SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  1
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2007
www.PosterPresentations.com
The Neuroscience of Reading
Sara Kazemi and Cristal Mejia-Arrechea
San Diego State University ● College of Education ● School of Teacher Education
The History of Written Systems A Neurological Model of Reading
Visual patterns of language recognized by the brain’s letterbox
are sent, in parallel, to various locations throughout the left
hemisphere of the brain (Figure 4). These areas include areas of
the temporal and frontal lobes that encode word meaning and
areas of the frontal lobe that deal with motor functions for
articulation such as Broca’s area.
While these areas are not solely used for reading, the
interconnection between these systems are crucial for people to
be able to read, to articulate what is read, and to comprehend
and encode the information being read.
Figure 4. A temporal series of EEG images reveals the neural pathways
that are activated during reading (Dahaene, 2009).
Developmental Stages of Reading
Protoliteracy Stage.
According to Barron (1992; in Reed, 2006), long before a child
begins to learn to read, she develops preliminary abilities. Two of
these abilities that serve as strong predictors of later reading
ability are the child’s phonological awareness (Figure 5) and
ability to recognize letters.
Logographic Stage.
Generally, at around age 5 or 6, children enter the logographic
stage of reading (Frith, 1985; in Reed, 2006). The visual systems
of the brain attempt to recognize words as if they were objects or
faces, paying attention to features such as shape, color, letter
orientation, and curvature (Dahaene, 2009).
At this stage, a child might recognize their own name or highly
relevant words such as a favorite food or drink.
Phonological Stage.
During the phonological stage, children are able to decode a
language’s graphemes into their corresponding phonemes. This
is an important stage as the child develops phonemic
awareness--that known letters can be rearranged to represent
new words. This discovery is not automatic and must be explicitly
taught (Morais, 1979; in Dahaene, 2009). At the phonological
stage, reading speed is strongly dependent on word length, as
the child deciphers the sound of a word one letter at a time.
Orthographic Stage.
As a developing reader reaches a higher level of reading
expertise, reading speed becomes less associated with the
length of the word and more highly associated with word
familiarity (Dahaene, 2009). Words that have been encountered
at a higher frequency take less time to decode and read than
words that are rarely or newly encountered. It is in this stage that
we can seemingly map words to meaning instantaneously. In
reality, the brain must perform a number of complex operations to
get from form to meaning, taking apart each string and
recomposing it into “a hierarchy of letters, bigrams, syllables, and
morphemes” (Dahaene, 2009).
Prior Knowledge and Reading Comprehension
References
Extant research maintains that the amount of prior knowledge of
a subject a learner has is strongly associated with how much new
information related to the subject she will retain. To illustrate this,
read the selection devised by Branson and Johnson (1973, p.
392; in Reed, 2006):
If the balloons popped, the sound wouldn’t be able to carry, since
everything would be too far away from the correct floor. A closed
window would also prevent the sound from carrying, since most
buildings tend to be well insulated. Since the whole operation
depends on a steady flow of electricity, a break in the middle of
the wire would also cause problems. Of course, the fellow could
shout, but the human voice is not loud enough to carry that far.
An additional problem is that a string could break on the
instrument. Then there could be no accompaniment to the
message. It is clear that the best situation would involve less
distance. Then there would be fewer potential problems. With
face to face contact, the least number of things could go wrong.
Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the Brain: The New Science of How We Read.
Penguin Group: New York, NY.
Gazzaniga, M.S., Ivry, R.B., and Mangun, G.R. (2014). Cognitive Neuroscience:
The Biology of the Mind. W.W. Norton & Company: New York, NY.
Nakanishi, A. (1990). The Writing Systems of the World. Tuttle Publishing:
Boston, MA.
Reed, S.K. (2006). Cognition: Theories and Applications. Wadsworth: Belmont,
CA.
Wolf, M., Vellutiino, F., and Gleason, J.B. (1997). "A Psycholinguistic Account of
Reading. In J. B. Gleason & N. B. Ratner (Eds.). Psycholinguistics.
Harcourt Brace College Publishers: Orlando, FL.
The ability to communicate linguistically is what makes us
uniquely human. Geschwind (1974; in Wolf, Vellutino, and
Gleason, 1997) argues that this unique human development led
to changes in our neuroanatomy. The structure and development
of written systems may reveal some things about our neurological
capabilities to process such systems.
The earliest known written system, developed around 3100 B.C.
by the Sumerians, were pictographs (Figure 1). Pictographs are
small pictures that directly represent a whole object or concept.
Figure 1. Sumerian pictographs (Sugi, 1968; in Nakanishi, 1990)
Figure 2. Japanese newspaper (Nakanishi, 1990).
Throughout the history of language, the development of new
writing systems has gradually become more abstract--from
representing whole objects, to representing individual syllables
or phonemes in a language. While more abstract, syllable- and
phoneme-based writing systems are generally more cognitively
efficient, particularly during the language acquisition stage,
since there are fewer symbols to encode into and retrieve from
memory (Wolf et al, 1997).
The Japanese language (Figure 2) uses two sets of syllabaries--
one for foreign words (Katakana) and another for Japanese
words. In addition to these syllabaries, Japanese has adopted
Chinese logographs--characters that represent entire words--
into a system known as Kanji. More recently, Japanese has
adopted the Roman alphabet (also known as the Latin alphabet)
for certain words--usually foreign abbreviations like “CD”--as
well.
The human brain has evolved several specialized areas that
allow us to perform the complex behavior of reading (Figure 3).
Although these systems are explained step-by-step, these
systems act in parallel.
When a person looks at words on a page or a billboard, that
visual sensory input is perceived through the eyes and sent to the
occipital lobe (shown in blue in Figure 3) and quickly recognized
as language by the ventral occipito-temporal region--an area of
the brain that joins the occipital (visual) and temporal
(comprehension) lobes. Dahaene (2009) refers to this area as
the brain’s “letterbox.”
Figure 3. A parallel neurological model of reading (Dahaene, 2009).
Figure 5. Aspects of phonological awareness include the ability to
segment words into individual syllables, onset and rime, and
phonemes.
Lift for context

