Table-ronde sur "La relance de l'efficacité énergétique en Europe" : relancer, mais aussi financer ! Avec : Francisco Zuloloaga Luca Bergamaschi Adrian Joyce Antongiulio Marin Michel Lepetit Matthieu Auzanneau Ateliers du Shift du 11 décembre 2014

1. Table-ronde :
« La relance de l’efficacité
énergétique en Europe »
Partie 1 : Relancer l’efficacité énergétique en Europe
Partie 2 : Financer l’efficacité énergétique des bâtiments en Europe
www.theshiftproject.org

2. Partie 1 : Relancer l’efficacité énergétique
en Europe
Francisco Zuloaga
Associate, Energy Efficiency Program
European Climate Foundation
Luca Bergamaschi
Researcher
Think-tank E3G
Matthieu Auzanneau (modérateur)
Chargé des affaires publiques et de la prospective
The Shift Project
Adrian Joyce
Secretary General
EuroACE

3. LA RELANCE DE L’EFFICACITÉ
ÉNERGÉTIQUE EN EUROPE
Les Ateliers du Shift
11 December 2014
Francisco R. Zuloaga

4. Au menu
1. Contexte
2. Politiques européennes d’efficacité
énergétique.
3. Quoi de neuf à Bruxelles ?

5. 1. Contexte

6. The European Climate Foundation (ECF)
• Née en 2008
• Fondation privée
• 25 million € budget annuel

7. Le psychologue de l’Europe
L’EFFICACITÉ ÉNERGÉTIQUE EST LA
RÉPONSE...
...QUELLE EST VOTRE QUESTION ?
• 239 milliards €/an économisés (1000€ par ménage) en
2030.
• 2 million nouveux emplois
• Economies de 50 milliards € en importations d’énergie.
Indépendence complete du gaz russe.

8. La Cendrillon des politiques énergétiques
• Malgré bénéfices multiples, EE souvent pas
prioritaire
• Commence à changer, réel intérêt pour
l’efficacité énergétique (AIE, G20, UE, FR, etc.)
➜Réalités économiques, environnementales, sociales
;
➜Lobbying plus sophistiqué : coalitions ; nouveau
“récit”...

9. Coalition for Energy Savings (Bruxelles)

10. Energy Bill Revolution Campaign (UK)

11. Nouveau “récit”
• EE : investissement, pas une dépense.
• Bâtiment = infrastructure.
Chaque £ investie par le
Gouvernement Britannique
dans un programme de
rénovation de bâtiments
crée :
•3,20£ de PIB
•1,27£ d’impôts

12. 2. Politiques européennes
d’efficacité énergétique

13. Climat-énergie : 2020 vs 2030
Source: European Commission

14. Objectif EE : peut mieux faire…
Source: European commission

15. Quelles batailles EE en 2015-2016 ?
• Transposition + mise en œuvre des politiques
européennes.
• Révision des directives Écoconception et Étiquetage
énergétique.
• Gouvernance des objectifs climat-énergie 2030.
• Union Energétique.
et encore…
• Refonte de l’EPBD
• Révision des articles 3 & 7 de l’EED.
• Décision sur le partage de l’effort 2021-2030 dans
les secteurs non-ETS.

16. Des instruments qui fonctionnent
• Directive Écoconception
• Directive Étiquetage Énergétique
Source: www.coolproducts.eu à partir des données de la Commission Européenne
+
• 22 mesures éco-conception ; 11
étiquettes-énergie.
• Aujourd’hui : 216 €/an par
ménage Européen en économies.
• En 2020 (?), jusqu’à :
• 350 €/an économies par ménage ;
• 56 Mtoe/an et 380TWh/an ;
• 40% de l’objectif EE 2020.

17. Éco-conception et étiquetage énergétique en 2015
• Programme éco-conception 2015-2017 
quels nouveux produits ?
• Refonte de la Directive Étiquetage
Énergétique – retour à A-G ?

18. 3. Quoi de neuf à Bruxelles ?

19. News from the Brussels bubble
• Nouvelle Commission
➜Déréglementation.
➜Transparence des rdv avec la Commission.
➜Plan d’investissement Juncker.
• Nouveau Parlement
➜Plus extrême ?
• Le Conseil
➜Changements des règles de vote

20. Conclusion

21. Conclusion
• Intérêt croissant pour l’EE.
• Pas en route pour atteindre les objectifs
européens d’EE.
• Les instruments existent, il suffit d’une bonne
mise en œuvre.

