SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  11
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Neuromodulation Division




Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of the
Occipital Nerves for Chronic Migraine

Clinical Study Results
Clinical Study Design
        Patient
        Enrolled

                                               Group A: Active

           PNS
         Implanted
                               2:1 Ratio
     Randomize and
     Device Activation                     Group B: Control (Blind)




    80- to 90-day roll in       4-week visit                     12-week visit    24-week visit   52-week visit



   The integrity of the Control (or blind) group was maintained as:

   1/ Both patients in the Control group, and the study investigator were blinded, so nobody knew
   who was active or control
   2/ All Control patients were given programmers that appeared to be functioning, but did not
   communicate with the IPG (for the first 12 weeks).
   3/ Patients in the control group were told that a range of different settings were being
   tested which was not indicative of whether they were in the control or active group.
Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
Clinical Study Design
  Study Inclusion Criteria                                       Study Exclusion Criteria
      Diagnosed with chronic migraine                                Patients identified as having Medication
                                                                     Overuse Headache (MOH) - per
      headache days/month                                            assessment by study investigator
      Has tried at least 2 migraine-specific                         Patients who within 8 weeks prior to initial
      acute medications and at least 2                               baseline have started new medications or
      different classes of prophylactic                              therapy to treat headache pain
      medications and found to be refractory
                                                                     Patients who had tried Botox who had tried
      VAS score of 6 cm (or greater)                                 6 months prior to
      on a 10-cm line                                                initial baseline
      Headache pain is posterior head pain or                        Patients who have undergone a destructive
      pain originating in the cervical region                        procedure affecting
                                                                     C2/C3/occipital distribution
                                                                     Cervical abnormality that does
                                                                     not allow for placement of the percutaneous
                                                                     lead


     The above inclusion/ exclusion criteria were used in the clinical research to
                 define the study population for chronic migraine.


Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
Baseline Patient Demographics

                                                                        Control Group    Active Group
                                                                           (N=52)          (N=105)

                                                 Mean (+std)             44,6 (+ 10,3)   45,0 (+ 11,3)
  Age
                                                    Range                   23 65           18 72

                                                     Male                 9 (17,3%)      24 (22,9%)
  Gender
                                                    Female                43 (82,7%)     81 (77,1%)

                                                 Mean (+std)             24,6 + 13,3     21,9 + 14,9
  Duration of Headache (yrs)
                                                    Range                   2,4 54         1,3 66

  Baseline Number of Headache
  Days
                                                 Mean (+std)             72,3 (+ 23,5)   80,7 (+ 18,2)
  (out of 90 From MIDAS
  Questionnaire)


    Study participants in the active and control groups were similar at baseline

Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
Results: Primary Endpoint
50% Reduction in Pain on VAS
Continuous Proportion Responder Analysis Based on Mean Daily Average Pain Intensity
VAS Measurements With No Increase in Average Headache Frequency or Duration

 Primary Endpoint:
   The primary endpoint in the study was a statistical reference point imposed by
 the FDA:
        10% differential between responders in active group vs. control group
      (95% IC) and,
        Responders were defined with 50% reduction (or greater) in mean VAS vs.
      baseline

    Statistically significant and Clinically relevant for Responders defined at 30%.
        Based on feedback from our study investigators this outcome is highly significant in
      this patient population particularly when you consider the improvement in disability
      and quality of life.
        Furthermore it is important to note that a 30% reduction in pain is the mark used by
      pharmaceutical companies when they assess whether a specific pain treatment is
      efficacious or not.
                                     The study primary end point was not met.
Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division. in pain. p-value=0,02
                   Significance was demonstrated at 30% reduction
Results: Primary Endpoint
50% Reduction in Pain on Visual Analog Scale
Continuous Proportion Responder Analysis Based on Mean Daily Average Pain Intensity
VAS Measurements With No Increase in Average Headache Frequency or Duration

                                                                                                                                      met
                                                                                           %        Control      Active
                         Patients Achieving Various Levels of                                                                       protocol
                                                                                      reduction    Group %     Group %       p-
                                      Pain Relief                                        from     responder   responder    value1
                                                                                                                                    objective
                         100%                                                                                                        (>10%
                                                                                       baseline    s (n=52)    s (n=105)
                                                                                                                                      dif.)2
Percentage of Patients




                         80%                                                           10,0%       30,8%        56,2%      0,003      Yes
                                                                                       20,0%       19,2%        40,0%      0,009      Yes
                         60%
                                                                                       30,0%       17,3%        35,2%      0,020      Yes

                         40%
                                                                                       40,0%       15,4%        25,7%      0,143       No
                                                                                       50,0%       13,5%        17,1%      0,553       No
                         20%
                                                                                       60,0%        9,6%        11,4%      0,731       No
                                                                                       70,0%        1,9%        4,8%       0,664       No
                          0%
                                0%   20%       40%      60%         80%        100%
                                                                                       80,0%        1,9%        3,8%         1         No

