Design Project - Electric Furnace for Steel Making
1. DESIGN OF AN
ELECTRIC FURNACE
FOR MAKING STEEL
BY GROUP 23 :
EUGENE TEO GUO SHUN 061933G07
KENVIN TEO SHI YU 061932E07
JOELTEE HAN YUN 060420D07
FIZH TO CHUN YU 060324H07
2. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
List of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION
2. MOTIVATION
3. SCOPE
4. CURRENT OPERATION OF MAKING STEEL
5. LITERATURE REVIEW
6. WHY STAINLESS STEEL?
7. MATERIALS SELECTION
8. DISCUSSIONS
9. RECOMMENDATIONS
10. REVIEW
11. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
3. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Introduction
Steel making can be separated into two categories- primary and
secondary
Current trend – using of electric arc furnace (EAF)
Advantages
400 tons of steel in 60 minutes
Mass production= low price
Flexible in stopping according to demand
Disadvantages
Environmental and efficiency
Cost
4. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Motivation & Scope
The growing Steel processing industry
The gist of making stainless steel lies in the decarburization process.
2 types of decarburization processes
Vacuum oxygen decarburization (VOD)
Argon oxygen decarburization (AOD)
hassle of transferring to another ladle
focus on improving and redesigning two aspects of the existing electric
arc furnace
1. The process of vacuum decarburization
2. The stirring of the molten steel to obtain a homogenous melt.
5. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Current Operation of Making Steel
Video
6. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Literature Review
DESIGN OF AN ELECTRIC
FURNACE FOR MAKING
STEEL
Our group is going to focus on
improving the design and
manufacturing stainless steel using
the Electric Arc Furnace
7. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Literature Review
Methods of making steel (Christopher 2007)
Hits
Focuses on the method of making steel using an electric arc furnace
Manage to come out with an invention make steel at a reduced cost
Generation of source of lime compacted to form a conglomeration of
compacts; charged to the furnace in the shortest period of time to
avoid energy loss
Misses
Did not explain how different kinds of steel, like stainless steel, are
made directly from the electric arc furnace
8. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Literature Review
Making of stainless steel without using electric arc furnace (Clifford 1971)
Hits
patented a design which allowed them to produce stainless steel
without the use of an Electric Arc Furnace
Misses
Uses 2 channel furnaces
A channel furnace is employed to mix chromium containing and
chromium-free hot metal, producing a converter feed metal of desired
temperature and chemical composition.
9. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Literature Review
Making of stainless steel with an electric arc furnace without using
secondary processes (Arturo 1991)
Hits
identified the problems and enhanced the added oxygen process to
obtain good reducing conditions
Installation of devices + lance system to introduce oxygen to improve
efficiency
Misses
Never looked into reducing the loss of chromium + homogenization of
melt
10. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Literature Review
Electromagnetic Stirring
Commonly used in continuous casting of metals
Prevents the creation of inhomogeneous steel
It agitates the molten core
Balances the temperature gradient between the outer shell and inner
core of casted metal
Feasible in homogenizing the stainless steel melt in the steel making
process
11. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Why Stainless Steel?
WHAT is Stainless Steel?
Low carbon steel alloy, 10 wt% of chromium by mass, chromium oxide
layer
Advantages
1. Corrosion resistance
2. Fire & Heat Resistance
3. Hygiene
4. Aesthetic appearance
5. Strength-to-weight advantage
6. Ease of fabrication
7. Impact Resistance
8. Long term value
12. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Materials Selection
Stainless Steel chosen for the roof of electric arc furnace typically
Properties considered
1. Melting point - high
2. Fracture Toughness - high
3. Specific Heat Capacity - high
4. Thermal Expansion coefficient - high
5. Thermal Conductivity – high
Total number of decisions = N(N-1)/2 = 5(4)/2 = 10 decisions
Weighting factors method
Gathered data from CES software located at MSE computer lab
Scaled data according to criterion
Calculate Performance index
13. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Materials Selection
Table 1 Application of Digital Logic Method
Property Decision Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Melting Point 1 1 1 1
Fracture
0 0 1 0
Toughness
Specific Heat
1 1 0 0
Capacity
Thermal
Expansion 1 0 1 0
Coefficient
Thermal
0 1 0 0
Conductivity
16. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Materials Selection
As stainless steels are chosen commonly as roof material for the
typical electric arc furnace, 5 classes of stainless steels are chosen to
be analyzed.
