Communications management involves four key processes: 1) communications planning which identifies information needs and delivery methods, 2) information distribution which disseminates information according to the plan, 3) performance reporting which provides updates on project progress and changes, and 4) managing stakeholders which resolves issues through meetings, emails and other engagement. The overall goal is to ensure timely and appropriate sharing of project information with all relevant parties.
The document discusses the key aspects of communication including the definition, process, types, levels and barriers of communication. It defines communication as the exchange of information, ideas, thoughts and feelings through various channels like speech, signals, writing and behavior. The types of communication covered are verbal, nonverbal, oral, and written. Verbal communication can be oral or written, while nonverbal involves body language, appearance and sounds. The levels of communication range from intrapersonal to interpersonal, small group, one-to-group, and mass communication. Barriers to effective communication include physical, perceptual, emotional, cultural, language, gender and interpersonal factors. The document also provides tips for overcoming barriers and tools for effective
The document summarizes a meeting about the SHARE project, which aimed to balance hydropower production and environmental needs through stakeholder participation. It discusses how the project identified stakeholders, assessed their needs, involved them through technical panels and case studies. It also describes software tools like VAPIDRO ASTE and SMART Mini-Idro developed to help with the multi-criteria assessment and support stakeholders. The project sought to improve sustainability of hydropower through transparency and an inclusive decision-making process.
This document contains agendas for meetings of the SHARE project, which aims to develop sustainable hydropower in Alpine rivers. The document outlines agendas for a project meeting and steering committee on May 23rd in Aosta, Italy, including discussions on project management, working groups, and pilot case studies. It also includes agendas for a final project meeting on May 24th with presentations on SHARE tools and a field trip on May 25th to visit pilot case studies in the Aosta Valley.
The document discusses integrating multi-criteria analysis (MCA) and the SHARE method in hydropower and river ecosystem management regulations in the Alps. It notes the complexity of balancing various stakeholder interests, legal requirements, and policy goals around water usage, hydropower development, and environmental protection. Integrating MCA can help objectively evaluate options, avoid disproportionate focus on any single issue, and foster shared understanding to guide consensus-based decisions.
The document discusses hydropower and the EU Water Framework Directive. It notes that hydropower currently provides over half of renewable electricity but will decrease to around 30% by 2020. A recent EU study found that hydropower production could be reduced by only 2-3% to meet the Water Framework Directive's environmental standards. The challenge is balancing renewable energy and environmental goals. Mitigation measures and refurbishment may allow increased hydropower while improving the environment.
The project MontanAqua studies integrated water management in a region of the Swiss Alps facing climate uncertainty. Preliminary results show the region has abundant water resources currently, but water demand may exceed supply by 2050. The Tseuzier storage lake plays a key role in managing water for multiple users, but its concession expires in 2037 requiring negotiation between stakeholders. The project explores scenarios for sustainable regional water management in the future as the system shifts from supply-focused to demand-based approaches.
Communications management involves four key processes: 1) communications planning which identifies information needs and delivery methods, 2) information distribution which disseminates information according to the plan, 3) performance reporting which provides updates on project progress and changes, and 4) managing stakeholders which resolves issues through meetings, emails and other engagement. The overall goal is to ensure timely and appropriate sharing of project information with all relevant parties.
The document discusses the key aspects of communication including the definition, process, types, levels and barriers of communication. It defines communication as the exchange of information, ideas, thoughts and feelings through various channels like speech, signals, writing and behavior. The types of communication covered are verbal, nonverbal, oral, and written. Verbal communication can be oral or written, while nonverbal involves body language, appearance and sounds. The levels of communication range from intrapersonal to interpersonal, small group, one-to-group, and mass communication. Barriers to effective communication include physical, perceptual, emotional, cultural, language, gender and interpersonal factors. The document also provides tips for overcoming barriers and tools for effective
The document summarizes a meeting about the SHARE project, which aimed to balance hydropower production and environmental needs through stakeholder participation. It discusses how the project identified stakeholders, assessed their needs, involved them through technical panels and case studies. It also describes software tools like VAPIDRO ASTE and SMART Mini-Idro developed to help with the multi-criteria assessment and support stakeholders. The project sought to improve sustainability of hydropower through transparency and an inclusive decision-making process.