Contenu connexe

En vedette (8)

Nanterre Info décembre_2014
Nanterre Info décembre_2014Nanterre Info décembre_2014
Nanterre Info décembre_2014
 
Fondements organisationnels de la cognition sociale et l'exemple de E.Hutchins
Fondements organisationnels de la cognition sociale et l'exemple de E.HutchinsFondements organisationnels de la cognition sociale et l'exemple de E.Hutchins
Fondements organisationnels de la cognition sociale et l'exemple de E.Hutchins
 
Projet CogLab v2
Projet CogLab v2Projet CogLab v2
Projet CogLab v2
 
Cognition & Cancer
Cognition & Cancer Cognition & Cancer
Cognition & Cancer
 
Les racines biologiques de la cognition / connaissance
Les racines biologiques de la cognition / connaissanceLes racines biologiques de la cognition / connaissance
Les racines biologiques de la cognition / connaissance
 
L’entreprise comme communication
L’entreprise comme communicationL’entreprise comme communication
L’entreprise comme communication
 
Psychology memory cognition language power point
Psychology memory cognition language power pointPsychology memory cognition language power point
Psychology memory cognition language power point
 
Psychology- Memory
Psychology- MemoryPsychology- Memory
Psychology- Memory
 

Similaire à Neuroscience-Reading

Listening comprehension in efl teaching
Listening comprehension in efl teachingListening comprehension in efl teaching
Listening comprehension in efl teaching
mora-deyanira
 
Listening Comprehension in EFL Teaching
Listening Comprehension in EFL TeachingListening Comprehension in EFL Teaching
Listening Comprehension in EFL Teaching
mora-deyanira
 
chapter 1 - Harley (2001)_Eftekhari
chapter 1 - Harley (2001)_Eftekharichapter 1 - Harley (2001)_Eftekhari
chapter 1 - Harley (2001)_Eftekhari
Nasrin Eftekhary
 
Difference Between Alphabet And International Phonetic Theory
Difference Between Alphabet And International Phonetic TheoryDifference Between Alphabet And International Phonetic Theory
Difference Between Alphabet And International Phonetic Theory
Sandy Harwell
 
. . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx
. . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx. . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx
. . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx
adkinspaige22
 
. . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx
 . . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx . . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx
. . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx
ShiraPrater50
 
1 s2.0-s0093934 x09000376-main
1 s2.0-s0093934 x09000376-main1 s2.0-s0093934 x09000376-main
1 s2.0-s0093934 x09000376-main
Garima Pant
 