Table 4 Scaled Values of properties and performance index Performance
Scaled (1) Scaled (2) Scaled (3) Scaled (4) Scaled(5)
Wrought 418 Martensite Stainless
39.05 3.97 20 10.91 10 83.93
Steel, tempered at 260degC
Wrought 403 Ferritic Stainless Steel,
39.05 7.65 20 12.12 10 88.82
intermediate temper
Wrought 202 Austenitic Stainless
38.38 10 21.77 20 6.52 96.66
Steel, annealed
Wrought 301 Austenitic Stainless
38.38 10 21.38 19.64 6.78 96.17
Steel
Wrought 301 Precipitation Hardening
38.38 10 21.38 19.64 6.78 96.17
Stainless Steel
Cast Duplex Stainless Steel CD-4CU 40 7.5 20 12.12 6.52 86.14
Wrought 202 Austenitic Stainless Steel, annealed, should be chosen to
be made as the roof of electric arc furnace.
17. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Vacuum Oxygen Decarburization
Concept
To produce large steel ingots, rails, ball bearings and other high quality
steels.
18. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Vacuum Oxygen Decarburization
Concept
The oxidation of liquid steel components under the influence of
vacuum would result in the oxygen being used up mainly by the
reaction [C] + [O] = {CO}
Use of Ellingham diagram
19. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Vacuum Oxygen Decarburization
Concept
A plot of Gibbs Free Energy ΔG against temperature.
The Ellingham diagram shown is for metals which react with oxygen to
form oxides.
The position of the line for a given reaction on the Ellingham diagram
shows the stability of the oxide as a function of temperature.
20. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Vacuum Oxygen Decarburization
21. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Vacuum Oxygen Decarburization
Concept
Carbon unusually useful as a reducing agent.
Ellingham Diagram
This process helps to decarburize the steel with minimum chromium
losses.
Complete deoxidizers then desulfurizing slag
Problem?
22. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Vacuum Oxygen Decarburization
Design of the Furnace in incorporating an extensible roof with vacuum
Combine step of Vacuum Oxygen Decarburization
23. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Vacuum Oxygen Decarburization
Design of the Furnace in incorporating an extensible roof with vacuum
2 roofs which are interchangeable
Simultaneous addition of oxygen
Use of Vacuum
Eliminates the need for another furnace
24. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Electromagnetic Stirring
Importance of Stirring the Molten Melt
Homogenizing of molten melt
Improving heat and mass transfer rates
Reduce processing times
Metallurgical restrictions
25. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Electromagnetic Stirring
Current Practice: Gas Stirring
Use of Inert gases
Vacuum
2 commonly used methods: Pump Outlet
Ladle Lid
gas valve
semi permeable refractory material
Safety
Height
Molten Steel Refractory
Material and
Ladle Wall
Porous Plug
Gas Injection or valve for
System gas injection
26. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Electromagnetic Stirring
Disadvantages of Gas Stirring
Additional processing step
Cost
Inability to cut off gas flow
Violent turbulence
Dangerous ejection of the melt
28. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Electromagnetic Stirring
Electromagnetic stirring: Working principle
Three Phase
Power Supply
29. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Electromagnetic Stirring
Electromagnetic stirring: 2 proposed solutions
Installation of stirrers at top of furnace
Installation of stirrers at side of furnace
30. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Electromagnetic Stirring
Proposed solution 1: Installation of Inductor at top of furnace
Top
Ring
Furnace
Lid
Energizing
(toroid) coils
Molten
Melt
X
Bottom
Refractory Ring
Material and
Ladle Wall
X
Top View of Furnace Lid
31. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Electromagnetic Stirring
Proposed solution 1: Installation of stirrers at top of furnace
Predicted Flow lines
Electromagnetic transducer
32. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Electromagnetic Stirring
Proposed solution 1: Installation of stirrers at top of furnace
Verdict: Unsuitable
Inefficient Stirring pattern generated
Inadequate Stirring strength
Stirring strength will have to rely on a single electrode
Distance of electrode to melt
Solution: Installation of stirrers at side of furnace
33. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Electromagnetic Stirring
Proposed solution 2: Installation of stirrers at side of furnace
Slag
Molten Metal
H
ν
F
Electromagnetic
transducers Electromagnetic
transducers
34. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Discussions - Electromagnetic Stirring
Proposed solution 2: Installation of stirrers at side of furnace
Final Solution
Installation of transducer at side of furnace
Summary
Placement and number of magnetic stirrers
Ability to control flow strength
Predetermined stirring patterns for optimum performance
Workable idea
35. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Recommendations
Installation of Heat Exchanger system
Improvements in Refractory Material
Refractory Cooling System
36. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Review
Summary of the current electric furnace operation present
Literature review
Why stainless steel is chosen
Materials selection of the roof for the EAF (group design)
Ellingham diagram and Vacuum Oxidation Decarburization
Design of the Furnace in incorporating an extensible roof with vacuum
Design of the Furnace by implementing and installing magnetic stirrers
– side of furnace versus top of furnace
Recommendations for future work
Last but not least . . .