                                     Percentage of Pain Reduction                      90,0%        0,0%        1,0%         1         No
                                                                                       100,0%        0            0          0         No
                                     Control (n=52)           Active (n=105)

                                          The study primary end point was not met.
     Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division. in pain. p-value=0,02
                        Significance was demonstrated at 30% reduction
Results: Secondary Endpoints
 Reduction in Headache Days at the 12-Week
 Control Phase (using patient diary)
  Patient diaries recorded whether or not patients had a headache each day, the daily average
 headache intensity, and the daily headache duration, in hours.
  Data was used to identify Headache Days, defined as a day with a headache lasting four or
 more hours with at least moderate intensity.


  Visit                       Control Group (n=52)                Active Group (n=105)   P-Value

  Baseline

   Mean ( std)                       17,1 ( 8.2)                        20,5 ( 7,6)       0,011

  Week 12

   Mean Change1                     -4,3 (25,1%)                        -7,3 (35,6%)      0,02


             Significant reduction -3.0 days in Headache Days (per month) between
                              Active and Control groups (p=0.02)

Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
Results: Secondary Endpoints
 Reduction in MIDAS Disability Score at 12-Week
 Control Phase
  The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) is a questionnaire which measures
 headache-related disability during the previous 90 days.


  Visit                         Control Group (n=52)           Active Group (n=105)   P-Value

  Baseline

   Mean ( std)                       152,7 ( 77,1)                  158,4 ( 76,8)      0,664

  Week 12

   Mean Change1                            -20,4                         -64,6        <0,001


 The MIDAS questionnaire was completed at baseline and 12 weeks after the system
                                      was implanted.
 The reduction in disability of 44.1 days between the groups is statistically significant
                                        (p<0.001).

Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
Results: Pain Relief & Patient Satisfaction
12-Week Control Phase
   Active group participants reported (on average) 42,1% pain relief and 51,4% of them
  were satisfied with their level of pain relief.

           Percentage of Pain Relief Since                         Percentage of Patients Satisfied
                      Surgery                                           With Headache Relief
                                                            100%
   100%


                                                            80%
    80%


                                                            60%
    60%                                                                                        51,4%
                                         42,1%
    40%                                                     40%


                      17,2%                                                       19,2%
    20%                                                     20%


     0%                                                      0%

            Control Group (n=52)     Active Group (n=105)
                                                                      Control Group (n=52)   Active Group (n=105)



  The differences reported between the Active and Control Groups for both
              measures were statistically significant (p<0,001).
Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
Results: Quality of Life & Patient Assessment -
 Open Label Phase
                        Overall Quality of Life                  Were you satisfied with the results of your
      100%                                                                   procedure? (N=138)

                                                                               4%
       80%                                                                     n=6
                       68,4%
               64,3%

       60%
                                                                                                   Very Satisfied
                                                                        15%                 23%
                                                                        n=21                n=32   Satisfied
       40%
                                30,0%
                                                                    14%                            Unsatisfied
                                        26,3%                       n=19
                                                                                                   Very Unsatisfied
       20%                                                                        44%
                                                                                     n=60          Unable to Determine
                                                  5,7%    5,3%

        0%
                 Improved      Stayed the Same    Deteriorated




                 Week 24 (N=140)        Week 52 (N=133)



       At the conclusion of the study 68.4% pts reported improved QOL, and 67% were
                either satisfied or very satisfied w/ the results of the therapy.
Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
Migraine Study                                      Key Results Summary

           12-Week Measures                                             Active       Control (Blind)     p-value  

   Reduction in Headache Days
                                                                 36% reduction       25% reduction       p=0.02
         (Patient Diary)

   Reduction in Headache Days
                                                                 28% reduction        4% reduction       <0,001
            (MIDAS)

  Migraine Disability Assessment
                                                                 41% reduction       13% reduction       <0,001
             (MIDAS)

      Headache relief on 5-point
                                                            53% excellent, good    17% excellent, good   <0,001
               scale

           Improvement in QOL                                    67% improved        17% improved        <0,001

     Satisfaction with Headache
                                                                  51% satisfied      19% improved        <0,001
                Relief


©2011 St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division. All rights reserved.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Delirium in critically ill patients bogota043009
Delirium in critically ill patients bogota043009Delirium in critically ill patients bogota043009
Delirium in critically ill patients bogota043009hospira2010
 
Enhancing Physician Competencies for Shared Decision Making in Primary Care
Enhancing Physician Competencies for Shared Decision Making in Primary CareEnhancing Physician Competencies for Shared Decision Making in Primary Care
Enhancing Physician Competencies for Shared Decision Making in Primary CareInformed Medical Decisions Foundation
 
