older people with social care needs and
multiple long-term conditions and their carers to
choose and manage their own support
• Empowering practitioners to deliver person-centred
care
• Integrating different care and support options to
enable person-centred care
16. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Transition between inpatient hospital settings
and community or care home settings for adults
with social care needs
17. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Need for guidance
• The negative effects of poor transitions are felt both at the
system and individual level (House of Commons, 2003; Lynch,
2011)
• Figures released for Jan 2014 show that on the last of the
month, 2683 patients in acute care settings had a Delayed
Transfer of Care (DTOC), during the month there were a total of
123,306 delayed days, 69.4% of delays were attributable to the
NHS, 24.6% were attributable to social care and 6% were
attributable to both agencies
18. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Creative Commons license image credit: jbarahona.com
CHOICE,
CONTROL,
DIGNITY AND RESPECT
DISCHARGE PLANNING
PERSON CENTRED CARE
Recommendation themes
COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION
SHARING
INTEGRATED WORKING
SUPPORT AND TRAINING FOR CARERS
ASSESSMENT AND CARE PLANNING
19. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Implementation challenges
• Improving understanding of person-centred care
• Ensuring health and social care practitioners
communicate effectively
• Changing how community and hospital-based staff
work together to ensure coordinated, person-centred
support
20. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Common themes
• Person-centred care
• Supporting carers
• Assessment and care planning
• Integrated working
• Information and communication
22. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Person-centred care
• Use the guideline to support you to understand gaps the
resources on the NICE website include baseline
assessment tools
• Learning from Making Safeguarding Personal
• Outcomes focused ways of working
• Co-production
• http://www.nationalvoices.org.uk/
http://www.thinklocalactpersonal.org.uk/
http://www.scie.org.uk
23. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Supporting carers
• Use the Care Act 2014 as a lever
• Co-production
• Training for carers (Caring with confidence)
• Skills for Care resources
• NHS commitment to carers
• Work with local carer groups
24. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Assessment and care planning
• Care Act 2014 principles:
– Begin with person’s views, wishes, feelings and beliefs
– Think about prevention
– Don’t make assumptions
– Ensure participation
– Balancing adult and carer needs
– Protection from abuse and neglect
– Minimising restrictions
• Good assessments lead to good care planning
25. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Integrated working
• Multiple models of integrated working
• Guidelines contain a lot of detail as to how this can be
achieved
– Joint training opportunities
– Establish named care coordinator roles
– Review local relationships
• Better Care Fund - how to guide
26. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Information and communication
• Importance of good information for people
• Opportunity for making good use of advocacy with
requirements of the Care Act 2014
• Good communication:
– Improved coordination, therefore a better experience and
outcome
– Clarity about the needs and preferences of individuals
• Information sharing protocols
• IT systems..
27. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
How might the guidelines help?
• Useful framework
• Provides some leverage where there might be resistance
to change
• Conscious competence
• Enable organisations to identify gaps as well as areas of
good practice
28. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
POLL- do you now know how you
might use the guidelines? Yes/No
29. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
Have you any examples of good
practice that demonstrate the
implementation of guideline
recommendations?
32. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
• Workshop details
• https://www.ripfa.org.uk/latest-news/news-improving-the-quality-of-care/
• www.nationalvoices.org.uk
• www.thinklocalactpersonal.org.uk
• www.scie.org.uk
• www.skillsforcare.org.uk
• www.carers.org
• www.carersuk.org
• https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/pe/commitment-to-carers/
• Skills for Care
• Information and advice workbook (attached) could not find a web link
• Link to Sam’s Story
• http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/audio-video/joined-care-sams-story
• Better Care Fund
• https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/part-rel/transformation-fund/bcf-plan/
33. NICE Collaborating Centre for Social Care
• Links to the guidelines
• https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng27/chapter/Recommendations
• https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG21/chapter/Recommendations
• https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng22/chapter/Recommendations
• Social services and well-being act for Wales
• http://gov.wales/topics/health/socialcare/act/?lang=en
• http://www.legislation.gov.uk/anaw/2014/4/contents
Notes de l'éditeur
Different types of knowledge
Reviewing evidence in context
Impact at the individual and system levels
Hospital discharge, readmission, LoS, ED visits,
Explore in further detail poor experience for the individual and their family
Explore further poor outcomes- less independence, social isolation, less choice and control, health outcomes, risk of re-admission,
Poor experience- dissatisfaction with care, worry for family about risks at home, feeling dependent, reliance on family, giving information multip
Question- anything else?