37. MS 3005 DESIGN PROJECT
Questions & Answers
“Now… who ever said that steel making
was a process that is hard to
understand...”
“perhaps if your presenter was that
informative, more students will be
interested to venture into the steelmaking
industry!”
Thank you. . .
Questions and Answers
Notes de l'éditeur
Christopher (2007) focuses on the method of making steel using in an electric arc furnace out of so many furnaces. From the result of his research, he managed to come up with an invention to make steel at substantially reduced costs. Christopher (2007) identified that by charging and melting the scrap in the furnace, a source of lime will be generated. It will be compacted to form a conglomeration of compacts; charged to the furnace in the shortest period of time to avoid energy loss, and at the same time adding extra fluxing agents and additives to produce refined molten steel. As the research of Christopher (2007) focused on the provision of lime to the electric arc furnace as quick as possible, he did not go about explaining how different kinds of steel, like stainless steel, are made directly from the electric arc furnace. Rather, he placed importance on the continuous supply of lime to the furnace. Despite this, we would be able to determine the ideal design, through our results of our research, as to how stainless steel can be made using the electric arc furnace.
Christopher (2007) focuses on the method of making steel using in an electric arc furnace out of so many furnaces. From the result of his research, he managed to come up with an invention to make steel at substantially reduced costs. Christopher (2007) identified that by charging and melting the scrap in the furnace, a source of lime will be generated. It will be compacted to form a conglomeration of compacts; charged to the furnace in the shortest period of time to avoid energy loss, and at the same time adding extra fluxing agents and additives to produce refined molten steel. As the research of Christopher (2007) focused on the provision of lime to the electric arc furnace as quick as possible, he did not go about explaining how different kinds of steel, like stainless steel, are made directly from the electric arc furnace. Rather, he placed importance on the continuous supply of lime to the furnace. Despite this, we would be able to determine the ideal design, through our results of our research, as to how stainless steel can be made using the electric arc furnace.
Clifford (1971) patented a design which allowed them to produce stainless steel without using an electric arc furnace. A channel furnace is employed to mix chromium containing and chromium-free hot metal, producing a converter feed metal of desired temperature and chemical composition. Clifford (1971) also ensured that the weighted charges of such feed metal are blown in the converter, and helps in the saving of time and electricity, which yields cost savings. However, in the article, Clifford(1971) made use of 2 furnaces to carry out the steel making process. In our design, we would be aiming to resolve the issue. Not through the use of another furnace, but through re-designing the current electric arc furnace to make stainless steel using one furnace only
Arturo (1991) put forward a patented invention which involved the production of stainless steels in an electric arc furnace. His invention identified the problems of using an added oxygen process to obtain good reducing conditions. The problems were that good reducing conditions were still present even though it was more economically favourable, and also the maintenance of desired temperature in the melt. Arturo(1991)’s invention involved the installation of a charging door stopper device, bottom gas injection devices, and an oxygen by lance system. The motive of Arturo(1991) in doing that is to introduce oxygen to remove the excess carbon via an electrode at the top of the roof to decarburize the carbon, and the charging door stopper device is to prevent any melt from flowing out. Also, the bottom gas injection is to homogenize the melt. Arturo (1991)’s invention did not exactly look into reducing the loss of chromium. The introduction of gas through the bottom of the furnace cannot rule out the possibility of the melt flowing down the pipe at the bottom of the furnace. Arturo(1991)’s invention neglected the importance of maintaining the temperature, which he explained only by adjusting the arc to control the tapping temperature. Our design would look into the area of minimizing the loss of chromium, as well as achieving the ability of homogenizing the melt in the electric arc furnace.
Corrosion resistance Lower alloyed grades resist corrosion in atmospheric and pure water environments, while high-alloyed grades can resist corrosion in most acids, alkaline solutions, and chlorine bearing environments, properties which are utilized in process plants. Fire & Heat ResistanceSpecial high chromium and nickel-alloyed grades resist scaling and retain strength at high temperatures. HygieneThe easy cleaning ability of stainless makes it the first choice for strict hygiene conditions, such as hospitals, kitchens, abattoirs and other food processing plants. Aesthetic appearanceThe bright, easily maintained surface of stainless steel provides a modern and attractive appearance. 5. Strength-to-weight advantageThe work-hardening property of austenitic grades, that results in a significant strengthening of the material from cold-working alone, and the high strength duplex grades, allow reduced material thickness over conventional grades, therefore cost savings. 6. Ease of fabrication Modern steel-making techniques mean that stainless can be cut, welded, formed, machined, and fabricated as readily as traditional steels. 7. Impact ResistanceThe austenitic microstructure of the 300 series provides high toughness, from elevated temperatures to far below freezing, making these steels particularly suited to cryogenic applications. 8. Long term valueWhen the total life cycle costs are considered, stainless is often the least expensive material option.