Measures And Feedback
Measures And FeedbackMeasures And Feedback
Measures And FeedbackScott Miller
 
Aha2009 1055
Aha2009 1055Aha2009 1055
Aha2009 1055hospital
 
Nonverbal Communication: Eye contact between physicians and older-patients i...
Nonverbal Communication:  Eye contact between physicians and older-patients i...Nonverbal Communication:  Eye contact between physicians and older-patients i...
Nonverbal Communication: Eye contact between physicians and older-patients i...rgbhat
 
Exercise Council Dec08 90 Day Report
Exercise Council Dec08 90 Day ReportExercise Council Dec08 90 Day Report
Exercise Council Dec08 90 Day Reportfredarnstein
 
Artigo (acupuntura) - Efeito placebo da acupuntura
Artigo (acupuntura) - Efeito placebo da acupunturaArtigo (acupuntura) - Efeito placebo da acupuntura
Artigo (acupuntura) - Efeito placebo da acupunturaRenato Almeida
 
How to assess evidence
How to assess evidenceHow to assess evidence
How to assess evidenceRamy Ishaq
 
Evaluate and Compare the Effectiveness of Back Care with Traditional Method v...
Evaluate and Compare the Effectiveness of Back Care with Traditional Method v...Evaluate and Compare the Effectiveness of Back Care with Traditional Method v...
Evaluate and Compare the Effectiveness of Back Care with Traditional Method v...ijtsrd
 
“Talk to me”: A Self-applied Telepsychology Programme for Treatment of Fear o...
“Talk to me”: A Self-applied Telepsychology Programme for Treatment of Fear o...“Talk to me”: A Self-applied Telepsychology Programme for Treatment of Fear o...
“Talk to me”: A Self-applied Telepsychology Programme for Treatment of Fear o...Plan de Calidad para el SNS
 
CATT TRIAL DR AJAY DUDANI
CATT TRIAL DR AJAY DUDANICATT TRIAL DR AJAY DUDANI
CATT TRIAL DR AJAY DUDANIAjayDudani1
 
Improving clinical care_through_quality_improvement_april_23_2012_final
Improving clinical care_through_quality_improvement_april_23_2012_finalImproving clinical care_through_quality_improvement_april_23_2012_final
Improving clinical care_through_quality_improvement_april_23_2012_finalCarol Callaway-Lane
 
Clinical supervision its influence on client-rated working alliance and clie...
Clinical supervision  its influence on client-rated working alliance and clie...Clinical supervision  its influence on client-rated working alliance and clie...
Clinical supervision its influence on client-rated working alliance and clie...Daryl Chow
 
Clahrc audit 16_10_12
Clahrc audit 16_10_12Clahrc audit 16_10_12
Clahrc audit 16_10_12catherhu
 

Tendances (17)

Delirium in critically ill patients bogota043009
Delirium in critically ill patients bogota043009Delirium in critically ill patients bogota043009
Delirium in critically ill patients bogota043009
 
Enhancing Physician Competencies for Shared Decision Making in Primary Care
Enhancing Physician Competencies for Shared Decision Making in Primary CareEnhancing Physician Competencies for Shared Decision Making in Primary Care
Enhancing Physician Competencies for Shared Decision Making in Primary Care
 
Measures And Feedback
Measures And FeedbackMeasures And Feedback
Measures And Feedback
 
Aha2009 1055
Aha2009 1055Aha2009 1055
Aha2009 1055
 
Nonverbal Communication: Eye contact between physicians and older-patients i...
Nonverbal Communication:  Eye contact between physicians and older-patients i...Nonverbal Communication:  Eye contact between physicians and older-patients i...
Nonverbal Communication: Eye contact between physicians and older-patients i...
 
Exercise Council Dec08 90 Day Report
Exercise Council Dec08 90 Day ReportExercise Council Dec08 90 Day Report
Exercise Council Dec08 90 Day Report
 
Artigo (acupuntura) - Efeito placebo da acupuntura
Artigo (acupuntura) - Efeito placebo da acupunturaArtigo (acupuntura) - Efeito placebo da acupuntura
Artigo (acupuntura) - Efeito placebo da acupuntura
 
How to assess evidence
How to assess evidenceHow to assess evidence
How to assess evidence
 
Evaluate and Compare the Effectiveness of Back Care with Traditional Method v...
Evaluate and Compare the Effectiveness of Back Care with Traditional Method v...Evaluate and Compare the Effectiveness of Back Care with Traditional Method v...
Evaluate and Compare the Effectiveness of Back Care with Traditional Method v...
 
