Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Skills building training day 3 force field and conflicts
1. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse edilmektedir
IMPROVED STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
CAPACITY PROJECT
Change Management – Session 3
Jocelyne Rasé
October 2013
2. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Day Three
Anticipating and coping with resistance
• Force field theory – tug of war between restraining & driving forces
• The social positions people adapt when faced with organisational change:
Champions, citizens & cynics of change.
• Identify and map the resources available to you: Mavens, Connectors,
Salesmen
How do you cope with conflicting situations?
• The Thomas Killman conflict resolution model
• Do you want to be right or to have a relationship?
• Avoiding Dual Thinking
Group project - blockers & enablers
3. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Organisational Change
Shaping a Vision (What is expected)
• Making sure that the desired outcome of change is clear, legitimate, and
widely understood and shared
• SM Facilitators need to tell what change looks like
• Communicate the change of mindset necessary – to train people, run
workshops, discussion groups, formally & informally with key stakeholders
to make the vision alive and cascade it down
Mobilizing Commitment (Who else could be involved)
• Making sure that there is a commitment from a strong network to make the
change work
• SM Facilitators need to influence and find allies
• Get management’s attention in each ministry – who else an you involve in
the process?
4. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Organisational Change
Monitoring Progress (How we are measuring getting better)
• Making sure that progress is real, that benchmarks are set and realized
• Making sure that Key Performance Indicators KPI are established to ensure
progress
• SM Facilitators need to keep a record ongoing improvement,
• Report progress to SMC project staff and MoD,
• Meet with each other to benefit from their experience
Making It Last (How we are going to keep the momentum)
• Making sure that appropriate plans are made and followed
• SM Facilitators need to make sure that that learning in one part of the
institution is shared throughout the whole organisation
5. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Organisational Change
6. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Force Field Analysis - Lewin's Model
Restraining forces:
• Loss of status
• Fear of incompetence
• Complacency – “it’s not
that bad…”
• Established work methods
• Tradition
• Culture
Driving forces:
• Incentives
• New enthusiastic people
• Strategic Management project
Managerial pressure
• International pressure
• Ambition
• Sense of purpose
7. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Force Field Analysis
• Describe current state
• Describe a problem
• Identify the situation where the organization will end
up if no corrective action is taken
• Describe a desired state
• Brainstorm the positive and negative forces
• Review and clarify each force or factor
– What is behind each factor?
– What works to balance the situation?
8. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Exercise
• Identify a significant change you would like to make
• Describe state – A –
• Describe the problem you have
• Identify the situation where you will end if no corrective action is taken
(worst scenario)
• Describe the desired state – B – what you want to achieve
• Brainstorm the positive and negative forces
• Review and clarify each force or factor
– What is behind each factor?
– What is necessary to support the change?
9. 50%
At the core of change is a dilemma
PARALYSIS
of
ANALYSIS
Doing Nothing – Status Quo
Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
50%
55%
60%
70%
80%
DUAL THINKING: either/or, black/white, good/bad
Which voice are you going to listen to?
9
10. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Blocking factors – restraining forces
11. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Blocking factors – restraining forces
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Lack of vision
Lack of purpose
Lack of understanding
Lack of motivation
Lack of courage
Lack of encouragement
Lack of incentives
Circumstances
Political climate
Tradition
The old tapes in your head
Specific negative people “It can’t be done”
Other priorities (family, sickness, emergencies, etc)
Misconceptions - beliefs
Prejudice
Preconceived ideas
Fear, learned helplessness
Etc….
12. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Enabling factors – driving forces
13. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Enabling factors – driving forces
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Positive, encouraging people “It is possible”
Clarity of vision and of purpose
Sponsors, mentors, allies
MoD & MoF, The court of Auditors & The Parliament
SDUs
TAT - Technical Assistance Team – External experts – Marko,
Kathryn, Eduardo and short term experts (TWT)
Resources available
your past experience
the experience of other people
Practice
Network
Reading – blogs, information
14. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Three level model
• Unfreezing - find a method to make it possible for people to let go of
an old patterns that were counterproductive in some way
• Stepping out of the comfort zone - STOP the old way
• Change - change in thoughts, feeling, behavior, that is in some way
more liberating or more productive – training, support, coaching,
mentoring to adopt a mindset of Continuous Improvement
• Entering the stretch zone – new habits
• Refreezing - establishing the change as a new habit, so that it now
becomes the "standard operating procedure”. Share best practice
with others, monitor ongoing progress.
