The document discusses populating the GEONETCAB portal with capacity building resources. It provides an overview of GEONETCAB and describes its current achievements, including developing a typology and metadata standards for capacity building resources. The workshop objectives are to demonstrate how to search, create, edit and link capacity building resources in the GEONETCAB portal. Expected improvements include making the inventory more comprehensive and interconnecting portals to better share resources. A long term goal is developing a "capacity building system of systems" using brokered architecture to connect different capacity building databases.
This document discusses the EOPOWER Resource Facility, which aims to provide a centralized catalog of capacity building resources related to Earth observation. The resource facility allows users to discover and access these resources. It also allows providers to manage resource metadata and publish their descriptions. The document outlines the types of capacity building resources that could be included, such as organizations, programs, documents, software, and training. It also describes the technical aspects of the resource facility, including its use of ISO 19115 metadata standards and interoperability with the GEOSS registry. Finally, it proposes the development of a Capacity Building System of Systems to improve interconnectivity between this facility and other capacity building databases.
The document discusses establishing a Capacity Building System of Systems (CB Sos) to improve discovery and access to capacity building resources through interoperability between existing resource facilities. It proposes a brokered architecture that would allow existing systems to remain autonomous while being connected through mediation components. This would avoid duplicating efforts and provide a more comprehensive view of available materials. The CB Sos is being implemented through collaboration between the EOPOWER and IASON projects, with the goal of eventually involving other relevant GEO working groups.
This document summarizes a presentation about collaborating the EOPOWER project with the CEOS Resource Facility to make Earth observation capacity building resources more accessible. It provides an overview of EOPOWER's objectives to promote sustainable development through Earth observation applications. The presentation outlines the status of the collaboration between EOPOWER and CEOS to develop a system that allows various capacity building systems to share resources through a common architecture and portal. It identifies remaining tasks for EOPOWER and CEOS to further the collaboration by integrating additional content and resources.
The GEOCAB portal provides freely accessible information to help decision makers and scientists become more familiar with Earth observation applications and opportunities. It contains over 590 registered capacity building resources categorized by type and sustainable development area. Contributors include organizations funding and providing material on Earth observation inside and outside of GEO. The portal aims to make resources visible and useful to others, increase awareness of other organizations' capacity building work, and coordinate existing and future initiatives. Participation involves requesting an account and adding new resources using guidelines.
The document discusses populating the GEONETCAB portal with capacity building resources. It provides an overview of GEONETCAB and describes its current achievements, including developing a typology and metadata standards for capacity building resources. The workshop objectives are to demonstrate how to search, create, edit and link capacity building resources in the GEONETCAB portal. Expected improvements include making the inventory more comprehensive and interconnecting portals to better share resources. A long term goal is developing a "capacity building system of systems" using brokered architecture to connect different capacity building databases.
This document discusses the EOPOWER Resource Facility, which aims to provide a centralized catalog of capacity building resources related to Earth observation. The resource facility allows users to discover and access these resources. It also allows providers to manage resource metadata and publish their descriptions. The document outlines the types of capacity building resources that could be included, such as organizations, programs, documents, software, and training. It also describes the technical aspects of the resource facility, including its use of ISO 19115 metadata standards and interoperability with the GEOSS registry. Finally, it proposes the development of a Capacity Building System of Systems to improve interconnectivity between this facility and other capacity building databases.
The document discusses establishing a Capacity Building System of Systems (CB Sos) to improve discovery and access to capacity building resources through interoperability between existing resource facilities. It proposes a brokered architecture that would allow existing systems to remain autonomous while being connected through mediation components. This would avoid duplicating efforts and provide a more comprehensive view of available materials. The CB Sos is being implemented through collaboration between the EOPOWER and IASON projects, with the goal of eventually involving other relevant GEO working groups.
