Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation and Grading System: Conceptual Overview and Ground Realities presented in National Seminar at Dayalbagh Educational Institute (DEI) Deemed University, Agra (UP)
4. What are various kinds of Evaluation ?
Self-referenced Evaluation
A process to progress for future
Criterion-referenced Evaluation
Criterion set by external agency
Norm-referenced Evaluation
Referencing peer-groups
5. SRE NRE
E 4 CCE
CRE
In the field of education, it can be achieved
through SYSTEMIC REFORMS
7. Why do we need CCEG ?
Three Domains of
Learning
8.
9. Why do we need CCEG ?
Envisaging Validity and
Reliability of Evaluation
10.
11. Why do we need CCEG?
Anxiety, Stress and
Opportunity Factor
12. Objectives: What CBSE says
• To help develop cognitive, psychomotor and affective skills.
• To lay emphasis on thought process and de-emphasise
memorization.
• To make evaluation an integral part of teaching-learning process.
• To use evaluation for improvement of students’ achievement and
teaching – learning strategies on the basis of regular diagnosis
followed by remedial instruction.
• To use evaluation as a quality control device to maintain desired
standard of performance.
• To determine social utility, desirability or effectiveness of a
programme and take appropriate decisions about the learner, the
process of learning and the learning environment.
• To make the process of teaching and learning a learner-centered
activity.
13. SUGGESTIVE SCHEME OF CCEG
Areas of Assessment
Objectives/Criterion
Limited
resources !
Techniques & Tools
Recording of Assessment
R
Reporting of Assessment
21. Co-scholastic Areas
Co-scholastic Areas
CCA
Natural Sciences SPQ
Social Sciences
Interests, Attitude
Physical & Health Education,
and Values
Work Experience
23. Term I and Term II Weightage
Term I:
FA1 (10%) +FA2 (10%) +SA1 (20%) = 40%
Term II:
FA3 (10%) +FA4 (10%) +SA2 (40%) = 60%
24. Ground Reality:
Points to Ponder
We segregate different
components of learning
for assessment and
evaluation
Is it Comprehensive
Evaluation?
25. Ground Reality:
Points to Ponder
We break up evaluation
into FA1, FA2, SA1, SA2
Is it Continuous
Evaluation?
26. Ground Reality:
Points to Ponder
We emphasize upon
creating records for FA
Is this Formative
Assessment?
27. Ground Reality:
Points to Ponder
It is only teachers who are
constantly developing
tools for CCE
Is it Learner-centered
approach?
28. Ground Reality:
Points to Ponder
We are structuring time
frame for FA
Are we evaluating the
learner or system-
efficiency?
29. What do you feel?
Has Evaluation become an
integrated part of Teaching
& learning after CCE ?
Has introduction
of CCE really
changed anything
in the process of
Evaluation?
30. A Question to All of Us
Are we still not Teacher-
centered, System-centered,
Record-centered and Product-
centered?
Are we ready to change
ourselves?