Presentasi chapter iv 1 by samsul bahri
Presentasi chapter iv 1 by samsul bahriPresentasi chapter iv 1 by samsul bahri
Presentasi chapter iv 1 by samsul bahri
Samsul Ziljian
 

Similaire à Neuroscience-Reading (20)

speech production in psycholinguistics
speech production in psycholinguistics speech production in psycholinguistics
speech production in psycholinguistics
 
Listening comprehension in efl teaching
Listening comprehension in efl teachingListening comprehension in efl teaching
Listening comprehension in efl teaching
 
Listening Comprehension in EFL Teaching
Listening Comprehension in EFL TeachingListening Comprehension in EFL Teaching
Listening Comprehension in EFL Teaching
 
chapter 1 - Harley (2001)_Eftekhari
chapter 1 - Harley (2001)_Eftekharichapter 1 - Harley (2001)_Eftekhari
chapter 1 - Harley (2001)_Eftekhari
 
Psycholinguistics
PsycholinguisticsPsycholinguistics
Psycholinguistics
 
Neuroscience as a learning theory
Neuroscience as a learning theoryNeuroscience as a learning theory
Neuroscience as a learning theory
 
Makalah Phonological Construction
Makalah Phonological ConstructionMakalah Phonological Construction
Makalah Phonological Construction
 
Ehri word learning
Ehri word learningEhri word learning
Ehri word learning
 
Difference Between Alphabet And International Phonetic Theory
Difference Between Alphabet And International Phonetic TheoryDifference Between Alphabet And International Phonetic Theory
Difference Between Alphabet And International Phonetic Theory
 
. . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx
. . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx. . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx
. . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx
 
. . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx
 . . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx . . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx
. . . all human languages do share the same structure. More e.docx
 
Cognitive psychology L8 spring2019
Cognitive psychology L8 spring2019 Cognitive psychology L8 spring2019
Cognitive psychology L8 spring2019
 
Psycholinguistics
PsycholinguisticsPsycholinguistics
Psycholinguistics
 
Reading In Elt
Reading In EltReading In Elt
Reading In Elt
 
1 s2.0-s0093934 x09000376-main
1 s2.0-s0093934 x09000376-main1 s2.0-s0093934 x09000376-main
1 s2.0-s0093934 x09000376-main
 
Presentasi chapter iv 1 by samsul bahri
Presentasi chapter iv 1 by samsul bahriPresentasi chapter iv 1 by samsul bahri
Presentasi chapter iv 1 by samsul bahri
 
Psychology of SLA.
Psychology of SLA.Psychology of SLA.
Psychology of SLA.
 
Gne Ed notes 1.docx
Gne Ed notes 1.docxGne Ed notes 1.docx
Gne Ed notes 1.docx
 
Reading Workshop
Reading WorkshopReading Workshop
Reading Workshop
 
Cognition and Language
Cognition and LanguageCognition and Language
Cognition and Language
 