This document contains agendas for meetings of the SHARE project, which aims to develop sustainable hydropower in Alpine rivers. The document outlines agendas for a project meeting and steering committee on May 23rd in Aosta, Italy, including discussions on project management, working groups, and pilot case studies. It also includes agendas for a final project meeting on May 24th with presentations on SHARE tools and a field trip on May 25th to visit pilot case studies in the Aosta Valley.
The document discusses integrating multi-criteria analysis (MCA) and the SHARE method in hydropower and river ecosystem management regulations in the Alps. It notes the complexity of balancing various stakeholder interests, legal requirements, and policy goals around water usage, hydropower development, and environmental protection. Integrating MCA can help objectively evaluate options, avoid disproportionate focus on any single issue, and foster shared understanding to guide consensus-based decisions.
The document discusses hydropower and the EU Water Framework Directive. It notes that hydropower currently provides over half of renewable electricity but will decrease to around 30% by 2020. A recent EU study found that hydropower production could be reduced by only 2-3% to meet the Water Framework Directive's environmental standards. The challenge is balancing renewable energy and environmental goals. Mitigation measures and refurbishment may allow increased hydropower while improving the environment.
The project MontanAqua studies integrated water management in a region of the Swiss Alps facing climate uncertainty. Preliminary results show the region has abundant water resources currently, but water demand may exceed supply by 2050. The Tseuzier storage lake plays a key role in managing water for multiple users, but its concession expires in 2037 requiring negotiation between stakeholders. The project explores scenarios for sustainable regional water management in the future as the system shifts from supply-focused to demand-based approaches.
The document discusses common guidelines for the use of small hydropower (SHP) in the Alpine region. It begins by providing context on the Alpine Convention framework, which aims to protect the Alps through international cooperation. It then presents examples of strategic planning approaches for hydropower development from various Alpine communities. Finally, it proposes a two-level procedure for assessing new SHP installations that involves both a regional strategic planning process and local project assessments. The goal is to balance renewable energy and environmental protection objectives.
This document summarizes a presentation on river restoration and sustainable hydropower given in Aosta, Italy. It discusses CIRF's goals of increasing river knowledge and promoting restoration. River restoration aims to restore natural functioning while supporting biodiversity, recreation, and other uses. Hydropower generation can harm ecological status through water abstraction and alterations. Multi-criteria analysis is presented as a tool to evaluate restoration impacts. Specific issues with existing and new hydropower plants are outlined, along with mitigation and compensation measures.
This document summarizes pilot case studies conducted as part of the SHARE MCA experimentation project. It describes 11 pilot case studies across several European countries that analyzed alternatives for existing and planned hydropower plants using multi-criteria analysis. The pilot cases examined different alternatives for managing factors like minimum instream flows, hydropeaking, sediment, and discharge on river reaches. They also considered competing uses, river recreation activities, landscape and risk indicators when building decision trees to rank alternatives for each hydropower plant location.
The document summarizes the River ecosystem requirements and SHARE MCA approach project final meeting. It discusses:
1. The Alps as an important biodiversity hotspot that has been modified by human impacts like hydropower generation.
2. SHARE's multi-criteria analysis approach to balancing river ecosystems and hydropower requirements by comparing different fields of interest to find a balance.
3. Examples of criteria used in the MCA like ecological status assessed through fish, macroinvertebrates and physical conditions, and case studies of 11 pilot projects in the Alpine region.
This document discusses the implementation of a multicriteria analysis (MCA) approach to determine optimal minimum instream flows while planning for mitigation measures. The MCA approach was used on a pilot case study river section in Slovenia to evaluate different residual flow levels and assess their impacts on ecology, hydropower potential, and other criteria. The MCA involved habitat modeling, expert analysis, and software to evaluate flows, simplify the decision tree, calculate hydropower potential, and analyze tradeoffs between criteria. The results showed that additional mitigation measures could allow for lower residual flows while achieving the same ecological outcomes. The approach provides a framework to balance ecological and energy objectives in a transparent and efficient manner.
The document summarizes an experimental project to determine optimal minimum instream flows in Aosta Valley rivers. The project involved monitoring the impacts of different flow levels on 77 monitoring stations across the river network. Results showed hydromorphological indicators were most responsive to hydropower pressures. While technical factors are considered, the role of public administrators in water protection is also essential for determining minimum vital flows.
This document summarizes the criteria for sustainable hydropower development in Tyrol, Austria. It outlines the background and goals, describes the development of criteria and their application in a GIS-based hydropower potential determination. The document discusses the process used to establish criteria, provides examples of criteria, and presents the results of assessing hydropower potential at the regional level based on the established criteria.