22. Merci !!
frzuloaga@positive-energy.eu

23. Delivering energy security and growth
through energy efficiency
Luca Bergamaschi, E3G
December 2014

24. About E3G
December 2014 E3G 24
• E3G independent, non-profit organisation working to
accelerate the transition to sustainable development
• Founded in 2004
• Offices in London, Brussels, Berlin and Washington DC
• Programmes in China, Columbia, Peru and South Africa
• Current Funding:
– 80% grant funding from foundations and governments
– 20% advisory work for foundations, governments, NGOs

25. Four core points
1. EU faces rising security, economic and climate risks. These are systemic and
driven by territorial disputes, instability in the Middle East and North Africa, slow or zero
recovery of the EU economy, rising of new economic competitive powers, and visible
impact of climate-induced extreme weather events.
2. Managing risks require to implement strategies that maximises EU value.
Currently they lack coherence and risk wasting public and private money on expensive
but underutilised infrastructure project.
3. Energy efficiency is a game changer for lowering dependency on fuel imports,
driving economic growth, and increase competitiveness of EU industry.
However, too little has been achieved so far due to high political and financial barriers.
4. Capturing potential benefits requires on-going structural reforms. Deep reforms
are needed on fiscal rules, public investment priorities, finance to support investment,
new markets for EE goods and demand side services, institutions and governance to deal
with risks and implement reforms. Agreeing strong efficiency target in 2030 package
would be the beginning of this process.
December 2014 E3G 25

26. EU biggest importer of energy in the world
• Over half of Europe’s energy is imported,
including 90% of oil, 66% of gas, and 62% of
coal
• 26% of coal, 34% of crude oil and 32% gas
come from Russia
• Energy dependency is growing. In 1990 it stood
at 40% compared to 54% in 2013.
December 2014 E3G 26

27. Economic and social impact
• In 2011, import values equal 6.2% of EU GDP. In 2013, EU
import bill was €543 billion.
• Huge financial flow leaves EU economy, which loses control
of prices. In Germany, the price of heating oil tripled, natural
gas has doubled, and electricity rose by 75%.
• In 2012, 56 million Europeans were in fuel poverty driven by
high heating costs of inefficient buildings.
• Less leverage to invest today. Level of EU private and public
investment today is one third of pre-crisis (2007) level
December 2014 E3G 27

28. Energy efficiency (EE) as first response
• An EU-wide building retrofit programme could cut gas
use by an amount equal to 80% of Russian imports
• Ambitious energy efficiency refurbishment programmes
could save up to €500 per year to each EU citizen by
2030
• An EU-wide industrial efficiency programme allows
energy intensive and non-energy intensive industries to
produce more using lowered energy inputs.
Cost effective technologies can reduce heat loss by
66%, cut energy bills by 75%, and save energy
equivalent to 15% of 2011 Russian gas imports
December 2014 E3G 28

29. EE as first response
• These are “cost-effective” meaning that the costs of investment is
offset by savings
 Delivering the 20% EE target by 2020 would cut energy bills by
an annual €200 billion, equivalent to financial savings of up to €
1,000 per household every year
 Savings during 2020-2030 are estimated to be between €1 and
€2 trillion.
 40% target would increase EU GDP by 4.5% in 2030 (€457
billion) and increase sectoral employment: construction
(+20%), engineering (+4%) & manufacturing (+2%)
• BMUB/Frauhofer ISI indicates that development of EU demand side
electricity markets could cut gas use in the power sector equivalent
to 75% of Russian imports
December 2014 E3G 29

30. Are we on track?
• EU not on track. Projections indicate the 2020
target will be miss by 2-3%.
• 1/3 of energy savings due to economic crisis.
Only 10-12% savings will be delivered through
EE savings.
• New EE target is the weakest element of the
2030 package. Current approach mean only 10-
12% final energy savings will be delivered by
2030
December 2014 E3G 30

31. The Politics of EE
• EE measures require high upfront capital costs, creating high
financial and political barriers.
• There are fears that EE will weaken carbon price. Reality is that
2/3 of savings are in non-ETS sector so little impact if EE
measures targeted on buildings and transport.
• EE benefits not yet fully understood or misunderstood and
instrumentally used (UK vacuum cleaner)
• Current economic thinking one of the biggest barrier. Focus on
short term costs and budget rules block investment in productive
investment
• Affordability put at stake by ungrounded competitiveness fear
from Big industry. Overcapacity and poor past investment plan are
bigger obstacle than energy prices
December 2014 E3G 31

32. The Politics of 2030 framework
September 2014 E3G 32

33. CEE most inefficient economies and most
exposure on gas security
E3G - Third Generation
Environmentalism
33

34. Systemic approach to making best-value
choices on infrastructure funding
December 2014 E3G 34
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
Projected EU gas demand to 2030 (bcm)
Energy efficiency target met
European Commission reference scenario
PCI evaluation scenario

35. What needs to happen: two steps
1. Definitions matter. Review proposed EE 2030
target with aim of stress testing ambitions and
baselines in order to deliver existing cost effective
saving.
 Current target leaves >50% of Europe’s cost
effective energy saving potential untapped
2. New Commission should launch review of
remaining market, economic, financial,
institutional and governance barriers and proposed
structural reforms to address them
December 2014 E3G 35

36. Market, Economic and Financial Reforms
December 2014 E3G 36
• Deliver a single market for building products and service
standards through standardisation of certification.
• Raise ambition through product standards. Implement the
next wave of the Ecodesign and Energy Labelling Directive
• Secure the benefit of demand side management through
developing functional demand side electricity markets
• Create sufficient scope of public investment: Relax Treaty
on Stability, Coordination and Governance rule on debt and deficit
restrictions to allow public spending on energy efficiency as a
means of boosting growth
• Reprioritise public funds to where they deliver greatest
value for money. Reallocate CEF from transport to energy and
create conditionality on EE delivery