• Develop long term high performance and resilience
• Without proper refreezing, it is easy to backslide into the old ways
15. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Resistance to Change
Def: ”behavior which is intended to protect an individual from the effects of real or imagined
change”
Resistance might come from…
•
Frustration and anxiety: resisting a potential loss of status, pay, comfort, or power that
came from expertise under the old system
•
Fear of the unknown future and about one’s ability to adapt to it
•
Resentment in disgruntled employees due to a perceived unfairness of the change.
This can be strong enough to lead to sabotage.
•
Seeing the change as a violation of agreement management has with employees:
loss of mutual trust, lack of loyalty, no keeping commitment
•
Competing commitment that is incompatible with the desired change
16. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Tap into your network
17. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Optimise Your Network
Decision
Makers
Mavens
Sales People
Know everything
Can sell anything
Connectors
Know everybody
18. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Exercise – Mapping your environment
Decision
Makers
Mavens
Connectors
Sales People
Know everything
Know everybody
Can sell anything
19. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
5 topics identified
1. How to get engagement and support from the under secretary of
your institution? What actions would take? How would you do it?
2. How to make more coherent the various SM documents. Which
ones? and how?
3. Choose 3 strategic areas relevant to your institutions and define the
main priorities and the KPIs – Key Performance Indicators - for each
of them
4. What measures would you take to improve the SM capacity in your
institution
5. How would you ensure that there are more incentives to comply with
the SM measures?
20. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Force Field Analysis
• Describe current state
• Describe a problem
• Identify the situation where the organization will end
up if no corrective action is taken
• Describe a desired state
• Brainstorm the positive and negative forces
• Review and clarify each force or factor
– What is behind each factor?
– What works to balance the situation?
21. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Analysis Exercise – in sub groups – flip charts
What are the causes behind the problem?
What – Who are your blocking factors?
What – Who are your enabling factors?
22. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Anticipate Resistance
23. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Skill - Will
Grumpy
Expert
Skill
SM Facilitator
OK if I do
OK if I don’t
Can’t Do
Won’t Do
Eager Novice
Will
24. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
When facing resistance – questions to ask yourself…
Awareness
Desire
Knowledge
Ability
Reinforcement
Do they know that they need to change?
Do they want to change? What is in it for them?
What are the consequences for them of not changing?
Do they have the required knowledge? How can they acquire tit?
Are they able to apply skills and knowledge? Is coaching/support
required?
What happens when they do (or do not) display required
behaviour/way of working?
Is there positive reinforcement when they do?
Are there negative consequences when they do not?
25
25. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Attitude is everything
26. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Attitude is everything
27. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
What is your basic attitude?
Situation
Pessimist
Optimist
Principle
"It is temporary."
"It will last for a long
time; Spring is here
to stay.”
Permanence
“I am such a failure, I
never win anything”
“Today was not my day...
I will do better tomorrow"
Pervasiveness
"I caused it;
it’s my fault”
“Circumstances
caused it.”
Personalisation
Good event
Ex: It is sunny
Bad event
Ex: I lost the
tennis game
Negative outcome
Ex: I did not get the
promotion
15 November 2013
30
30
28. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Social Roles - Champions
• People who actively try to
participate as well as
influence the larger sphere, e.g.
other people’s opinions, larger
organizational systems, etc.
• They are ready to act as
strategic agents.
Mantere (2003)
29. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Social Roles - Citizens
• Acting as a part of the
strategy process, but not
active on influencing the
organization in strategic
issues transcending her
own immediate working
sphere
Mantere (2003)
30. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Social Roles - Cynics
• The cynic is a person who
has given up on the very
notion of the change,
regards it with occasional
scorn, occasional disinterest.
• The cynics can be positive
in their identification with the
institution, but do not feel
anything useful could
come out of organisational
strategy
Mantere (2003)
31. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
In order to influence people to change, you need to build trust
Emotions - Feelings
Opinions - Beliefs
Facts - Information
Ritual - Cliché
Time
Risk
Trust
Rapport
32. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Change is forced upon someone…
Future
State
Acceptance
Optimism/Relief
Shock
Testing
Denial
Current
State
Anger
Bargaining
Adapting
TIME
35
33. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Do you want to BE RIGHT
or to have a relationship?