Session1.2 LP andrea mammoliti mochet_arpa valle d’aosta SHAREPROJECT
This document summarizes a meeting for the SHARE project, which developed a decision support system to evaluate sustainable hydropower production in alpine rivers while maintaining good ecosystem status. The system uses multi-criteria analysis to assess management alternatives for hydropower plants based on economic, energy production, environmental, and social criteria. It was tested on Italy's Chalamy river, comparing alternatives of no water release versus releasing 20%, 60%, or 100% of the minimum instream flow. The system aims to help local administrators balance hydropower demands with river protection by integrating stakeholder preferences into the assessment.
The document summarizes a conference on water and energy in the Alpine cooperation area. It discusses 6 EU-funded projects focusing on these issues, including AlpEnergy, Silmas, and SHARE. SHARE takes a strategic, transnational approach to improved water management and governance through tools like a decision support system. The conference emphasizes sustainability of the projects' results and tools. It also outlines the European context of water and energy directives and goals to inform the future Alpine Space Programme post-2013.
The document discusses common guidelines for the use of small hydropower (SHP) in the Alpine region. It begins by providing context on the Alpine Convention framework, which aims to protect the Alps through international cooperation. It then presents examples of strategic planning approaches for hydropower development from various Alpine communities. Finally, it proposes a two-level procedure for assessing new SHP installations that involves both a regional strategic planning process and local project assessments. The goal is to balance renewable energy and environmental protection objectives.
This document summarizes a presentation on river restoration and sustainable hydropower given in Aosta, Italy. It discusses CIRF's goals of increasing river knowledge and promoting restoration. River restoration aims to restore natural functioning while supporting biodiversity, recreation, and other uses. Hydropower generation can harm ecological status through water abstraction and alterations. Multi-criteria analysis is presented as a tool to evaluate restoration impacts. Specific issues with existing and new hydropower plants are outlined, along with mitigation and compensation measures.
This document summarizes pilot case studies conducted as part of the SHARE MCA experimentation project. It describes 11 pilot case studies across several European countries that analyzed alternatives for existing and planned hydropower plants using multi-criteria analysis. The pilot cases examined different alternatives for managing factors like minimum instream flows, hydropeaking, sediment, and discharge on river reaches. They also considered competing uses, river recreation activities, landscape and risk indicators when building decision trees to rank alternatives for each hydropower plant location.
The document summarizes the River ecosystem requirements and SHARE MCA approach project final meeting. It discusses:
1. The Alps as an important biodiversity hotspot that has been modified by human impacts like hydropower generation.
2. SHARE's multi-criteria analysis approach to balancing river ecosystems and hydropower requirements by comparing different fields of interest to find a balance.
3. Examples of criteria used in the MCA like ecological status assessed through fish, macroinvertebrates and physical conditions, and case studies of 11 pilot projects in the Alpine region.
This document discusses the implementation of a multicriteria analysis (MCA) approach to determine optimal minimum instream flows while planning for mitigation measures. The MCA approach was used on a pilot case study river section in Slovenia to evaluate different residual flow levels and assess their impacts on ecology, hydropower potential, and other criteria. The MCA involved habitat modeling, expert analysis, and software to evaluate flows, simplify the decision tree, calculate hydropower potential, and analyze tradeoffs between criteria. The results showed that additional mitigation measures could allow for lower residual flows while achieving the same ecological outcomes. The approach provides a framework to balance ecological and energy objectives in a transparent and efficient manner.
The document summarizes an experimental project to determine optimal minimum instream flows in Aosta Valley rivers. The project involved monitoring the impacts of different flow levels on 77 monitoring stations across the river network. Results showed hydromorphological indicators were most responsive to hydropower pressures. While technical factors are considered, the role of public administrators in water protection is also essential for determining minimum vital flows.
This document summarizes the criteria for sustainable hydropower development in Tyrol, Austria. It outlines the background and goals, describes the development of criteria and their application in a GIS-based hydropower potential determination. The document discusses the process used to establish criteria, provides examples of criteria, and presents the results of assessing hydropower potential at the regional level based on the established criteria.
