This session was for faculty of the College of Education to discuss how to "Add Depth to Discussion" in an online environment, ie. Blackboard, wikis, blogs, Google Docs. All Links are live and active as of Sept. 15, 2011. Please note: The formatting of the reference page didn't convert well.

1. Adding Depth to Discussion IDEAS Room Faculty Discussion Session Wendy Grojean September 2011

2. Blackboard Discussion Tools Blog Journal Entries-Group & Individual Wikis Discussion Board

3. Other tools… Tumblr Blogger Edublogs GoogleDocs Wikis-Google Sites & Wikispaces What have you used?

4. Tools & Pedagogy Tools are not effective without good pedagogy. Eight Tips for Facilitating Effective Online Discussion Forums

5. Examples of Expectations 1.The Do's and Don'ts of Online Student Communication 2. The Core Rules of Netiquette-Albion.com 3. Netiquette Guidelines-Paradigm Publishing 4. What expectations do you communicate with students?

7. McKenzie “Questioning Tool Kit”

8. Jamie Mckenzie questioning research article: "Questioning as Technology”

9. New Blooms Taxonomy

10. “Bloom’s Taxonomy Blooms Digitally”

12. Rubric Resources Sample Rubric –University of Pittsburgh Tips and Rubrics-Middle Tennessee State University Rubric example-University of Wisconsin-Stout What type/style of rubrics work for you?

13. References Christopher, M., Thomas, J., & Tallent-Runnels, M. (2004, Spring). Raising the bar: Encouraging high level thinking in online discussion forums. Roeper Review, 26 (3), 166-171. Retrieved from Teacher Reference Center database. (12902668) Discussion board tips and pedagogy [Information Sheet]. (n.d.). Retrieved September 7, 2011, from Middle Tennessee State University website:http://frank.mtsu.edu/~‌ webctsup/f‌aculty/‌manual/W‌ ebCTDiscussionBoard_Tips-Pedagogy.pdf Frey, B. (n.d.). Rubric for asynchronous discussion participation [Rubric]. Retrieved September 9, 2011, from http://www.udel.edu/janet/MARC2006/rubric.html Im, Y., & Lee, O. (2003-2004, Winter). Pedagogical implications of online discussion for pre-service teacher training. Journal of Research Technology in Education, 36(2), 155-170.Retrieved from Teacher Reference Center database. (13036613) McKenzie, J. (1997, November/December). A questioning toolkit. From Now On: The Educational Technology Journal, 7(3). Retrieved from: http://fno.org/nov97/toolkit.html

14. References (cont’d) McKenzie, J. (2003, April). Questioning as technology. From Now On: The Educational Technology Journal. Retrieved from http://questioning.org/qtech.html Nielsen, L. E. (2010). Discussion rubric for online class [Rubric]. Retrieved September 9, 2011, from University of Wisconsin-Stout website: http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/profdev/rubrics/discussionrubric.html Owens, R. (2009, July 23). Eight tips for facilitating effective online discussion forums. Faculty Focus. Retrieved from http://www.facultyfocus.com/a‌rticles/ asynchronous-learning-and-trends/e‌ight-tips-for-facilitating-effective-online- discussion-forums/ Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy [Guide]. (n.d.). Retrieved September 7, 2011, from Wayne County Schools website: http://www.techlearning.com/article/Blooms-Taxonomy-Blooms-Digitally/44988 Ross, S. (2011). The core rules of netiquette [Guidelines]. Retrieved September 10, 2011, from Albion website: http://www.albion.com/netiquette/corerules.html

15. References (cont’d) Rutkosky, N., & Seguin, D. (n.d.). Following netiquette guidelines [Guidelines]. Retrieved September 7, 2011, from Paradigm Publishing website: http://www.emcp.com/college_resource_centers/listonline.php?GroupID=6168 Tucker, C. The do’s and don’ts of online student communication [Guidelines]. Retrieved September 8, 2011, from Collaborize Classroom website: http://www.wecollaborize.com//pdf/student-communication-online.pdf