“Talk to me”: A Self-applied Telepsychology Programme for Treatment of Fear o...
“Talk to me”: A Self-applied Telepsychology Programme for Treatment of Fear o...“Talk to me”: A Self-applied Telepsychology Programme for Treatment of Fear o...
“Talk to me”: A Self-applied Telepsychology Programme for Treatment of Fear o...
 
A tool to measure the success of patient handling interventions
A tool to measure the success of patient handling interventionsA tool to measure the success of patient handling interventions
A tool to measure the success of patient handling interventions
 
CATT TRIAL DR AJAY DUDANI
CATT TRIAL DR AJAY DUDANICATT TRIAL DR AJAY DUDANI
CATT TRIAL DR AJAY DUDANI
 
The ASSET Trial
The ASSET TrialThe ASSET Trial
The ASSET Trial
 
Improving clinical care_through_quality_improvement_april_23_2012_final
Improving clinical care_through_quality_improvement_april_23_2012_finalImproving clinical care_through_quality_improvement_april_23_2012_final
Improving clinical care_through_quality_improvement_april_23_2012_final
 
Clinical supervision its influence on client-rated working alliance and clie...
Clinical supervision  its influence on client-rated working alliance and clie...Clinical supervision  its influence on client-rated working alliance and clie...
Clinical supervision its influence on client-rated working alliance and clie...
 
Clahrc audit 16_10_12
Clahrc audit 16_10_12Clahrc audit 16_10_12
Clahrc audit 16_10_12
 
Nursing assessment
Nursing assessmentNursing assessment
Nursing assessment
 

Similaire à Migraine neurology ppt shortened__revised_v4_final

Salon 1 14 kasim 15.30 17.00 duygu demi̇r-ing
Salon 1 14 kasim 15.30 17.00 duygu demi̇r-ingSalon 1 14 kasim 15.30 17.00 duygu demi̇r-ing
Salon 1 14 kasim 15.30 17.00 duygu demi̇r-ingtyfngnc
 
Economic evaluation. Cost-effectiveness of nutritional intervention on healin...
Economic evaluation. Cost-effectiveness of nutritional intervention on healin...Economic evaluation. Cost-effectiveness of nutritional intervention on healin...
Economic evaluation. Cost-effectiveness of nutritional intervention on healin...HTAi Bilbao 2012
 
The New 2018 SCCM PADIS Guidelines: Quick Hits of Recommendations for Sedatio...
The New 2018 SCCM PADIS Guidelines: Quick Hits of Recommendations for Sedatio...The New 2018 SCCM PADIS Guidelines: Quick Hits of Recommendations for Sedatio...
The New 2018 SCCM PADIS Guidelines: Quick Hits of Recommendations for Sedatio...Intensive Care Society
 
2014-10-22 EUGM | WEI | Moving Beyond the Comfort Zone in Practicing Translat...
2014-10-22 EUGM | WEI | Moving Beyond the Comfort Zone in Practicing Translat...2014-10-22 EUGM | WEI | Moving Beyond the Comfort Zone in Practicing Translat...
2014-10-22 EUGM | WEI | Moving Beyond the Comfort Zone in Practicing Translat...Cytel USA
 
ABC1 - O. Pagani - State-of-the-art HT treatment in ER+ disease
ABC1 - O. Pagani - State-of-the-art HT treatment in ER+ disease ABC1 - O. Pagani - State-of-the-art HT treatment in ER+ disease
ABC1 - O. Pagani - State-of-the-art HT treatment in ER+ disease European School of Oncology
 
Course Project Phase TwoPavel GarbuzApril 12th, 2017.docx
Course Project Phase TwoPavel GarbuzApril 12th, 2017.docxCourse Project Phase TwoPavel GarbuzApril 12th, 2017.docx
Course Project Phase TwoPavel GarbuzApril 12th, 2017.docxvanesaburnand
 
Bronfort 2012 annals
Bronfort 2012 annalsBronfort 2012 annals
Bronfort 2012 annalsecupresident
 
Delirium (Charmaine Berggreen)
Delirium (Charmaine Berggreen)Delirium (Charmaine Berggreen)
Delirium (Charmaine Berggreen)honorhealth
 
Influence of Interns, Residents and Attendings on Inpaitient Length of Stay 4...
Influence of Interns, Residents and Attendings on Inpaitient Length of Stay 4...Influence of Interns, Residents and Attendings on Inpaitient Length of Stay 4...
Influence of Interns, Residents and Attendings on Inpaitient Length of Stay 4...Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
 
Reducing Pain in the Abbott Northwestern Hospital Emergency Department Throug...
Reducing Pain in the Abbott Northwestern Hospital Emergency Department Throug...Reducing Pain in the Abbott Northwestern Hospital Emergency Department Throug...
Reducing Pain in the Abbott Northwestern Hospital Emergency Department Throug...Allina Health
 