Session1.2 LP andrea mammoliti mochet_arpa valle d’aosta SHAREPROJECT
This document summarizes a meeting for the SHARE project, which developed a decision support system to evaluate sustainable hydropower production in alpine rivers while maintaining good ecosystem status. The system uses multi-criteria analysis to assess management alternatives for hydropower plants based on economic, energy production, environmental, and social criteria. It was tested on Italy's Chalamy river, comparing alternatives of no water release versus releasing 20%, 60%, or 100% of the minimum instream flow. The system aims to help local administrators balance hydropower demands with river protection by integrating stakeholder preferences into the assessment.
The document summarizes a conference on water and energy in the Alpine cooperation area. It discusses 6 EU-funded projects focusing on these issues, including AlpEnergy, Silmas, and SHARE. SHARE takes a strategic, transnational approach to improved water management and governance through tools like a decision support system. The conference emphasizes sustainability of the projects' results and tools. It also outlines the European context of water and energy directives and goals to inform the future Alpine Space Programme post-2013.
Newsletter SPW Agriculture en province du Luxembourg du 12-06-24BenotGeorges3
Les informations et évènements agricoles en province du Luxembourg et en Wallonie susceptibles de vous intéresser et diffusés par le SPW Agriculture, Direction de la Recherche et du Développement, Service extérieur de Libramont.
Le fichier :
Les newsletters : https://agriculture.wallonie.be/home/recherche-developpement/acteurs-du-developpement-et-de-la-vulgarisation/les-services-exterieurs-de-la-direction-de-la-recherche-et-du-developpement/newsletters-des-services-exterieurs-de-la-vulgarisation/newsletters-du-se-de-libramont.html
Bonne lecture et bienvenue aux activités proposées.
#Agriculture #Wallonie #Newsletter #Recherche #Développement #Vulgarisation #Evènement #Information #Formation #Innovation #Législation #PAC #SPW #ServicepublicdeWallonie
Formation M2i - Onboarding réussi - les clés pour intégrer efficacement vos n...M2i Formation
Améliorez l'intégration de vos nouveaux collaborateurs grâce à notre formation flash sur l'onboarding. Découvrez des stratégies éprouvées et des outils pratiques pour transformer l'intégration en une expérience fluide et efficace, et faire de chaque nouvelle recrue un atout pour vos équipes.
Les points abordés lors de la formation :
- Les fondamentaux d'un onboarding réussi
- Les outils et stratégies pour un onboarding efficace
- L'engagement et la culture d'entreprise
- L'onboarding continu et l'amélioration continue
Formation offerte animée à distance avec notre expert Eric Collin
Cycle de Formation Théâtrale 2024 / 2025Billy DEYLORD
Pour la Saison 2024 / 2025, l'association « Le Bateau Ivre » propose un Cycle de formation théâtrale pour particuliers amateurs et professionnels des arts de la scène enfants, adolescents et adultes à l'Espace Saint-Jean de Melun (77). 108 heures de formation, d’octobre 2024 à juin 2025, à travers trois cours hebdomadaires (« Pierrot ou la science de la Scène », « Montage de spectacles », « Le Mime et son Répertoire ») et un stage annuel « Tournez dans un film de cinéma muet ».
Conseils pour Les Jeunes | Conseils de La Vie| Conseil de La JeunesseOscar Smith
Besoin des conseils pour les Jeunes ? Le document suivant est plein des conseils de la Vie ! C’est vraiment un document conseil de la jeunesse que tout jeune devrait consulter.
Voir version video:
➡https://youtu.be/7ED4uTW0x1I
Sur la chaine:👇
👉https://youtube.com/@kbgestiondeprojets
Aimeriez-vous donc…
-réussir quand on est jeune ?
-avoir de meilleurs conseils pour réussir jeune ?
- qu’on vous offre des conseils de la vie ?
Ce document est une ressource qui met en évidence deux obstacles qui empêchent les jeunes de mener une vie épanouie : l'inaction et le pessimisme.
1) Découvrez comment l'inaction, c'est-à-dire le fait de ne pas agir ou d'agir alors qu'on le devrait ou qu'on est censé le faire, est un obstacle à une vie épanouie ;
> Comment l'inaction affecte-t-elle l'avenir du jeune ? Que devraient plutôt faire les jeunes pour se racheter et récupérer ce qui leur appartient ? A découvrir dans le document ;
2) Le pessimisme, c'est douter de tout ! Les jeunes doutent que la génération plus âgée ne soit jamais orientée vers la bonne volonté. Les jeunes se sentent toujours mal à l'aise face à la ruse et la volonté politique de la génération plus âgée ! Cet état de doute extrême empêche les jeunes de découvrir les opportunités offertes par les politiques et les dispositifs en faveur de la jeunesse. Voulez-vous en savoir plus sur ces opportunités que la plupart des jeunes ne découvrent pas à cause de leur pessimisme ? Consultez cette ressource gratuite et profitez-en !
