3. What I am going to talk about
1. Digital
2. Social & historical context
3. Implications for leadership (and organisations)
Think about
4.
5. What is the most important aspect of creating and
developing the Digital DNA of your organisation;
is it knowledge of the customer experience path or is it
stakeholder relationship management?
or perhaps you think that it is the technical coding
capabilities of the organisation or even knowledge of M2M
solutions.
Digital Leaders
Said Business School July 2015
‘Digital DNA’
6. Digital: definition
1. (Of signals or data) expressed as series of the digits 0
and 1, typically represented by values of a physical
quantity such as voltage or magnetic polarization.
Often contrasted with analogue.
2. Relating to, using, or storing data or information in the
form of digital signals: digital TV a digital recording
3. Involving or relating to the use of computer
technology: the digital revolution
Source: Oxford Dictionaries
7. Digital: definition
“Digital is not a technology,
it’s the speed at which
things happen”
“Digital isn’t software, it’s mindset”
10. Clients often start with the question: what is digital? And it
always depends on who is asking.
A better question is: what are the consequences of digital?
What do we have to do differently?
What do you understand
by ‘digital’?
Richard Gold, Associate Director at Transform
11. Management Agenda 2015
61% of respondents agreed that “digital technologies
and social media are changing the way I do things in
my organisation”
66% of respondents agreed that “my organisation
needs to recruit or develop new leadership capabilities
to take advantage of digital technologies”
Management Agenda 2015
Authors: Dan Lucy, Meysam Poorkavoos and Julia Wellbelove
12. Technology is changing five times
faster than management
Mark Stevenson, Meaning 2014
McKinsey & Company
13. “Technology is accelerating five times
faster than management”
Mark Stevenson, Meaning 2014
McKinsey & Company
17. Societal Trends
Demographic
Expertise
Attention
Democratic
From Emmanuel Gobillot’s
Leadershift: Reinventing Leadership for the Age of Mass Collaboration
18. Definition: delusion
An idiosyncratic belief or
impression maintained
despite being contradicted
by reality or rational
argument, typically as a
symptom of mental disorder
Source: Oxford Dictionaries
19. Digitally Deluded Leaders: Two Extremes
“All Hail Digital!”
Pace (Fast)
Omni-channel
Customer / User at all costs
Transformation programmes
Flat / flexible structures
Mixed teams
Decision making (risk taking)
Digital mindset
“Nothing’s changed, really”
Same thing / way but faster
Same channels
Serve our needs first
Change programmes
Hierarchical / rigid structures
Silos
Decision making (risk
adverse)
Analogue mindset
20. Shifts required
Clarity to Simplicity
Plans to Narratives
Roles to Tasks
Money to Love
The Elvis Fallacy
From Emmanuel Gobillot’s
Leadershift: Reinventing Leadership for the Age of Mass Collaboration
21. Polarities
Swift and mindful
Individual and community
Top-down and grassroots
Details and big picture
Flexible and steady
Pulley & Sessa (2002)
22. When hiring a CDO… we’ve found it’s the ability to lead
transformation across an organization that is the true
indicator of likely success in the role, and that requires a
combination of hard and soft skills. Hard skills include the
ability to articulate a strategic vision, the means to take on
problems by identifying root causes across functions and
making the tough decisions necessary to resolve them,
experience in “pure play” digital and larger company
transformations (typically in the consumer and technology
sectors), and the managerial ability to lead and see
programs through to fruition.
Transformer in chief: The new chief digital officer
McKinsey & Co, September 2015
Implications for leaders and leadership
23. The importance of soft skills should not be understated:
some CDOs estimate they spend 80 percent of their time
building relationships. In our experience, successful CDOs
have the patience to navigate the complex organizational
structures of large businesses; additionally, they collaborate
to get buy-in across functions and are able to diplomatically
challenge the status quo and solidify relationships with a
broad group of people.
Transformer in chief: The new chief digital officer
McKinsey & Co, September 2015
Crucuially
25. Questions that matter
What does digital mean to you, individually, collectively and
organisationally?
What is the question you are answering?
What do you want to be the Same & Different?
How are you going to answer it, with whom?
What behaviours, skills & competencies does your organisation
require more (or less) of?
How do will you attend to the gap (technology & social
processes)?
What is an appropriate pace?
How will you maintain and attend to trust?