34. Human dilemma
Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Being loyal to
yourself
Being loyal
to Others
AND
Either
Or
DUAL THINKING – either /or
leads to confusion, resentment,
passive aggressive behavior, anger
37
35. Thomas Killmann Model of Conflict Resolution
Low Assertiveness – loyalty to myself
High
Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Competition
Win – Lose
Collaboration
Win – Win
I am right
We can both be satisfied
FIGHT
ASSERTIVENESS
Compromise
Both of us are dissatisfied
No Win - No Lose
Avoidance
Lose – Lose
Accommodation
Lose – Win
I don’t know
I am wrong
PARALYSIS
FLIGHT
Low
Cooperation - loyalty to others
High
36. Thomas Kilmann model
Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Collaboration
WIN - LOSE
I win – We are going to the
football game
WIN - WIN
We go to the football game together
one day, next day to ballet
Compromise
Assertiveness
High
Competition
NO WIN – NO LOSE
We are going to see a movie we don’t like
…at least the other did not win
Avoidance
Low
LOSE – LOSE
We don’t do anything together
Low
Cooperation
Accommodation
YOU WIN – I LOSE
You win, I am giving up ballet
High
37. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Model
COMPETING: I WIN – YOU LOSE
• Is assertive and uncooperative, a power-oriented mode.
• When competing, an individual pursues his or her own concerns at
the other person’s expense, using whatever power seems appropriate
to win his or her position.
Appropriate when
• Standing up for your rights
• Defending a position you believe is correct
• Enforcing rules, legal issues, ethical matters, human rights, etc
• Safety – not negotiable
• Asserting one’s authority (ex: with your children)
38. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Model
ACCOMMODATING: YOU WIN – I LOSE
• Is unassertive and cooperative.
• The individual neglects his or her own concerns to satisfy the
concerns of the other person; there is an element of self-sacrifice in
this mode.
Appropriate when
• Selfless generosity or charity
• Obeying another person’s order (ex: following a fireman’s instructions)
• Yielding to another’s point of view for a higher purpose
• Picking battles that matter
• Allowing the other to save face on an issue that matters to him
(ex: going through the door first)
39. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Model
AVOIDING: I LOSE – YOU LOSE
• Is unassertive and uncooperative.
• The individual does not immediately pursue his or her own concerns
or those of the other person. He or she does not address the conflict.
Appropriate when
• Diplomatically sidestepping an issue (ex: not discussing politics or religion)
• Postponing an issue until a better time (ex: taking time to cool off)
• Withdrawing from a threatening situation (ex on the parkway)
40. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Model
COMPROMISING: NO WIN – NO LOSE
• Is intermediate in both assertiveness and cooperativeness.
• The objective is to find an expedient, mutually acceptable solution that
partially satisfies both parties.
Appropriate when
• Bargaining prices - splitting the difference
• Exchanging concessions (ex: I will give you this if you give me that …)
• Seeking a quick middle - ground position (let’s agree to disagree and not argue about that)
You have to know what you are willing to give in
and what your bottom line is – what you are not willing to negotiate
41. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Model
COLLABORATING: WIN – WIN
• Is both assertive and cooperative.
• Attempts to work with the other person to find a solution that fully
satisfies the concerns of both. It involves digging into an issue to
identify the underlying concerns of the two individuals and to find an
alternative that meets both sets of concerns.
Appropriate when
• Learning from each other’s insights
• Sharing resources
• Finding a creative solution to an interpersonal problem
• Negotiating how to work together – willingness on both sides
• Recognition of each point of view as valid and legitimate
42. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
DUAL THINKING
FIGHT or FLIGHT?
Winner or Loser?
43. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Dual Thinking
either/or – good/bad – black/white
44. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
WIN and WIN
45. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
Exercise in sub groups
• How do you apply those principles of TKI in your
Ministry with the people you meet
• When do you use each mode of conflict resolution?
• Give examples
• How can you handle situations better in the future?
46. Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye
Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse
edilmektedir
See you tomorrow…