This document summarizes a presentation about collaborating the EOPOWER project with the CEOS Resource Facility to make Earth observation capacity building resources more accessible. It provides an overview of EOPOWER's objectives to promote sustainable development through Earth observation applications. The presentation outlines the status of the collaboration between EOPOWER and CEOS to develop a system that allows various capacity building systems to share resources through a common architecture and portal. It identifies remaining tasks for EOPOWER and CEOS to further the collaboration by integrating additional content and resources.
The GEOCAB portal provides freely accessible information to help decision makers and scientists become more familiar with Earth observation applications and opportunities. It contains over 590 registered capacity building resources categorized by type and sustainable development area. Contributors include organizations funding and providing material on Earth observation inside and outside of GEO. The portal aims to make resources visible and useful to others, increase awareness of other organizations' capacity building work, and coordinate existing and future initiatives. Participation involves requesting an account and adding new resources using guidelines.
1) The document presents a semantic approach for improving an environmental data cataloguing service called MDweb by leveraging thematic and spatial reference bases.
2) It aims to address issues with existing cataloguing tools not exploiting thesauri or the interaction between thematic and spatial aspects. The approach develops mechanisms for query expansion, filtering, and semantic visualization of results.
3) Future work includes transitioning from a thesaurus to an ontology, developing user profiles, and enabling searches directly from the semantic network visualization.
Spatial Data Infrastructure involves data modeling, metadata, and web services for data access. Data modeling involves conceptualizing user needs, developing a data model, encoding the data, and publishing it. Metadata provides information about spatial data to improve discovery. Registry and discovery services allow querying metadata. Web services like WMS and WFS enable accessing and manipulating mapped features through standard interfaces.
Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) aims to provide access to harmonized geographic data through distributed information systems. Key components of an SDI include organizational governance, spatial data and metadata, geospatial services, technical infrastructure, and standards to ensure interoperability. Open standards like those from ISO and OGC provide interfaces and data models to allow disparate systems and data sources to work together efficiently for semantic and technical interoperability. Ensuring data quality and developing terminology to describe accuracy is also important for effective use of data in an SDI.
This document discusses mutualization of environmental data and knowledge through metadata and reference bases. It aims to facilitate information exchange between actors by developing common platforms. These platforms include a metadata service to catalog and share resources using standards like ISO 19115. They also provide reference bases like ontologies and thesauri to control vocabularies and spatial objects. This knowledge mutualization helps search and interpret data in its proper context. The goal is to optimize environmental monitoring, management and decision making by enabling easy access and understanding of diverse environmental information sources.
The document discusses building a structured database of capacity building resources based on an inventory from WP1 and WP2. It will design a UML model and link resources to business associations to aid navigation. The objectives are to provide online access to the resource inventory and stories for different users and share knowledge between resources. Conceptual analysis defined key concepts like a resource network typology. Forms were designed to input resource descriptions into the database based on the conceptual model. This covers general information, specific attributes depending on the resource type, and access constraints. The database will cover free and restricted access resources, with the latter including data access programs.
This document discusses metadata profiles for different themes in the NatureSDI+ project, including biogeographical regions, habitats and biotopes, and species distribution. It presents tables outlining mandatory, conditional, and optional metadata elements for each theme. It raises several questions about the level of detail needed for lineage information and observations, terminology harmonization, and how to describe species data and aggregation methods. The document identifies key points to discuss regarding metadata specificity and relevance for accurately describing datasets in different natural resource themes.
metadata profiles for protected sites. analysis and propositions for annex IIIDesconnets Jean-Christophe
This document discusses the development of a metadata profile for protected sites within the NatureSDI+ project. It describes work done so far to draft the metadata specification based on INSPIRE and other requirements. It outlines the current steps, which include reviewing and discussing the draft, analyzing new metadata elements from the Protected Sites data specification version 3.0, and conducting an initial analysis of metadata proposed for Annex III datasets. The document concludes by outlining plans to finalize the metadata specification draft by the next project milestone.