En rapport avec les " conseils pour les jeunes, " cette ressource peut aussi aider les internautes cherchant :
➡les conseils pratiques pour les jeunes
➡conseils pour réussir
➡jeune investisseur conseil
➡comment investir son argent quand on est jeune
➡conseils d'écriture jeunes auteurs
➡conseils pour les jeunes auteurs
➡comment aller vers les jeunes
➡conseil des jeunes citoyens
➡les conseils municipaux des jeunes
➡conseils municipaux des jeunes
➡conseil des jeunes en mairie
➡qui sont les jeunes
➡projet pour les jeunes
➡conseil des jeunes paris
➡infos pour les jeunes
➡conseils pour les jeunes
➡Quels sont les bienfaits de la jeunesse ?
➡Quels sont les 3 qualités de la jeunesse ?
➡Comment gérer les problèmes des adolescents ?
➡les conseils de jeunes
➡guide de conseils de jeunes
Conseils pour Les Jeunes | Conseils de La Vie| Conseil de La Jeunesse
2-Prise de décision – les étapes principales, l’exemple du choix d’un toasteur fr
1. Prise de décision – les étapes
principales, l’exemple du choix
d’un toasteur
11/29/2011
2. Pas principaux de la prise de
décision
1. Identification du problème et des acteurs impliqués
2. Identification des différentes alternatives à prendre en
considération
3. Identification des critères décrivant chaque alternative
4. Identifier la relation entre chaque critère et le problème
5. Identifier une échelle de priorité des critères
6. Classification des alternatives
7. Choix d’une alternative DECISION
3. 1. Le problème
• Les Simpsons sont une famille avec un
toasteur trop vieux, acheté il y a longtemps
pour moins de 10 € et qui grille les tranches
de pain irrégulièrement.
4. 1. Acteurs impliqués
• Tous les membres de la
famille SIMPSON sont des
acteurs – toutes les
contributions utiles pour le
choix sont admises.
6. 2. Identification d’alternatives
• La famille The Simpson décide de résumer les
considérations en 7 ALTERNATIVES correspondant
à 7 differents toasteur :
1. Boots 2-slice
2. Kenwood TT350
3. Marks & Spencer 2235
4. Morphy Richards
5. Coolstyle Philips HD4807
6. Kenwood TT825
7. Tefal Thick’n’Thin 8780
7. 3. Identification des critères
• Les critères sont les propriétés retenues par les
acteurs et utilisées afin d’évaluer chaque
alternative.
• Une discussion “placide” réduits les critères à 3:
1. prix
2. Option de rechauffage
3. Résultats des tests de produits
publiés
8. 4. Identifier la relation entre chaque
critère et les alternatives
• La famille détermine la valeur de chaque critère
qui correspond à chaque toasteur (alternatives):
Alternatives Prix Rechauffage Classement du test
Boot 2-slice 18 3
Kenwood TT350 27 √ 3
Marks & Spencer 2235 25 √ 3
Morphy Richards 22 2
Coolstyle Philips HD4807 22 √ 2
Kenwood TT825 30 2
Tefal Thick’n’Thin 8780 20 √ 5
• .. Et chaque valeur correpond à un dégré de
satisfaction (p.ex. meilleur prix, satisfaction +
élevée).
9. 5. Identification de l’échelle de
priorité des critères
• L’échelle de priorités retenues par la famille :
1
2
3
Rechauffage Classement Prix
10. 6. Classification des alternatives
• .. Finalement un tableau est établi:
Coolstyle Philips HD4807 1
Morphy Richards 2
Boot 2-slice 3
Marks & Spencer 2235 4
Kenwood TT350 5
Tefal Thick’n’Thin 8780 6
Kenwood TT825 7
12. Résumé des pas de la prise de
décisions
• Après l’identification du problème et des acteurs
impliqués (1.) des différentes alternatives (2.) les
pas principaux se laissent résumés
3. Choix des critères
p.ex. Prix, ..
4. Relation entre critèries et problèm e
p.ex. Prix du toasteur
5. Priorités
De la + importante à la moins importante
6. Classification des alternatives
7. Choix
p.ex Coolstyle Philips HD4807