Theoretically nothing- these are all things that we do already- what the guidelines serve to do in many ways is a re-inforcement of what ‘good’ looks like in social care.
Thoughts from the chatpod- is there anything we need to do differently?
Is there anything in your local area that you could do differently to support good person-centred practice? Outcomes focused? Making Safeguarding Personal
http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/elearning/person-centred-practice/
http://www.nationalvoices.org.uk/evidence
Person-centred care involves placing people at the forefront of their health and care. It ensures people retain control, helps them make informed decisions and supports a partnership between individuals, families and services.
Some of the main components of person-centred care involve:
• supporting self-management
• supporting shared decision-making
• enhancing experience of healthcare
• improving information and understanding, and
• promoting prevention
Learning from making safeguarding personal
Outcomes focused.
Not ‘what’s the matter with me, but what matters to me?’
IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU NEED TO DO DIFFERNETLY
The Care Act sets out parity of esteem for carers, so that they are able to gain support from the Local Authority in their own right. This is a step change in the delivery of care and support for carers.
Carers Trust and Carers UK resources
http://www.skillsforcare.org.uk/Documents/Topics/Supporting-carers/Common-core-principles-for-working-with-carers.pdf
http://php.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/research/summs/confidence.php
https://www.carersuk.org/news-and-campaigns/news/caring-with-confidence-new-programme-for-carers
https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/pe/commitment-to-carers/
riPfA are currently doing some work on behalf of DH to develop tools to support good practice with carers- we recently held a workshop with carers- we asked the group to talk about their wish list for practice do’s and don’ts
Practice do’s and don’ts
DO
• Be calm and human
• Explain what a carers assessment is (that it’s about our needs, not an assessment of our caring ability)
• Set out expectations
• Talk about what can be done, rather than what can’t
• Ask the carer if they would like a joint assessment or not
• Be knowledgeable of services and possible options for help
• Come prepared, having read the notes
• See the carer as an asset
• Make me feel as if I’m in a support network helping to support the person I care for – not that it’s a battle I have to fight against everyone else
• See beyond me as just a carer
DON’T
• Use jargon or buzzwords (both in writing and when speaking)
• Don’t appear to be, or be in a rush
• Be overly clinical/detached
• Don’t say you’re going to do something if it’s not realistic
• Don’t assume can do forms/paperwork without support
• Don’t be afraid of saying “I’ll get back to you as I don’t know the answer”
• Don’t say ‘only the carer’
• Don’t make assumptions about the carers likes or abilities
CHATPOD QUESTION IS THERE ANYTHING YOU NEED TO DO DIFFERENTLY?
SCIE resources
RiPfA resources
What the evidence says
Arguably good assessment underpins person centred care
Wealth of resources- see end slide.
The guidance also make some specific reference to forward planning- particularly with discharge planning- and also links in to information sharing and good communication.
King’s Fund
RiPfA resources
Vanguards, pioneers, better care fund
The King’s Fund report Place-based systems of care argues that providers of services should work together to improve health and care for the populations they serve. This means organisations collaborating to manage the common resources available to them rather than each organisation adopting a ‘fortress mentality’ in which it acts to secure its own future regardless of the impact on others. The King's Fund November 2015
Managers need to assess the factors affecting integrated working in their areas, and motivate and support practitioners to adopt attitudes and behaviours that support person‑centred approaches. Changing attitudes can be challenging, particularly if there are pressures on staff time and resources, and local capacity (or knowledge of alternative sources of support) is limited.
What can health and social care managers do to help?
Review local relationships across health, social care, housing and the voluntary sector and identify areas for improvement. Resources and organisations that can help include:
The Local Government Association, NHS England and their partners' resources and tools to improve integrated working through the Better Care Programme. The LGA's Integration and the Better Care Fund is a summary of programmes relating to integrated working for health and wellbeing boards, local authorities and their partners in the health and voluntary sectors. This includes the Better Care Exchange, which offers the opportunity to share learning across systems, and a series of practice guides, such as How to work together across health, care and beyond.
The Department of Health‑funded evaluation of the Homeless Hospital Discharge Fund shows that joint working across sectors reduces delayed transfers of care for homeless people with social care needs.
The Social Care Institute for Excellence's Dying at home: the case for integrated working provides examples from practice, including case studies showing how working together can help to meet people's preferences.
Establish a change programme that includes staff training based on the principles of the Care Act and the Mental Capacity Act, and the ambitions set out in the NHS Five Year Forward View. Depending on local needs and circumstances, the programme could draw on approaches identified in the Social Care Institute for Excellence's Organisational change in social care study resource.