Metadata specification at work: some examples of INSPIRE use cases with a cat...Desconnets Jean-Christophe
This document discusses the use of metadata specifications and cataloging tools to enable data discovery and use. It provides examples of how metadata profiles can be developed based on community requirements to support specific use cases. One such profile, NatureSDI+, is implemented using the MDweb cataloging tool to allow discovery and viewing of protected site data. Several use cases are presented that demonstrate how MDweb can be used to catalog habitat and species data, search and summarize protected area information, and harvest metadata from other catalog services. The document highlights how metadata specifications, tools, and profiles work together to serve geospatial data users and support INSPIRE directives.
1) The document presents a semantic approach for improving an environmental data cataloguing service called MDweb by leveraging thematic and spatial reference bases.
2) It aims to address issues with existing cataloguing tools not exploiting thesauri or the interaction between thematic and spatial aspects. The approach develops mechanisms for query expansion, filtering, and semantic visualization of results.
3) Future work includes transitioning from a thesaurus to an ontology, developing user profiles, and enabling searches directly from the semantic network visualization.
Spatial Data Infrastructure involves data modeling, metadata, and web services for data access. Data modeling involves conceptualizing user needs, developing a data model, encoding the data, and publishing it. Metadata provides information about spatial data to improve discovery. Registry and discovery services allow querying metadata. Web services like WMS and WFS enable accessing and manipulating mapped features through standard interfaces.
Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) aims to provide access to harmonized geographic data through distributed information systems. Key components of an SDI include organizational governance, spatial data and metadata, geospatial services, technical infrastructure, and standards to ensure interoperability. Open standards like those from ISO and OGC provide interfaces and data models to allow disparate systems and data sources to work together efficiently for semantic and technical interoperability. Ensuring data quality and developing terminology to describe accuracy is also important for effective use of data in an SDI.
This document discusses mutualization of environmental data and knowledge through metadata and reference bases. It aims to facilitate information exchange between actors by developing common platforms. These platforms include a metadata service to catalog and share resources using standards like ISO 19115. They also provide reference bases like ontologies and thesauri to control vocabularies and spatial objects. This knowledge mutualization helps search and interpret data in its proper context. The goal is to optimize environmental monitoring, management and decision making by enabling easy access and understanding of diverse environmental information sources.
The document discusses building a structured database of capacity building resources based on an inventory from WP1 and WP2. It will design a UML model and link resources to business associations to aid navigation. The objectives are to provide online access to the resource inventory and stories for different users and share knowledge between resources. Conceptual analysis defined key concepts like a resource network typology. Forms were designed to input resource descriptions into the database based on the conceptual model. This covers general information, specific attributes depending on the resource type, and access constraints. The database will cover free and restricted access resources, with the latter including data access programs.
This document discusses metadata profiles for different themes in the NatureSDI+ project, including biogeographical regions, habitats and biotopes, and species distribution. It presents tables outlining mandatory, conditional, and optional metadata elements for each theme. It raises several questions about the level of detail needed for lineage information and observations, terminology harmonization, and how to describe species data and aggregation methods. The document identifies key points to discuss regarding metadata specificity and relevance for accurately describing datasets in different natural resource themes.
metadata profiles for protected sites. analysis and propositions for annex IIIDesconnets Jean-Christophe
This document discusses the development of a metadata profile for protected sites within the NatureSDI+ project. It describes work done so far to draft the metadata specification based on INSPIRE and other requirements. It outlines the current steps, which include reviewing and discussing the draft, analyzing new metadata elements from the Protected Sites data specification version 3.0, and conducting an initial analysis of metadata proposed for Annex III datasets. The document concludes by outlining plans to finalize the metadata specification draft by the next project milestone.
Metadata specification at work: some examples of INSPIRE use cases with a cat...Desconnets Jean-Christophe
This document discusses the use of metadata specifications and cataloging tools to enable data discovery and use. It provides examples of how metadata profiles can be developed based on community requirements to support specific use cases. One such profile, NatureSDI+, is implemented using the MDweb cataloging tool to allow discovery and viewing of protected site data. Several use cases are presented that demonstrate how MDweb can be used to catalog habitat and species data, search and summarize protected area information, and harvest metadata from other catalog services. The document highlights how metadata specifications, tools, and profiles work together to serve geospatial data users and support INSPIRE directives.