Topical WBI - 1001 is effective in the treatment of mild to moderate psoriasi...
Topical WBI - 1001 is effective in the treatment of mild to moderate psoriasi...Topical WBI - 1001 is effective in the treatment of mild to moderate psoriasi...
Topical WBI - 1001 is effective in the treatment of mild to moderate psoriasi...innovaderm
 
Nfhk2011 birthe dinesen_parallel17
Nfhk2011 birthe dinesen_parallel17Nfhk2011 birthe dinesen_parallel17
Nfhk2011 birthe dinesen_parallel17NFHK2011
 
CBT interventions for Panic Disorder
CBT interventions for Panic DisorderCBT interventions for Panic Disorder
CBT interventions for Panic Disorderjohnsikorski
 
2015: Pain Assessment, the Key to Treating Pain in the Inpatient Setting-Yi
2015: Pain Assessment, the Key to Treating Pain in the Inpatient Setting-Yi2015: Pain Assessment, the Key to Treating Pain in the Inpatient Setting-Yi
2015: Pain Assessment, the Key to Treating Pain in the Inpatient Setting-YiSDGWEP
 
Actrims 2016 oratorio poster montalban_p023 (1)
Actrims 2016 oratorio poster montalban_p023 (1)Actrims 2016 oratorio poster montalban_p023 (1)
Actrims 2016 oratorio poster montalban_p023 (1)BartsMSBlog
 
Advances in depression treatment
Advances in depression treatmentAdvances in depression treatment
Advances in depression treatmentVia Christi Health
 
Running head NECK PAIN .docx
Running head NECK PAIN                                           .docxRunning head NECK PAIN                                           .docx
Running head NECK PAIN .docxtoltonkendal
 

Similaire à Migraine neurology ppt shortened__revised_v4_final (20)

Salon 1 14 kasim 15.30 17.00 duygu demi̇r-ing
Salon 1 14 kasim 15.30 17.00 duygu demi̇r-ingSalon 1 14 kasim 15.30 17.00 duygu demi̇r-ing
Salon 1 14 kasim 15.30 17.00 duygu demi̇r-ing
 
Measuring and Improving Decision Quality
Measuring and Improving Decision QualityMeasuring and Improving Decision Quality
Measuring and Improving Decision Quality
 
Economic evaluation. Cost-effectiveness of nutritional intervention on healin...
Economic evaluation. Cost-effectiveness of nutritional intervention on healin...Economic evaluation. Cost-effectiveness of nutritional intervention on healin...
Economic evaluation. Cost-effectiveness of nutritional intervention on healin...
 
The New 2018 SCCM PADIS Guidelines: Quick Hits of Recommendations for Sedatio...
The New 2018 SCCM PADIS Guidelines: Quick Hits of Recommendations for Sedatio...The New 2018 SCCM PADIS Guidelines: Quick Hits of Recommendations for Sedatio...
The New 2018 SCCM PADIS Guidelines: Quick Hits of Recommendations for Sedatio...
 
2014-10-22 EUGM | WEI | Moving Beyond the Comfort Zone in Practicing Translat...
2014-10-22 EUGM | WEI | Moving Beyond the Comfort Zone in Practicing Translat...2014-10-22 EUGM | WEI | Moving Beyond the Comfort Zone in Practicing Translat...
2014-10-22 EUGM | WEI | Moving Beyond the Comfort Zone in Practicing Translat...
 
ABC1 - O. Pagani - State-of-the-art HT treatment in ER+ disease
ABC1 - O. Pagani - State-of-the-art HT treatment in ER+ disease ABC1 - O. Pagani - State-of-the-art HT treatment in ER+ disease
ABC1 - O. Pagani - State-of-the-art HT treatment in ER+ disease
 
Course Project Phase TwoPavel GarbuzApril 12th, 2017.docx
Course Project Phase TwoPavel GarbuzApril 12th, 2017.docxCourse Project Phase TwoPavel GarbuzApril 12th, 2017.docx
Course Project Phase TwoPavel GarbuzApril 12th, 2017.docx
 
Zinc study
Zinc studyZinc study
Zinc study
 
Bronfort 2012 annals
Bronfort 2012 annalsBronfort 2012 annals
Bronfort 2012 annals
 
Delirium (Charmaine Berggreen)
Delirium (Charmaine Berggreen)Delirium (Charmaine Berggreen)
Delirium (Charmaine Berggreen)
 
File2
File2File2
File2
 
Influence of Interns, Residents and Attendings on Inpaitient Length of Stay 4...
Influence of Interns, Residents and Attendings on Inpaitient Length of Stay 4...Influence of Interns, Residents and Attendings on Inpaitient Length of Stay 4...
Influence of Interns, Residents and Attendings on Inpaitient Length of Stay 4...
 