Neuroscience-Reading

  • 1. TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2007 www.PosterPresentations.com The Neuroscience of Reading Sara Kazemi and Cristal Mejia-Arrechea San Diego State University ● College of Education ● School of Teacher Education The History of Written Systems A Neurological Model of Reading Visual patterns of language recognized by the brain’s letterbox are sent, in parallel, to various locations throughout the left hemisphere of the brain (Figure 4). These areas include areas of the temporal and frontal lobes that encode word meaning and areas of the frontal lobe that deal with motor functions for articulation such as Broca’s area. While these areas are not solely used for reading, the interconnection between these systems are crucial for people to be able to read, to articulate what is read, and to comprehend and encode the information being read. Figure 4. A temporal series of EEG images reveals the neural pathways that are activated during reading (Dahaene, 2009). Developmental Stages of Reading Protoliteracy Stage. According to Barron (1992; in Reed, 2006), long before a child begins to learn to read, she develops preliminary abilities. Two of these abilities that serve as strong predictors of later reading ability are the child’s phonological awareness (Figure 5) and ability to recognize letters. Logographic Stage. Generally, at around age 5 or 6, children enter the logographic stage of reading (Frith, 1985; in Reed, 2006). The visual systems of the brain attempt to recognize words as if they were objects or faces, paying attention to features such as shape, color, letter orientation, and curvature (Dahaene, 2009). At this stage, a child might recognize their own name or highly relevant words such as a favorite food or drink. Phonological Stage. During the phonological stage, children are able to decode a language’s graphemes into their corresponding phonemes. This is an important stage as the child develops phonemic awareness--that known letters can be rearranged to represent new words. This discovery is not automatic and must be explicitly taught (Morais, 1979; in Dahaene, 2009). At the phonological stage, reading speed is strongly dependent on word length, as the child deciphers the sound of a word one letter at a time. Orthographic Stage. As a developing reader reaches a higher level of reading expertise, reading speed becomes less associated with the length of the word and more highly associated with word familiarity (Dahaene, 2009). Words that have been encountered at a higher frequency take less time to decode and read than words that are rarely or newly encountered. It is in this stage that we can seemingly map words to meaning instantaneously. In reality, the brain must perform a number of complex operations to get from form to meaning, taking apart each string and recomposing it into “a hierarchy of letters, bigrams, syllables, and morphemes” (Dahaene, 2009). Prior Knowledge and Reading Comprehension References Extant research maintains that the amount of prior knowledge of a subject a learner has is strongly associated with how much new information related to the subject she will retain. To illustrate this, read the selection devised by Branson and Johnson (1973, p. 392; in Reed, 2006): If the balloons popped, the sound wouldn’t be able to carry, since everything would be too far away from the correct floor. A closed window would also prevent the sound from carrying, since most buildings tend to be well insulated. Since the whole operation depends on a steady flow of electricity, a break in the middle of the wire would also cause problems. Of course, the fellow could shout, but the human voice is not loud enough to carry that far. An additional problem is that a string could break on the instrument. Then there could be no accompaniment to the message. It is clear that the best situation would involve less distance. Then there would be fewer potential problems. With face to face contact, the least number of things could go wrong. Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the Brain: The New Science of How We Read. Penguin Group: New York, NY. Gazzaniga, M.S., Ivry, R.B., and Mangun, G.R. (2014). Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind. W.W. Norton & Company: New York, NY. Nakanishi, A. (1990). The Writing Systems of the World. Tuttle Publishing: Boston, MA. Reed, S.K. (2006). Cognition: Theories and Applications. Wadsworth: Belmont, CA. Wolf, M., Vellutiino, F., and Gleason, J.B. (1997). "A Psycholinguistic Account of Reading. In J. B. Gleason & N. B. Ratner (Eds.). Psycholinguistics. Harcourt Brace College Publishers: Orlando, FL. The ability to communicate linguistically is what makes us uniquely human. Geschwind (1974; in Wolf, Vellutino, and Gleason, 1997) argues that this unique human development led to changes in our neuroanatomy. The structure and development of written systems may reveal some things about our neurological capabilities to process such systems. The earliest known written system, developed around 3100 B.C. by the Sumerians, were pictographs (Figure 1). Pictographs are small pictures that directly represent a whole object or concept. Figure 1. Sumerian pictographs (Sugi, 1968; in Nakanishi, 1990) Figure 2. Japanese newspaper (Nakanishi, 1990). Throughout the history of language, the development of new writing systems has gradually become more abstract--from representing whole objects, to representing individual syllables or phonemes in a language. While more abstract, syllable- and phoneme-based writing systems are generally more cognitively efficient, particularly during the language acquisition stage, since there are fewer symbols to encode into and retrieve from memory (Wolf et al, 1997). The Japanese language (Figure 2) uses two sets of syllabaries-- one for foreign words (Katakana) and another for Japanese words. In addition to these syllabaries, Japanese has adopted Chinese logographs--characters that represent entire words-- into a system known as Kanji. More recently, Japanese has adopted the Roman alphabet (also known as the Latin alphabet) for certain words--usually foreign abbreviations like “CD”--as well. The human brain has evolved several specialized areas that allow us to perform the complex behavior of reading (Figure 3). Although these systems are explained step-by-step, these systems act in parallel. When a person looks at words on a page or a billboard, that visual sensory input is perceived through the eyes and sent to the occipital lobe (shown in blue in Figure 3) and quickly recognized as language by the ventral occipito-temporal region--an area of the brain that joins the occipital (visual) and temporal (comprehension) lobes. Dahaene (2009) refers to this area as the brain’s “letterbox.” Figure 3. A parallel neurological model of reading (Dahaene, 2009). Figure 5. Aspects of phonological awareness include the ability to segment words into individual syllables, onset and rime, and phonemes. Lift for context