Alternative - Complément au Tramway et 3ème lien de la ville de Québec Daniel Bedard
An update of this presentation has been done with Slide 16 that has been updated and 17 has been added, only.
Cette présentation a été ajournée avec la diapo 16 qui a été modifié et la 17 qui a été ajouté.
Voir ici
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/alternative-au-tramway-de-la-ville-de-quebec-rev1-sum-pdf/269691794
CDPQ Infra dévoile un plan de mobilité de 15 G$ sur 15 ans pour la région de Québec. Une alternative plus économique et rapide, ne serait-elle pas posssible?
- Valoriser les infrastructures ferroviaires du CN, en créant un Réseau Express Métropolitain (REM) plutôt qu'un nouveau tramway ou une combinaison des 2.
- Optimiser l'utilisation des rails pour un transport combiné des marchandises et des personnes, en accordant une priorité aux déplacements des personnes aux heures de pointes.
- Intégrer un téléphérique transrives comme 3ème lien urbain dédiés aux piétons et cyclistes avec correspondance avec le REM.
- Le 3 ème lien routier est repensé en intégrant un tunnel routier qui se prolonge avec le nouveau pont de l'Île d'Orléans et quelques réaménagemet de ses chausées.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/bedarddaniel/
English:
CDPQ Infra unveils a $15 billion, 15-year mobility plan for the Quebec region. Wouldn't a more economical and faster alternative be possible?
Leverage CN's railway infrastructure by creating a Metropolitan Express Network (REM) instead of a new tramway or a combination of both.
Optimize the use of rails for combined freight and passenger transport, giving priority to passenger travel during peak hours.
Integrate a cross-river cable car as a third urban link dedicated to pedestrians and cyclists, with connections to the REM.
Rethink the third road link by integrating a road tunnel that extends with the new Île d'Orléans bridge and some reconfiguration of its lanes.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/bedarddaniel/
Alternative - Complément au Tramway et 3ème lien de la ville de Québec
Proposition de structuration des métadonnées en géosciences: spécificité de la communauté scientifique
1. Proposition de structuration desProposition de structuration des
métadonnées en géosciencesmétadonnées en géosciences ::
Spécificité de la communauté scientifique
Jean-Christophe DesconnetsJean-Christophe Desconnets**
, Thérèse Libourel, Thérèse Libourel****
, Pierre, Pierre
MaurelMaurel******
, André Miralles, André Miralles******
, Michel Passouant, Michel Passouant ********
*
IRD – Programme ROSELT Maison de la télédétection, 500, avenue J.F. Breton 34093 Montpellier cedex 05.
**
LIRMM,161 rue Ada 34392 Montpellier Cedex 5.
***
Cemagref UMR 3S Maison de la télédétection, 500, avenue J.F. Breton 34093 Montpellier cedex 05.
****
CIRAD - TERA, CIRAD, "TA 60/15", 73 avenue Jean François Breton, 34938 Montpellier Cedex 5.
2. Objectifs de la propositionObjectifs de la proposition
• Assurer la diffusion de la donnée et son accèsAssurer la diffusion de la donnée et son accès
au sein de la communautéau sein de la communauté
• Faciliter sa visibilité et son partage à « l’extérieur »Faciliter sa visibilité et son partage à « l’extérieur »
de la communautéde la communauté
base pour la construction de services de métadonnéesbase pour la construction de services de métadonnées
Proposer uneProposer une structure générique utilisable etstructure générique utilisable et
instrumentableinstrumentable par les chercheurspar les chercheurs
3. ContexteContexte
Domaine d’applicationDomaine d’application
Intérêt pour la communauté scientifiqueIntérêt pour la communauté scientifique
Systèmes d’information relatifs aux géosciences
Gérer le patrimoine scientifique
Besoin de structurer et représenter la connaissance
scientifique
Introduction d’une démarche qualité
Capacités des NTIC pour la diffusion les données
4. Rôle des métadonnéesRôle des métadonnées
Quel rôle ?Quel rôle ?