37. Thank you!
For more information visit www.e3g.org
Or drop me an email at
luca.bergamaschi@e3g.org
December 2014 E3G 37

38. A Presentation to the:
Ateliers du Shift
Paris
11th December 2014
Adrian Joyce
Secretary General
Boosting Energy Efficiency in the EU
(Buildings)

39. The European Alliance of
Companies for
Energy Efficiency in Buildings
EuroACE
More than 300,000 More than 770
Photos sourced from Norwegian Turkish Chamber of Commerce and SPS Commerce

40. Scale of the Opportunity
210 Million Buildings; Area of Occupied Space
Equivalent to Size of Belgium; 90% Still Used in 2050
Impact on Energy Use
40% of EU Primary Energy Use
36% of Energy-Related CO2 Emissions
Technologies Exist Today
Reduction of 80% in Energy Use is Possible With
Current Technologies and Processes
EU Buildings Sector

41. Share of Buildings in EU Energy Use
Highest Share
of Energy Use
=
Highest
Savings Potential

42. Energy Efficiency Directive
Adopted 2012; Transposition to national level slow;
Renovation of buildings: Articles 4 and 5;
Energy Performance Directive
Adopted 2010; New Build; nZEB; Certificates;
7 Member States in Court for non-implementation
However
Adopted EU Energy Efficiency Policy Currently Falls
Short of Adopted 2020 Targets
EU Regulatory Framework

43. EED: Renovation Roadmaps

44. EPBD: Value of EPCs

45. Huge Untapped Potential
Two-thirds of the
economic potential to
improve energy
efficiency
remains untapped in
the period to 2035
unless policy activity
increases

46. The Fraunhofer ISI Report on 2030
Sectoral Cost-Effective Contributions = 40% Savings in Overall Demand
61%
38% 41%
26%
40%

47. Increased Greenhouse Gas
Emission Reductions
Range 49% to 61%
Increased Share of Renewables
Range 35% to 48%
Impact of 40% Target in 2030

48. Benefits of Renovation for the EU
New Direct Local Jobs: 2 million
Local, Permanent Jobs in Construction;
This Leads to over 6 million Total New Jobs
Public Finances: €39bn per year
Boost to Public Finances in 2020
Rising to €78bn per year by 2030
Boost to EU GDP: 0.7% per year
Estimate Increase in Construction Output is in the
Range €670 to €830bn per year (from 2020)

49. Energy Imports to the EU
Example:
Gas Dependence of the EU

50. European Energy Dependence Day
Energy Dependence is Growing
Based on Statistics from Eurostat of the overall dependence of the EU on energy imports

51. Annual Cost of Energy Imports
€421 billion per year
=
€1.15 billion per day!
Impact on Member States Balance of Trade

52. European Energy Dependence Day Pushed Back!
Imagine: Capture These Savings in 2014
€335 billion in
reduced expenditure
compared to 2011

53. Financing Energy Efficiency Measures
Interim Report April 2014
Energy Efficiency – The First Fuel for the EU
Economy
Strong Regulatory Stability
Builds Confidence – Better More Complete
Implementation and Enforcement

54. Political Priority – Deep Renovation
Reduced Energy Imports
Millions of Jobs
Billions in Financial ReturnsWe are in this together!

55. National Implementation Workshops
Nine countries already – 2 per year; In 2015 hope to visit
Italy and Poland
Regulatory Work
Revise EPBD; Introduce mandatory renovation
requirements; Collect data on implementation
Renovate Europe Campaign
Political communications; Reduce energy demand by
80% by 2050; Supporters in EU Parliament: 79
EuroACE Key Actions

56. EuroACE
Rond Point Schuman, 6 - 8th floor
B-1040 Brussels
Tel: +32 (0) 2 639 10 10
Email: adrian.joyce@euroace.org
www.euroace.org
www.renovate-europe.eu
56
Thank You for Your Attention!

57. Partie 2 : Financer l’efficacité énergétique
des bâtiments en Europe
Antongiulio Marin
Policy Officer, DG Climate Action,
European Commission
Michel Lepetit
Vice-Président / Pilote du projet SFTE
The Shift Project
Matthieu Auzanneau (modérateur)
Chargé des affaires publiques et de la prospective
The Shift Project

58. Private Financing for Energy Efficiency
Financial instrument
PF4EE
Antongiulio Marin
DG CLIMA – Policy officer

59. PF4EE: Objectives
1. To make energy efficiency lending a more sustainable
activity across European financial institutions (FIs);
2. To encourage private commercial banks and other
financial intermediaries to address the energy efficiency
sector as a distinct market segment;
3. To increase lending for energy efficiency in response to
priorities identified by Member States’ National Energy
Efficiency Action Plans.

60. PF4EE: Structure

61. PF4EE on webpages :
http://ec.europa.eu/clima/news/articles/news_2014120901_en.htm
http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/budget/life/instruments/index_en.htm
http://www.eib.org/products/pf4ee/index.htm