What can commissioners, providers and voluntary sector and community organisations do to help?
Use existing forums or create new opportunities to meet people who use services and carers to review the quality of services for people living at home. Existing forums that could be used include health and wellbeing boards, quality forums and provider alliances.
Use this guideline to review what training about common health conditions is available for home care workers. Draw on examples of good person-centred practice to inform local health and wellbeing planning and help commissioning plans realise the intentions of the Care Act.
Consider innovative approaches and services that can support people to maintain links with their family and local community. The SCIE guide on commissioning home care for older people includes some practice examples to stimulate ideas.
Working across boundaries
Traditionally, health and social care services that support older people with social care needs and multiple long‑term conditions focus on managing separate health conditions, and the system is complex to navigate. Systems and structures may need to change to help professionals to work across service boundaries and specialisms.
To do this, managers and commissioners could:
Establish named care coordinators locally and ensure they have the authority to provide continuity of support and amend care and support plans as needed. Share information about their role and responsibilities widely to make sure it is fully understood.
Provide care coordinators with the necessary training and support based on a clear understanding of their role, and the skills and knowledge they need.
Review local relationships across health, social care and the voluntary sector and identify where more support is needed to work across service boundaries and professions. Resources such as The How to… guides produced to support the Better Care Fund can help with this.
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/bcf-user-guide-03.pdf.pdf
Good information resources- pull in the Skills for Care stuff
Generally people do not have a good understanding of adult social care and there may be stigma in approaching it (ADASS, 2011). Often people first seek information at a time of crisis (Bottery and Holloway, 2013). Information is affected by the complexity of the system and language used, and lack of join up between services. Since councils gatekeep services, it can be difficult for them to provide independent information. The quality of information is not always reliable, and technology can provide barriers to access. . (Anderson, 2011) There are more specific barriers for particular groups, for example, older people are less likely to use the internet or call centres (Horton, 2009), BME groups face cultural and linguistic barriers (Zahno and Rhule, 2008), self-funders may not be seen as a priority (Hudson and Henwood, 2009), and many people face difficulties with communication or capacity (IDEA, 2009). People who face stigma are less likely to engage with social care (RiPfA, 2013). People are more likely to seek information if they believe it will be available and accessible, relevant and understandable, useful and trustworthy. Involving customers in planning how information and advice are provided, having an organisational strategy and joining up with other agencies all help. Organisations should use a range of formats, media and places to provide information (IDEA, 2009). The third sector, including organisations led by users, can provide more independent information and advice to navigate the system (RiPfA, 2011b, 2012b). Tailored information and support is particularly important for groups who face barriers (Putting People First, 2009); often they will need face-to-face support (Zahno and Rhule, 2008). Personal relationships with individuals are important for access to information and advice. Social care staff and other professionals need skills and tools to signpost and advise people (Newbronner et al, 2011). Ideally, information and advice would be followed up on, and information services reviewed (RiPfA, 2013).
Good communication systems enable:
improved coordination of care and, therefore, a better experience for the person and improved outcomes
practitioners to have a clear understanding about people's health, social care and support needs and preferences and the role practitioners need to play to promote wellbeing
They might also enable more efficient and cost‑effective use of resources.
Poor coordination of care, and poor communication between and within teams, can lead to poorer outcomes and a poor experience of care. Local health and social care organisations need to establish communications protocols, procedures and systems. These should make best use of technology to enable data‑sharing between all practitioners involved in the care and support of people in the area (subject to information governance protocols).
Protocols for sharing information with people, their families and carers also need to be established to ensure that all communication arrangements are understood and used by all relevant practitioners.
IT systems are oft cited as the reason why information isn’t shared and why there isn’t good enough communication- Sam Jones Director, New Care Models- so heads up the Vanguards
To illustrate the point, she cited her 89 year old father-in-law, who is still defiantly living at home but is looked after by a team of 27 health and social care professionals – people who, because of the system in which they operate, aren’t able to communicate or coordinate properly with each other. “We have data that doesn’t cross populations, funding streams that don’t work and national policy that doesn’t encourage care around patients.”
Does the Vanguard programme actually narrow choice – and is there a hint that they are not entirely democratically accountable? Not so, she insists. All seven arm’s length bodies have sponsored the care model programme and the systems really are working together. And, any accusation of Vanguards being elitist was firmly dismissed. “There have to be leaders, people who go first – and we should be behind them,” she says.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE PRACTICE NEEDS TO LOOK LIKE?