Reducing Pain in the Abbott Northwestern Hospital Emergency Department Throug...
Reducing Pain in the Abbott Northwestern Hospital Emergency Department Throug...Reducing Pain in the Abbott Northwestern Hospital Emergency Department Throug...
Reducing Pain in the Abbott Northwestern Hospital Emergency Department Throug...
 
Topical WBI - 1001 is effective in the treatment of mild to moderate psoriasi...
Topical WBI - 1001 is effective in the treatment of mild to moderate psoriasi...Topical WBI - 1001 is effective in the treatment of mild to moderate psoriasi...
Topical WBI - 1001 is effective in the treatment of mild to moderate psoriasi...
 
Nfhk2011 birthe dinesen_parallel17
Nfhk2011 birthe dinesen_parallel17Nfhk2011 birthe dinesen_parallel17
Nfhk2011 birthe dinesen_parallel17
 
CBT interventions for Panic Disorder
CBT interventions for Panic DisorderCBT interventions for Panic Disorder
CBT interventions for Panic Disorder
 
2015: Pain Assessment, the Key to Treating Pain in the Inpatient Setting-Yi
2015: Pain Assessment, the Key to Treating Pain in the Inpatient Setting-Yi2015: Pain Assessment, the Key to Treating Pain in the Inpatient Setting-Yi
2015: Pain Assessment, the Key to Treating Pain in the Inpatient Setting-Yi
 
Actrims 2016 oratorio poster montalban_p023 (1)
Actrims 2016 oratorio poster montalban_p023 (1)Actrims 2016 oratorio poster montalban_p023 (1)
Actrims 2016 oratorio poster montalban_p023 (1)
 
Advances in depression treatment
Advances in depression treatmentAdvances in depression treatment
Advances in depression treatment
 
Running head NECK PAIN .docx
Running head NECK PAIN                                           .docxRunning head NECK PAIN                                           .docx
Running head NECK PAIN .docx
 

Plus de Manzon

DR MANZO NEUROCHIRURGIEN Chu de Fort de France !!!
DR MANZO NEUROCHIRURGIEN Chu de Fort de France !!!DR MANZO NEUROCHIRURGIEN Chu de Fort de France !!!
DR MANZO NEUROCHIRURGIEN Chu de Fort de France !!!Manzon
 
DR manzo norbert-NEUROCHIRURGIEN DES HÔPITAUX
DR manzo norbert-NEUROCHIRURGIEN DES HÔPITAUXDR manzo norbert-NEUROCHIRURGIEN DES HÔPITAUX
DR manzo norbert-NEUROCHIRURGIEN DES HÔPITAUXManzon
 
Chu de Fort de France !!! dr manzo-neurochirurgien des hôpitaux
Chu de Fort de France !!! dr manzo-neurochirurgien des hôpitauxChu de Fort de France !!! dr manzo-neurochirurgien des hôpitaux
Chu de Fort de France !!! dr manzo-neurochirurgien des hôpitauxManzon
 
Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Manzon
 
Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Manzon
 
Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Manzon
 
Chu Fort de France !!!
Chu Fort de France !!!Chu Fort de France !!!
Chu Fort de France !!!Manzon
 
Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Manzon
 
Chu Fort de France !!!
Chu Fort de France !!!Chu Fort de France !!!
Chu Fort de France !!!Manzon
 
Dr manzo-Chu Fort de France !!!
Dr manzo-Chu Fort de France !!!Dr manzo-Chu Fort de France !!!
Dr manzo-Chu Fort de France !!!Manzon
 
Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Manzon
 
Chu Fort de France!!!
Chu Fort de France!!!Chu Fort de France!!!
Chu Fort de France!!!Manzon
 
Chu Fort de France!!!
Chu Fort de France!!!Chu Fort de France!!!
Chu Fort de France!!!Manzon
 
Dr manzo
Dr manzoDr manzo
Dr manzoManzon
 
Dr manzo
Dr manzoDr manzo
Dr manzoManzon
 
Conseil de l'ordre
Conseil de l'ordreConseil de l'ordre
Conseil de l'ordreManzon
 
Chu Fort de France!!!
Chu Fort de France!!!Chu Fort de France!!!
Chu Fort de France!!!Manzon
 
Poster congrès snclf3
Poster congrès snclf3Poster congrès snclf3
Poster congrès snclf3Manzon
 

Plus de Manzon (18)

DR MANZO NEUROCHIRURGIEN Chu de Fort de France !!!
DR MANZO NEUROCHIRURGIEN Chu de Fort de France !!!DR MANZO NEUROCHIRURGIEN Chu de Fort de France !!!
DR MANZO NEUROCHIRURGIEN Chu de Fort de France !!!
 