4.2.1 400 Series Martensitic (Typical Grade: 410)Consists of Straight Chromium (12-18%), magnetic can be hardened by heat treatment. Typical use: Fasteners and pump shafts. 4.2.2 400 Series Ferritic (Typical Grade: 430)Consist of Straight Chromium (12-18%), “low carbon”, magnetic but not heat treatable. Typical use: Appliance trim, cooking utensils. 4.2.3 200/300 Series Austenitic – Typical Grade: 304Consist of Chromium (17-25%)/ Nickel (8-25%), non magnetic, not heat treatable and develops high strength by cold work. Addition of molybdenum (up to 7%) increases corrosion resistance. Typical use: Food equipments, chemical equipments, architectural applications. 4.2.4 Precipitation Hardening – Typical Grade: 17-14Consist of Chromium (17-25%)/ Nickel (3-9%), either martensitic or austenitic and develops strength by precipitation hardening reaction during heat treatment. Typical use: Valves, gears, petrochemical equipments. 4.2.5 Duplex – Typical Grade: 2205Consist of Chromium (18-25%)/ Nickel (4-7%) and up to 4% molybdenum. Has a higher resistance to stress corrosion cracking than austenitic, yet tougher than fully ferritic alloys. Typical use: Pipelines, pressure vessels, shafting. 4.3 Benefits of Stainless SteelStainless steel is a class of metal alloy with many unique properties and values making it a powerful candidate in materials selection. Engineers, Specifiers and designers often under estimate or overlook these values because of what it is viewed as the higher initial cost. However, over the total life of a project, stainless steel is often the best value option.
There is another concern which is over stirring of the molten melt. When this happens, the molten metal might be ejected causing fire hazards.
So, our proposed solution would be: Electromagnetic stirringAs mentioned by Kenvin earlier, it is a process already used in continuous casting.The advantages of Electromagnetic stirring is that itEliminates the need for an external body to be physically be in contact with the molten metal. It is also allows the user to vary the stirring strength by adjusting the power supply and the flow patterns can actually be customized accordingly. It also simplifies the entire furnace system.
Let me now explain the working principle of Electromagnetic stirring.An inductor is placed close to the molten melt with a 3 phase power supply connected to it.A magnetic field would be generated which causes an induction current to flow through the molten metal.The electromagnetic force that is created would then cause the molten metal to move in the direction of the magnetic field, creating the flow required to stir the molten melt.
For our project, we have 2 options to position the electromagnetic stirrers, either at the top or at the side of the furnace. Our group prefer to have the stirrer positioned at the top as it very much simplify the design of the furnace.
To position the stirrer at the top of the furnace, 3 inductors would be connected to the 3 phase alternating power supply.Considering the scenario where the current supplied at point X to be higher than that at points Y and Z.This would cause current to flow from point A to C and A to B, creating 2 close loop currents. However, there would be no current flowing through points BC and ZY.The 2 close loop currents will then reinforce each other and create a magnetic field under the furnace lid. As the phases of the power supply changes, the magnetic field would rotate, stirring the molten melt.
This a diagram of the predicted flow lines generated by 2 magnetic stirrers.
However, after reviewing the stir patterns created, our team felt that the stirring pattern might not sufficiently stir the molten metal.The stirring strength might also be too weak as it relies on a single electrode.Therefore, we decided try installing the magnetic stirrers at the side of the furnace instead.
With the magnetic stirrers installed at the side of the furnace, the stirring strength could be increased by simply adding more transducers.The stirring pattern would also be altered and the new “Donut shaped” stirring pattern generated would be much more effective.
To conclude, the electromagnetic stirrers would be installed at the side of the furnace so as to ensure sufficient stirring strength.The speed of stirring can also be easily varied and through proper positioning of the magnetic inductors, the flow patterns can be customized to suit the shape of the furnace. By doing so, we hope to optimize the stirring strength and speed of the furnace system.
Installation of Heat Exchanger systemTo improve energy efficiency and reduce energy consumptionHeat loss due to cooling of molten melt, can be ‘captured’ and recycled by a heat exchanger systemImprovements in Refractory MaterialIncur cost due to periodic replacement of the refractory material lining which will be damaged after several production cycles. Overall effectiveness of the arc furnace is compromised Frequent replacement of the refractory lining = …A more suitable refractory material can also be proposed to further improve overall effectiveness. Refractory Cooling SystemProlong the refractory material production life - prevent the lining from being heated to excessive levels. To control the temperature of the refractory material, a cooling system can be integrated into the arc-furnace design. To achieve optimum results, this cooling system should have some sort of feedback loop to monitor the temperature conditions at various parts of the furnace and take corrective action accordingly. The type and method of the cooling system to employ would be an ideal area to work on for future work.