2. The Project
CCAP forms networks of mitigation action practitioners in Latin America and Asia,
concentrating on mid-income developing countries
Mitigation Action Implementation Network (MAIN)
One of the Goals: Support for the International Partnership on Mitigation and MRV
with insights from the ground
3. The Participants
• Latin America: started in March 2011
Argentina, Caribbean, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica ,
Panama, Peru
• Asia: Likely participants include China, India, Indonesia,
Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore,
Thailand, and Vietnam, as well as Pacific Island nations
such as Maldives, Marshall Islands, Tuvalu and
Micronesia.
6. *Key Design Features of NAMAs
- More specific than overall reduction target or pledge
for an entire country (some confusion on this point)
- More than project-by-project approach of CDM- More than project-by-project approach of CDM
- No final definition yet
- Selected and designed by the respective host
government
- Goal: Put climate on the national policy agenda
7. The Private Sector and the
Implementation of NAMAs
• Involve it from the very beginning of design of NAMAs
• Developing countries can clearly learn from mitigation actions
implemented already elsewhere that were successful in
mobilising the private sector (for example, renewables)
• Outside finance (NAMA support) can help to get green• Outside finance (NAMA support) can help to get green
business models running and showcase their advantages (loan
programs for efficiency - started with money from Annex-1 -
become attractive for local banks in short-time)
• International support can lower risk for investors and attract
attention of local players
8. *What are Good Practices to Develop and
Implement NAMAs?
- The abbreviation NAMAs is confusing to of those not
involved in UNFCCC negotiations on a daily basis
- We should demistify this term and make clear that it is
simply about implementing good nationallysimply about implementing good nationally
appropriate mitigation actions
- As in developed countries, it seems best if LCDS and
NAMA development is coordinated in an inter-
ministerial committee which has the backing of the
president or the head of government.
9. *What are Good Practices to Develop and
Implement NAMAs?
Copy and paste the best ideas from
your succesful neighbours and peersyour succesful neighbours and peers
10. Potential NAMAs being Developed
• Mexico cement “NAMA” (potential)
– Increase use of blended cement to reduce need for energy-intensive clinker (creating
demand for blended cement through regulations, etc.)
– Increase use of alternative fuels (MSW, tires, etc.)
– Targets in these areas reduce sector emissions by 9% (2020) and 15% (2030) below–
BAU
• Argentina freight rail “NAMA” (potential)
– Large-scale, $1.5 bn railway renovation project (GHG, co-benefits)
– Modal switch for freight transport (2% 20% of agriculture by rail)
– Although already largely funded, incremental components could be funded through
NAMA framework and result in further GHG reductions
– Working on MRV methodology and how to make attractive to donors
11. Potential NAMAs
Being Developed (cont’d)
• Other Potential “NAMAs”
– In Peru: Promoting energy-efficient lighting in the residential and commercial sectors by
removing barriers to the use of efficient lighting technologies (NAMA financing could go
toward public education or EE pilot project)
– In Chile: Renewable energy; energy efficiency in transportation, buildings/housing,
mining operations
– In Colombia: Smart growth, transport-oriented development opportunities; energy– In Colombia: Smart growth, transport-oriented development opportunities; energy
efficiency in housing; renewable energy
12. WANTED
For another project we are looking for sucess stories
• mitigation projects in developing countries
• Supported with finance from Europe
• already visibles results• already visibles results
- Low carbon technologies applied
- Programs or laws already adopted
- Ambitious national strategies