DR manzo norbert-NEUROCHIRURGIEN DES HÔPITAUX
DR manzo norbert-NEUROCHIRURGIEN DES HÔPITAUXDR manzo norbert-NEUROCHIRURGIEN DES HÔPITAUX
DR manzo norbert-NEUROCHIRURGIEN DES HÔPITAUX
 
Chu de Fort de France !!! dr manzo-neurochirurgien des hôpitaux
Chu de Fort de France !!! dr manzo-neurochirurgien des hôpitauxChu de Fort de France !!! dr manzo-neurochirurgien des hôpitaux
Chu de Fort de France !!! dr manzo-neurochirurgien des hôpitaux
 
Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!
 
Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!
 
Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!
 
Chu Fort de France !!!
Chu Fort de France !!!Chu Fort de France !!!
Chu Fort de France !!!
 
Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!
 
Chu Fort de France !!!
Chu Fort de France !!!Chu Fort de France !!!
Chu Fort de France !!!
 
Dr manzo-Chu Fort de France !!!
Dr manzo-Chu Fort de France !!!Dr manzo-Chu Fort de France !!!
Dr manzo-Chu Fort de France !!!
 
Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!Chu de Fort de France !!!
Chu de Fort de France !!!
 
Chu Fort de France!!!
Chu Fort de France!!!Chu Fort de France!!!
Chu Fort de France!!!
 
Chu Fort de France!!!
Chu Fort de France!!!Chu Fort de France!!!
Chu Fort de France!!!
 
Dr manzo
Dr manzoDr manzo
Dr manzo
 
Dr manzo
Dr manzoDr manzo
Dr manzo
 
Conseil de l'ordre
Conseil de l'ordreConseil de l'ordre
Conseil de l'ordre
 
Chu Fort de France!!!
Chu Fort de France!!!Chu Fort de France!!!
Chu Fort de France!!!
 
Poster congrès snclf3
Poster congrès snclf3Poster congrès snclf3
Poster congrès snclf3
 