Identification et spécification de la donnée de
« référence »
Faciliter ou améliorer la diffusion de la donnée
Aider aux croisements de sémantiques liés à différents
domaines d’expertises
• Métadonnées « principales »Métadonnées « principales »
• Métadonnées « élargiesMétadonnées « élargies »
5. Service de métadonnéesService de métadonnées
Les services type « inventaire des ressources en géomatique »Les services type « inventaire des ressources en géomatique »
Les services type « observatoire »Les services type « observatoire »
Les services type « mémoire d’expertise »Les services type « mémoire d’expertise »
Mutualisation interne, ex : Cemagref
Accès direct ou filtré à la donnée, ex : ROSELT
Remobiliser les données par d’autres équipes,
ex : CIRAD
6. modèle générique de métadonnéesmodèle générique de métadonnées
*
Support
0..1
A pour
T
1..*
Est décrit
1..*
Domaine Etude
O
Classé
1
*
Type
C
ProtocoleTraitement
*
*Source
Alimente
T
* Résultat
ProtocoleAquisition/Traitement
1
Produit
Protocole
C T
T
1..*
*
Applique
T
Opérateur
*
Se situe
*
Localisation
C
Donnée
référence
T
7. Type
1..*
1..1
3 a pour
Exemple d’affinage du concept TYPEExemple d’affinage du concept TYPE
• Cas d’un service type « observatoire » (ROSELT)Cas d’un service type « observatoire » (ROSELT)
Donnée référence
Type simple
Mesure sol
Information spatiale
image carte
Document texte
Rapport Publication présentation
BD
SIG
Catalogue
Type complexe
2..*
0..1
3 est composé
8. Protocole de traitement
0..*
0..*
est source
0..*
0..*
produit
Unité d'observation
0..*
*
Opérateur
1..*
1..*
intervient
Exemple d’affinage du concept PROTOCOLEExemple d’affinage du concept PROTOCOLE
• Cas d’un service type « observatoire » (ROSELT)Cas d’un service type « observatoire » (ROSELT)
Donnée référence
Protocole
protocole d'acquisition
9. Exemples d’architecture : module de saisieExemples d’architecture : module de saisie
Serveur
BD
métadonnées
SGBD
méta-données
Scripts
PHP
Page de vérification
libellé xxxxx
Date xxxxx
validationValidation
RequêtesSQL
Client HTML
Requêtes serveur
Formulaire saisie
libellé
Date
okok
Module de
contrôle
javascript
10. Exemples d’architecture : module de consultationExemples d’architecture : module de consultation
BD
métadonnées
BD
métadonnées
Serveur
Requêteur Multi-critères
Thématique
localisation
okok
scripts PHP
Requêtes SQL
Servlet Cocoon
XSLT
transformer
Analyseur
XML
Fichier
XML
Fiche de métadonnées
nom
date
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Liste des données
Donnée 1
Donnée 2
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
okok
okok
Appel Script
Page HTMLformatage
XSL
Client HTML
11. Intérêts et perspectivesIntérêts et perspectives
• Structuration des métadonnéesStructuration des métadonnées
• fonctionnalitésfonctionnalités d’und’un service de métadonnéesservice de métadonnées
Inventaire et mise à jour semi - automatiqueInventaire et mise à jour semi - automatique
Aide à la recherche d’informations cibléeAide à la recherche d’informations ciblée
Accès direct ou filtré à la donnéeAccès direct ou filtré à la donnée
Modèle OuvertModèle Ouvert
Réutilisation des qualifications de la donnée par les normesRéutilisation des qualifications de la donnée par les normes
Spécificité du cycle de vie d’une donnéeSpécificité du cycle de vie d’une donnée
Traçabilité de la donnéeTraçabilité de la donnée