27. www.roffeypark.com
STEVE HEARSUM
Development Consultant
steve.hearsum@roffeypark.com
T : +44 (0)1293 854008
M: +44 (0)7917 130409
@stevehearsum
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/stevehearsum
http://www.linkedin.com/company/roffey-park-institute
MELISSA GREEN
Business Development Manager
melissa.green@roffeypark.com
T : +44 (0)1293 854055
M: +44 (0)7801 616281
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/melissa-green/6/74a/494
http://www.linkedin.com/company/roffey-park-institute
Notes de l'éditeur
Aaron Dignan: Digital Isn't Software, It's a Mindset
User centred
Collaborative
Innovative
Agile
QUESTIONS?
@auchard – reuters tech correspondent
@michellenichols
Reuters correspondent at the United Nations in New York (far from home in Australia).
Alistair Smout
@asmo17 Journo at Reuters, writing on markets, politics, and sometimes funk.
Annya Schneider
@annya_do
Communications at Thomson Reuters Foundation || @TR_Foundation
There are four major societal trends that are forever transforming the way we live. As they continue to grow we face a stark choice – change the way we lead or become irrelevant.
Demographic trend = multiple generations working alongside each other, each with demands and experiences that the others cannot comprehend.
Expertise trend = expertise is now found as much outside as inside the organization.
Attention trend = organizations have to fight harder than ever to capture the attention of employees and customers as information and interaction sources lay claim to limited time.
Democratic trend = likelihood of leaders having direct control (rather than dotted lines or no lines at all) over their resources is remote.
Whilst a leader’s role has always been and will remain the creation of engagement, alignment, accountability and commitment to the organizational cause, in this new landscape the tools they use will need to change. Where once they relied on clarity, plans, roles and money to achieve these aims, they will need to find new tools.
Clarity is no longer feasible as a source of engagement. It is either impossible to provide or requires a one-sided view of the world (the leader’s) to be constructed. This will not do for social engagement. Simplicity, on the other hand, by providing simplification (i.e. simpler ways of operating) and coherence (i.e. a purpose for the effort) will play the role clarity once had.
QUESTIONS?
All Hail Digital
Case Study - BOL
Case Study – Financial Services
Case Study – Civil Service Twitter
Nothing Changes
Morrisons – home deliveries (Jan 2014 first home deliveries
newspapers
HRP
Simplicity, on the other hand, by providing simplification (i.e. simpler ways of operating) and coherence (i.e. a purpose for the effort) will play the role clarity once had.
Plans are only worth drafting if they are likely to be followed. When conversations are constantly helping the community to make sense of its environment, plans play no part in helping alignment. It is a narrative that provides the common language and story that ensures a community is aligned.
By defining accountabilities, roles are limiting to a certain set of circumstances. In an ever-changing environment, success is defined by having a community that is able to do whatever it takes to achieve an outcome, irrespective of whether an individual has been given a specific role or not. Our focus needs to change from roles to tasks that need to be fulfilled for the narrative to stay alive.
Finally, whilst money might secure involvement it will never secure commitment. It is contributing to the community and helping it grow (i.e. love) that keeps people committed to the efforts of the community. Understanding what people love and helping them find an outlet for that love is what will make leaders successful.
Pulley & Sessa (2002) argue that “technology is intensifying a number of paradoxes that are stretching leader’s capacities”, and from their research offer five that stand out:
Swift and mindful – the increase in speed of everything that happens in increasingly connected organisations compromises the quality of decision making, eroding the benefit of the time efficiencies.
Individual and community – more digital interaction reduces human contact and thus social cohesion and increases isolation.
Top-down and grassroots – digital places huge pressure on organisations that are hierarchically structured. The more rigid the design, the greater the tendency and ease with which voices can be heard from any level in the organisation. That means the voices from below are audible, and ignored at your peril. The relationship is fundamentally changed, whether you intended that to be or not.
Details and big picture – ever more data may be useful, but it eats time. How to get the balance right?
Flexible and steady – change in organisations was arguably never linear. Digital technology amplifies that pattern. As someone in a digital agency said to an OD Practitioner in a story I heard recently: “We have to be liquid because flexible is too rigid”.
“Whilst a leader’s role has always been and will remain the creation of engagement, alignment, accountability and commitment to the organizational cause, in this new landscape the tools they use will need to change.
Where once they relied on clarity, plans, roles and money to achieve these aims, they will need to find new tools.”
From Emmanuel Gobillot’s Leadershift: Reinventing Leadership for the Age of Mass Collaboration