Migraine neurology ppt shortened__revised_v4_final

  • 1. Neuromodulation Division Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of the Occipital Nerves for Chronic Migraine Clinical Study Results
  • 2. Clinical Study Design Patient Enrolled Group A: Active PNS Implanted 2:1 Ratio Randomize and Device Activation Group B: Control (Blind) 80- to 90-day roll in 4-week visit 12-week visit 24-week visit 52-week visit The integrity of the Control (or blind) group was maintained as: 1/ Both patients in the Control group, and the study investigator were blinded, so nobody knew who was active or control 2/ All Control patients were given programmers that appeared to be functioning, but did not communicate with the IPG (for the first 12 weeks). 3/ Patients in the control group were told that a range of different settings were being tested which was not indicative of whether they were in the control or active group. Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
  • 3. Clinical Study Design Study Inclusion Criteria Study Exclusion Criteria Diagnosed with chronic migraine Patients identified as having Medication Overuse Headache (MOH) - per headache days/month assessment by study investigator Has tried at least 2 migraine-specific Patients who within 8 weeks prior to initial acute medications and at least 2 baseline have started new medications or different classes of prophylactic therapy to treat headache pain medications and found to be refractory Patients who had tried Botox who had tried VAS score of 6 cm (or greater) 6 months prior to on a 10-cm line initial baseline Headache pain is posterior head pain or Patients who have undergone a destructive pain originating in the cervical region procedure affecting C2/C3/occipital distribution Cervical abnormality that does not allow for placement of the percutaneous lead The above inclusion/ exclusion criteria were used in the clinical research to define the study population for chronic migraine. Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
  • 4. Baseline Patient Demographics Control Group Active Group (N=52) (N=105) Mean (+std) 44,6 (+ 10,3) 45,0 (+ 11,3) Age Range 23 65 18 72 Male 9 (17,3%) 24 (22,9%) Gender Female 43 (82,7%) 81 (77,1%) Mean (+std) 24,6 + 13,3 21,9 + 14,9 Duration of Headache (yrs) Range 2,4 54 1,3 66 Baseline Number of Headache Days Mean (+std) 72,3 (+ 23,5) 80,7 (+ 18,2) (out of 90 From MIDAS Questionnaire) Study participants in the active and control groups were similar at baseline Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
  • 5. Results: Primary Endpoint 50% Reduction in Pain on VAS Continuous Proportion Responder Analysis Based on Mean Daily Average Pain Intensity VAS Measurements With No Increase in Average Headache Frequency or Duration Primary Endpoint: The primary endpoint in the study was a statistical reference point imposed by the FDA: 10% differential between responders in active group vs. control group (95% IC) and, Responders were defined with 50% reduction (or greater) in mean VAS vs. baseline Statistically significant and Clinically relevant for Responders defined at 30%. Based on feedback from our study investigators this outcome is highly significant in this patient population particularly when you consider the improvement in disability and quality of life. Furthermore it is important to note that a 30% reduction in pain is the mark used by pharmaceutical companies when they assess whether a specific pain treatment is efficacious or not. The study primary end point was not met. Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division. in pain. p-value=0,02 Significance was demonstrated at 30% reduction
  • 6. Results: Primary Endpoint 50% Reduction in Pain on Visual Analog Scale Continuous Proportion Responder Analysis Based on Mean Daily Average Pain Intensity VAS Measurements With No Increase in Average Headache Frequency or Duration met % Control Active Patients Achieving Various Levels of protocol reduction Group % Group % p- Pain Relief from responder responder value1 objective 100% (>10% baseline s (n=52) s (n=105) dif.)2 Percentage of Patients 80% 10,0% 30,8% 56,2% 0,003 Yes 20,0% 19,2% 40,0% 0,009 Yes 60% 30,0% 17,3% 35,2% 0,020 Yes 40% 40,0% 15,4% 25,7% 0,143 No 50,0% 13,5% 17,1% 0,553 No 20% 60,0% 9,6% 11,4% 0,731 No 70,0% 1,9% 4,8% 0,664 No 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 80,0% 1,9% 3,8% 1 No Percentage of Pain Reduction 90,0% 0,0% 1,0% 1 No 100,0% 0 0 0 No Control (n=52) Active (n=105) The study primary end point was not met. Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division. in pain. p-value=0,02 Significance was demonstrated at 30% reduction
  • 7. Results: Secondary Endpoints Reduction in Headache Days at the 12-Week Control Phase (using patient diary) Patient diaries recorded whether or not patients had a headache each day, the daily average headache intensity, and the daily headache duration, in hours. Data was used to identify Headache Days, defined as a day with a headache lasting four or more hours with at least moderate intensity. Visit Control Group (n=52) Active Group (n=105) P-Value Baseline Mean ( std) 17,1 ( 8.2) 20,5 ( 7,6) 0,011 Week 12 Mean Change1 -4,3 (25,1%) -7,3 (35,6%) 0,02 Significant reduction -3.0 days in Headache Days (per month) between Active and Control groups (p=0.02) Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
  • 8. Results: Secondary Endpoints Reduction in MIDAS Disability Score at 12-Week Control Phase The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) is a questionnaire which measures headache-related disability during the previous 90 days. Visit Control Group (n=52) Active Group (n=105) P-Value Baseline Mean ( std) 152,7 ( 77,1) 158,4 ( 76,8) 0,664 Week 12 Mean Change1 -20,4 -64,6 <0,001 The MIDAS questionnaire was completed at baseline and 12 weeks after the system was implanted. The reduction in disability of 44.1 days between the groups is statistically significant (p<0.001). Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
  • 9. Results: Pain Relief & Patient Satisfaction 12-Week Control Phase Active group participants reported (on average) 42,1% pain relief and 51,4% of them were satisfied with their level of pain relief. Percentage of Pain Relief Since Percentage of Patients Satisfied Surgery With Headache Relief 100% 100% 80% 80% 60% 60% 51,4% 42,1% 40% 40% 17,2% 19,2% 20% 20% 0% 0% Control Group (n=52) Active Group (n=105) Control Group (n=52) Active Group (n=105) The differences reported between the Active and Control Groups for both measures were statistically significant (p<0,001). Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
  • 10. Results: Quality of Life & Patient Assessment - Open Label Phase Overall Quality of Life Were you satisfied with the results of your 100% procedure? (N=138) 4% 80% n=6 68,4% 64,3% 60% Very Satisfied 15% 23% n=21 n=32 Satisfied 40% 30,0% 14% Unsatisfied 26,3% n=19 Very Unsatisfied 20% 44% n=60 Unable to Determine 5,7% 5,3% 0% Improved Stayed the Same Deteriorated Week 24 (N=140) Week 52 (N=133) At the conclusion of the study 68.4% pts reported improved QOL, and 67% were either satisfied or very satisfied w/ the results of the therapy. Confidential. For Internal Use Only. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division.
  • 11. Migraine Study Key Results Summary 12-Week Measures   Active   Control (Blind)   p-value   Reduction in Headache Days 36% reduction 25% reduction p=0.02 (Patient Diary) Reduction in Headache Days 28% reduction 4% reduction <0,001 (MIDAS) Migraine Disability Assessment 41% reduction 13% reduction <0,001 (MIDAS) Headache relief on 5-point 53% excellent, good 17% excellent, good <0,001 scale Improvement in QOL 67% improved 17% improved <0,001 Satisfaction with Headache 51% satisfied 19% improved <0,001 Relief ©2011 St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division. All rights reserved.